Australian Politics Forum

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39469
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #75 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:50pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:42pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:33pm:

crocodile wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 2:16pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 11:15am:

crocodile wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 11:12am:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 10:13am:

nope ... i don't agree. He covered up abuse and should be jailed for it

He wasn't charged with that.

he should have been

Completely irrelevant.

no it's not. The dog should be in jail. The rest is semantics

I guess you are totally wrong, now. You'll just have to suck it up.

wrong about what? he should be in jail. That stands irrespective of this case. This case has nothing to do with his covering up abuse for decades.

Ask the High Court. They just acquitted him. Sucks, ey. There is nowhere to go Mr Smith. The High Court is the end of the line. Pell is innocent of the charges brought against him which ought to have been dismissed two years ago. The High Court has so ruled.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39469
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #76 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:52pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:48pm:

Another interesting thing to me was the complainants lawyers were interviewed on SkyNews today and talked of a civil case against Pell can someone explain how this can occur after todays findings

OJ Simpson comes to mind, did something like that happen with him?

Perhaps our resident lawyers Aussie and BO can explain.

I have made no secret that I am a Lawyer. BO? Nah. Mr Neck, really!

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 77853
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #77 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:53pm

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:50pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:42pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:33pm:

crocodile wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 2:16pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 11:15am:

crocodile wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 11:12am:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 10:13am:

nope ... i don't agree. He covered up abuse and should be jailed for it

He wasn't charged with that.

he should have been

Completely irrelevant.

no it's not. The dog should be in jail. The rest is semantics

I guess you are totally wrong, now. You'll just have to suck it up.

wrong about what? he should be in jail. That stands irrespective of this case. This case has nothing to do with his covering up abuse for decades.

Ask the High Court. They just acquitted him. Sucks, ey. There is nowhere to go Mr Smith. The High Court is the end of the line. Pell is innocent of the charges brought against him which ought to have been dismissed two years ago. The High Court has so ruled.

where exactly did they acquit him of covering up abuse?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Redmond Neck

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 22315
ACT
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #78 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:56pm

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:52pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:48pm:

Another interesting thing to me was the complainants lawyers were interviewed on SkyNews today and talked of a civil case against Pell can someone explain how this can occur after todays findings

OJ Simpson comes to mind, did something like that happen with him?

Perhaps our resident lawyers Aussie and BO can explain.

I have made no secret that I am a Lawyer. BO? Nah. Mr Neck, really!

Well according to Brian Ross she is and I have seen her refer to her studying law!

So maybe you have some competition!

Wink

Back to top

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39469
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #79 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:00pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:53pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:50pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:42pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:33pm:

crocodile wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 2:16pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 11:15am:

crocodile wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 11:12am:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 10:13am:

nope ... i don't agree. He covered up abuse and should be jailed for it

He wasn't charged with that.

he should have been

Completely irrelevant.

no it's not. The dog should be in jail. The rest is semantics

I guess you are totally wrong, now. You'll just have to suck it up.

wrong about what? he should be in jail. That stands irrespective of this case. This case has nothing to do with his covering up abuse for decades.

Ask the High Court. They just acquitted him. Sucks, ey. There is nowhere to go Mr Smith. The High Court is the end of the line. Pell is innocent of the charges brought against him which ought to have been dismissed two years ago. The High Court has so ruled.

where exactly did they acquit him of covering up abuse?

You know as well as everyone does, that is strawman crap. He was never charged with that. Hollingsworth was accused of it but never charged.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39469
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #80 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:02pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:56pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:52pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:48pm:

Another interesting thing to me was the complainants lawyers were interviewed on SkyNews today and talked of a civil case against Pell can someone explain how this can occur after todays findings

OJ Simpson comes to mind, did something like that happen with him?

Perhaps our resident lawyers Aussie and BO can explain.

I have made no secret that I am a Lawyer. BO? Nah. Mr Neck, really!

Well according to Brian Ross she is and I have seen her refer to her studying law!

So maybe you have some competition!

Wink

I don't believe you. I have never seen anything of the kind posted anywhere. You seem to be breaching the private information Rule, Mr Neck, but I'll leave that for others to worry about. I will not be reporting it.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 77853
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #81 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:03pm

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:00pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:53pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:50pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:42pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:33pm:

crocodile wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 2:16pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 11:15am:

crocodile wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 11:12am:

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 10:13am:

nope ... i don't agree. He covered up abuse and should be jailed for it

He wasn't charged with that.

he should have been

Completely irrelevant.

no it's not. The dog should be in jail. The rest is semantics

I guess you are totally wrong, now. You'll just have to suck it up.

wrong about what? he should be in jail. That stands irrespective of this case. This case has nothing to do with his covering up abuse for decades.

Ask the High Court. They just acquitted him. Sucks, ey. There is nowhere to go Mr Smith. The High Court is the end of the line. Pell is innocent of the charges brought against him which ought to have been dismissed two years ago. The High Court has so ruled.

where exactly did they acquit him of covering up abuse?

You know as well as everyone does, that is strawman crap. He was never charged with that. Hollingsworth was accused of it but never charged.

Nothing straw man about it. My argument has always been he should be in jail for decades of covering up abuse. I said that from my very first post. You were the one who thinks he being innocent of this charge of kiddy fiddling also means he is innocent of covering up abuse.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Redmond Neck

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 22315
ACT
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #82 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:05pm

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:02pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:56pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:52pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 4:48pm:

Another interesting thing to me was the complainants lawyers were interviewed on SkyNews today and talked of a civil case against Pell can someone explain how this can occur after todays findings

OJ Simpson comes to mind, did something like that happen with him?

Perhaps our resident lawyers Aussie and BO can explain.

I have made no secret that I am a Lawyer. BO? Nah. Mr Neck, really!

Well according to Brian Ross she is and I have seen her refer to her studying law!

So maybe you have some competition!

Wink

I don't believe you. I have never seen anything of the kind posted anywhere. You seem to be breaching the private information Rule, Mr Neck, but I'll leave that for others to worry about. I will not be reporting it.

Not posted in any private boards at all if I recall!

Ask Brian!

Back to top

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39469 Gender:	Re: Pell walks Reply #83 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:07pm Brian has SFA to do with it. YOU mentioned it, not Brian.
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39469
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #84 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:09pm

Quote:

Nothing straw man about it. My argument has always been he should be in jail for decades of covering up abuse. I said that from my very first post. You were the one who thinks he being innocent of this charge of kiddy fiddling also means he is innocent of covering up abuse.

Perhaps he should be in jail for stealing your chickens. (Think about it.)

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 77853
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #85 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:10pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:05pm:

Not posted in any private boards at all if I recall!

private information about other members posted elsewhere on the internet is not allowed. There is nothing in the rules about private or public boards.

Quote:

Do not post personal information about other members without their explicit permission. This includes the contents of personal messages and emails, photos, names, IP addresses, phone numbers, locations etc. This includes information that can be found online and instructions on how to find information about specific members.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 77853
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #86 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:11pm

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:09pm:

Quote:

Nothing straw man about it. My argument has always been he should be in jail for decades of covering up abuse. I said that from my very first post. You were the one who thinks he being innocent of this charge of kiddy fiddling also means he is innocent of covering up abuse.

Perhaps he should be in jail for stealing your chickens. (Think about it.)

Nothing to think about, you were wrong. Now leave my chickens alone

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39469 Gender:	Re: Pell walks Reply #87 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:20pm No, I heard that he was mucking around with your chickens. He goes to jail for it. No charge, no trial...straight to jail because I heard about it.
Back to top	IP Logged

President Elect, The Mechanic

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #88 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:26pm

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 1:22pm:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 12:50pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 12:44pm:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 12:22pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 12:13pm:

In the wild west he would have been hanged
after the first trial.

I never thought there was enough evidence -
it was one man's word against another.

but they kept saying that he was a "Credible" witness... Cheesy

how on earth can the victim be a credible witness??

and he changed his story multiple times..

Its like those women who accuse men of rape tha never happened...

"but they seem credible" Cheesy

No, he did not. He was consistent.

Quote:

The complainant initially asserted that the two incidents occurred within a few months of each other in 1996.

It transpired that the first time Pell said mass at St Patrick’s was 15 December, rendering this timeline impossible.

The prosecution then changed its story, stating that the first incident occurred in 1996 and the second in February 1997

.

"Multiple times." Getting a year wrong is hardly noteworthy.

Changing your story to fit the times that Pell was actually in that location at that time is no big deal??

Its any wonder that you are a corrupt, failed, "try hard" solicitor who drives a taxi and eats curryshit sandwiches three times a day...

what a loser.. Grin

Back to top

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39469 Gender:	Re: Pell walks Reply #89 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 5:29pm Where are the 'multiple' changes you asserted?
Back to top	IP Logged