lee wrote on Apr 21^st, 2019 at 12:13pm:


Oh, that's terrible! You don't have good internet in WA?

You really should complain to your local MP. You tell them you want access to Andrew Bolt, Miranda Divine and all their regional syndications and copycats immediately.

And don't take no for an answer, dear. It'll change your life. You'll be paraphrasing Fox News hosts and pro-carbon think tanks and all the big fossil fuel campaigns in no time, believe me.

Well, more than you do now, anyway.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Apr 21^st, 2019 at 1:55pm:


Oh you mean the one where you couldn't identify which quote you were talking about?

Too bloody funny.

lee wrote on Apr 21^st, 2019 at 4:06pm:


No, the one where you asked me to tell you what you said about Al Gore, remember?

There's only 2 options, you know.

Option 1: Whenever Al or David Suzuki or some movie star says something about global warming, you're meant to accuse them of catching planes.

This, as you just said, is meant to make them look hypocritical because people who acknowledge global warming aren't supposed to do anything that might make CO2.

I've heard they have air-conditioning. Oh, the hypocrites! They even got al Gore for having a party where the caterer served a supposedly endangered fish. Nothing to do with global warming, but you get the idea.

Option 2: Whenever it gets really cold, you say, you see? Global warming really isn't happening at all.

You can do this when it rains or there's no bushfires or whatever you like. Normal weather today - you see? What numpties these alarmists all are.

And that's it. You can repeat these as many times as you like, just like the News Ltd columnists and Fox News hosts do. Any time of the year you want - hypocrites! You see? Numpties.

The rest of the time you can just do what you're doing here - ask lots of distracting questions, move the discussion into other areas, make it personal if need be, just undermine the debate at all costs.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Apr 21^st, 2019 at 4:45pm:



Yes Petal. I gave you three options and you couldn't even trim it to two.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Apr 21^st, 2019 at 4:45pm:


Yes You either have proof or you don't. So far the money is on "you don't".

lee wrote on Apr 21^st, 2019 at 5:08pm:


So true, Lee. I have no idea where all your posts are.

If you thought this was important, you'd go out and look.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Apr 21^st, 2019 at 5:25pm:


Yes. We have known for some time you have no idea.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Apr 21^st, 2019 at 5:25pm:


But you are the one making the assertions of what I said. Your claims - you prove it.

lee wrote on Apr 21^st, 2019 at 5:44pm:


But you know you said it. You agree with yourself.

Now if you want proof that you self-indulgently derail threads on climate change, here's your proof.

Please don't ask me when we're having the same discussion next year, dear, just agree with yourself.

Do you want to state anything else you believe, or is that all?

No, I think Lee's point is they had hurricanes before 1980 too, FD.

That's option 3. If something really bad happens and everybody says it's caused by global warming, you say, yes but they had weather in the old days too, you know.