Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jun 15
th, 2019 at 8:22pm:
I note thatthe phrase used for these 'right wing extremists' killing people is that they 'have ties to right wing groups' - not that they are members as such - but they have 'ties' (undefined).
That's like saying that someone who reported their house broken into is 'known to police'..... (one serious flaw in past NSW Police commissioner Peter Ryan's approach of 'every contact with police is recorded'..... thus if you go to police for help several times - you are 'known to police' if they somehow want to fit you up)....
I'd like someone to clarify what these 'right wing extremist ties' actually are.... and I note that the second site I posted below says 'most acted alone' etc... now - that may not mean they are not part of a group - but clearly it does not say they are...
They may sit around drinking coffee with some 'right wing extremists' - and then go and act on their own. This is quite unlike the murderer of Curtis Cheng, who received indoctrination, was supplied the weapon and then given support to carry out the act.
Let's look at Tarrant - he was very low profile until he struck .. no connection with 'right wing extremists' in NZ bent on killing a host of innocents....one group approached him to join and he was active in an online community - but it does not appear he joined any group...
How say you, my fine feathered friends?
They have nothing to say unless it arrives in this week's manual from the Saudi fronts and Soros fronts
they're empty
and most of all, empty of integrity
They say love of money is the root of all evil
but others believe poverty is the root of most evil
and the poverty-stricken desperates who post for pay illustrate that … sadly
they'd post anything, anywhere which will tolerate their crap
as long as they get enough per day to buy a couple of packets of cheap instant noodles
To rid itself of bottom-feeders, like those who post division, disruption and out and out filth and disharmony, society should (a) check if they're in receipt of welfare and (b) put them on card-only welfare to prevent them burning taxpayers' hard earned dollars on drugs and grog and force them to be able to buy only wholesome foods. And of course, take away their internet. Welfare recipients shouldn't be able to subsidise their welfare monies via posting online for pay -- catering to the most divisive element in world society -- unless they are working and earning sufficient to house and feed themselves and pay for their own internet connection
too many parasites undermining decent society with divisive lies, which they KNOW to be lies
and pretend virtue signalling under a variety of socks
for profit
curse them