freediver wrote on Nov 3
rd, 2017 at 12:13pm:
lso, didn't your link about the Congo say a lot of the deaths were caused by drought? Have you read it?
Does it FD? Lets see - go to the article and press ctrl-f and type in the word "drought". How many hits do you get? Never mind, I'll save you the trouble, we know you have an aversion to actually reading sources. Its zero, nada, zilch. Oh, and just for fun, why not do the same for "weather". Oh what the hell, lets try "climate". Can you guess how many hits there are?
But it makes me curious, where did you get that nonsense about drought?
And just think, you're the one asking me if I've read it.
from my link:
Quote: It is argued that the reduction in the Congo was atypical and can be attributed to the direct and indirect effects of colonial rule and especially to disease and falling birthrate
hmmm now where have I seen that quote before? Oh thats right, the time I posted it before, in this thread, which you ignored.
freediver wrote on Nov 3
rd, 2017 at 12:13pm:
Would you agree that it was actually you 'copping out' by demanding I guess the numbers for you? Would you agree that saying one number is greater than another number, and asking people whether they agree with you, while refusing to say what either number is, is particularly stupid?
I was actually inviting you to use your common sense. I kinda figured that the establishment of (by far) the largest programs of invasion and conquest and ethnic cleansing the world has ever seen - the first time that such a program had global reach, the first time in which entire continents were conquered and in many cases cleansed of natives - by the many millions - is self-evidently a level of slaughter and destruction not seen before in history. Also, the irony of you, on so many previous occasions refusing to cite evidence for your claims while hiding behind the most absurd "I defer to common sense" justifications - is not lost on me.
freediver wrote on Nov 3
rd, 2017 at 12:13pm:
s it also a cop-out when you include disease and weather among your causes
and you would of course be referring to the non-existent reference to weather in my Congo article yes?
FD, did you know I've cited 2 articles to demonstrate the level of carnage European imperialism inflicted? I feel I need to ask, since you have proven so clueless as to just about everything I have posted in this thread. Now to be fair I can't recall if the Latin American one mentions weather - but I can say that both articles cite evidence supporting the idea that the effects of colonialism caused, indirectly or directly, the death toll. I have highlighted these relevant parts of both articles - more than once. And yet still you insist I am including unrelated causes to the deaths.
Remember that point about you not listening to what people say that I keep banging on about?