Quote:Also, whose definition of "arab diseases" am I mischaracterising? Yours? Hillarious
I did not accuse you of mischaracterising anyone's definition. You are trying to avoid characterising your own.
Quote:Lets start with finding a quote of me describing "arab diseases" as "European diseases"
Why?
polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 10
th, 2018 at 1:26pm:
Thats a great question FD.
You might also want to ponder over when people in Europe became "European", and why did they stop being "Africans"... are Dingos considered bone fide "native" Australian animals now? If so, when exactly did that happen? Questions, questions...
Let's try again Gandalf. Why, other than convenient racism, does it stop being an Indian or Arab disease, despite not evolving into a new race, but it is forever a European disease?
freediver wrote on Apr 9
th, 2018 at 2:14pm:
[quote]My definition, which is coincidentally also the bleeding obvious, common sense definition, is based on who brought it and where they brought it from. So if European people brought a disease to a another continent from Europe (irrespective of who might have originally brought it to Europe hundreds of years earlier), I say its a "European disease". Is it correct to say that this concept still flies over your head?
What if Indians bought the disease to the Arabs, Arabs brought the disease to Europe, Europeans landed it somewhere in the Americas, and then native Americans brought it to other parts of the Americas? Is it still a European disease?
Or does it only count if they use ships rather than beautiful Muslim camels?