Dnarever wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2019 at 9:22am:



But that is NOT a part of the CO2 mantra.

And then of course the CO2 induced Polar Vortex.

freediver wrote on Apr 21^st, 2019 at 8:06pm:


You mean these same folks that told us through the 1970's that we would be in glacial state by 2000.

Then they changed their minds to global warming and still got it wrong bwhhaahaaahaa.

You trust in these FOOLS............!!!

AND what to pay through the nose for it.....!!!

Ajax wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2019 at 1:40pm:


I mean what I said in the highlighted bit. Once again you claimed to be refuting something by posting the evidence that supports it. Perhaps if you took 30 seconds to understand what you think you disagree with first you wouldn't keep doing this.

lee wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2019 at 11:46am:


Just keep on throwing irrelevance in meant to obfuscate.

It looks like the Polar vortex may be warming induced or influenced but the result isn't in yet. Don't think anyone has said that the polar vortex is directly CO2 induced (except for you), some say that it may be caused by the warming and reduced ice.

How do you fit polar vortex into this topic ? Are you making an argument that it proves global warming, that it disproves global warming or that it is related to a need for a carbon penalty ?

You have stated an effect but as per usual do not seem to have a point or an opinion, just shovelling more mud.

Dnarever wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2019 at 8:56pm:



"When the polar vortex pieces wander, warmth invades the Arctic, Alaska, Greenland and Canada, Masters said. While the Midwest chills, Australia has been broiling to record-breaking heat. The world as a whole on Monday was 0.7 degrees (0.4 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1979-2000 average, according to the University of Maine's Climate Reanalyzer.

Some scientists—but by no means most—see a connection between human-caused climate change and difference in atmospheric pressure that causes slower moving waves in the air.

"It's a complicated story that involves a hefty dose of chaos and an interplay among multiple influences, so extracting a clear signal of the Arctic's role is challenging," said Jennifer Francis, a climate scientist at the Woods Hole Research Center. Several recent papers have made the case for the connection, she noted.

"This symptom of global warming is counterintuitive for those in the cross-hairs of these extreme cold spells," Francis said in an email. "But these events provide an excellent opportunity to help the public understand some of the 'interesting' ways that climate change will unfold." "

https://phys.org/news/2019-01-science-polar-vortex-outbreaks.html

So some do some don't. Definitely NOT a case of no one apart from me has done so.

Dnarever wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2019 at 8:56pm:


I am merely quoting the "science".

lee wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2019 at 9:01pm:


Quote:


Keep telling yourself that Wardy.

The intention is clearly mud in the water.

lee wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2019 at 9:03pm:


Interesting that you follow this topic but have no knowledge of the base facts.

Dnarever wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2019 at 9:34pm:


Ah, Another assumption. 

But still no reference showing where I am wrong.