Aussie wrote on Dec 6
th, 2016 at 6:11pm:
freediver wrote on Dec 6
th, 2016 at 5:57pm:
Sure. Has anyone suggested an alternative means of arriving at damages?
Gandalf, do you agree that Toben was jailed for denying the holocaust, or do you take the learned Aussie's view that he was jailed for Contempt of Court by defying a Court Order not refraining from denying the holocaust (and anything else is a blatant lie of the most scurrilous kind)
I've corrected the question so that I am not verballed, and to make it accurate in terms of what I said, and not what FD wishes I had said.
Your own words Aussie:
Aussie wrote on Dec 2
nd, 2016 at 7:51pm:
Finally...after how many pages, you get it correct:
Quote:So he was not jailed for denying the holocaust. He was jailed for not ceasing to deny the holocaust?
....as he was ordered to do by the Court.
Your own words again Aussie:
Aussie wrote on Dec 3
rd, 2016 at 8:58pm:
freediver wrote on Dec 3
rd, 2016 at 8:50pm:
Can you clarify that when you accused me of lying about whether the man was jailed for denying the holocaust (without explanation) you merely meant that he was jailed for refusing to cease denying the holocaust?
How many times must I do that for you freediver? I have agreed with that.
The evidence you introduced Aussie:
Aussie wrote on Nov 27
th, 2016 at 12:58pm:
Pausing there, it follows from the above that there is no room for dispute that Dr Toben has spent time in prison in Australia for criminal contempt constituted by the publication of material found to have racially vilified the Jewish people and which conveyed imputations including that there was serious doubt that the Holocaust occurred.
After agreeing with all this, do you still insist it is a "blatant lie of the most scurrilous kind" to suggest he was jailed for denying the holocaust?