Dnarever wrote on Dec 25
th, 2017 at 10:53am:
There are thousands of reports and even this one is talking about the claimed hiatus period as a drop in the rate of increase. The climate sceptics claim that there is no increase. It is different.
I don't know anyone who says that. Can you please provide proof?
Dnarever wrote on Dec 25
th, 2017 at 10:53am:
The vast majority are still saying that there was no hiatus.
And the later ones say that there was. Who to believe?
You do know it is not a popularity contest? The most votes doesn't necessarily win.
Dnarever wrote on Dec 25
th, 2017 at 10:53am:
Things like record hot year after record hot year,
Oh you mean the ones that can pinpoint temperatures back to 1880-1890 to within +-.01º C. That's too funny. I think there were something like 5 stations in Europe back then. And of course the water temperature wasn't input into global temps until about 1980 and then they reconstructed backwards.
Absolutely too funny.
But at least you have now agreed that the IPCC did in fact say there was an hiatus.
You will notice I also wrote this-
lee wrote on Dec 24
th, 2017 at 4:29pm:
Did you know the "hiatus" is determined by the IPCC as warming not being at the same rate as the 1979-2000 warming?
Well, I suppose I could be wrong. According to you 1998.
I don't know anyone who says that. Can you please provide proof?
One google search 1.5 seconds first link: Well ok it is by an idiot.
The Pause lengthens again – just in time for Paris
No global warming at all for 18 years 9 months – a new record
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley