Paki gob on a stick wrote on Apr 27
th, 2019 at 9:46pm:
Come come, you've already referenced the IPA, dear.
No petal. I referenced Jennifer Maharosy. There is a difference. It is like saying Chris Bowen is the ALP.
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Apr 27
th, 2019 at 9:46pm:
Your fracking argument's an industry study too.
Seeing as I didn't reference any study that must make you a Nostra Dumb Arse.
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Apr 27
th, 2019 at 9:46pm:
When they were confronted about all the industrial chemicals fracking injects into the ground, they said, oh ha ha, but they're nice chemicals.
You do understand fracking uses any pressurised liquid. Even water.
"Hydraulic fracturing of a single horizontal well can involve injection of millions of gallons of a 98% water fluid, taken from valuable freshwater sources or, increasingly, recycled from previous operations. However, water released from geological features and the injected fluid -- which also includes a “proppant,” such as sand, to hold fractures open, and typically around 1% of chemical additives – returns to the surface. "
https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/policy/publicpolicies/sustainability/hydrauli...perhaps you should try to keep up with the times.
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Apr 27
th, 2019 at 9:46pm:
So given we now know where you're coming from, Lee, the jig's up. But I'm curious. Why would anyone parrot what the big polluters say without even being paid for it?
ooh look another assertion without proof.
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Apr 27
th, 2019 at 9:46pm:
Still, we know you're not getting a cent.
That's right petal. Unlike some who say I do.
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Apr 27
th, 2019 at 9:46pm:
How tragic is that?
Not at all. I like the science. You just don't seem to offer any. Just assertion after assertion and some unnamed guilty party who apparently does all the fracking on earth.