lee wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2019 at 9:51pm:


Quote:


Randomly throwing in piles of data that you don't support, does not support you and that you have no comment on and which does not add to the topic or is relevant to it I would think fair to call a misuse. As ststed it is just throwing mud in the water.

Quote:


I said nothing about her arguments being persuasive if they were or not.

I found it much more interesting that he thought that you had believed the things that you had posted even though it is all contradictory.

Like this vortex post - you just posted it for no reason, there is nothing to say you agree with it or even believe it.

If Karnal comes back as says something about your view on the Polar Vortex you would likely say prove that I have a view on it.

Here's Lee at his most persuasive, dears. He hasn't mentioned a "fact" in pages.

Option 4: sabotage.

lee wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2019 at 3:09pm:


For someone who rants constantly about climate science you know very little about it. Just google "climate change increased variability" and you will get about 60 million results. For example:

https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/5/eaar5809.full

Climate models predict increasing temperature variability in poor countries

Extreme events such as heat waves are among the most challenging aspects of climate change for societies. We show that climate models consistently project increases in temperature variability in tropical countries over the coming decades, with the Amazon as a particular hotspot of concern.

lee wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2019 at 11:15am:


Here you go:



You like a bit of a giggle, don't you, love?

freediver wrote on Apr 24^th, 2019 at 6:14pm:


Better whack in a couple of these for good measure, son. He mightn't understand you otherwise:

lee wrote on Apr 24^th, 2019 at 6:33pm:


Here you go, Lee:



Convincing, innit.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Apr 24^th, 2019 at 6:37pm:



The message you are providing is mixed. Perhaps you could add them to your list of quotes about me?