Setanta
Gold Member
   
Offline

\/ Peace man!
Posts: 16804
Northern NSW
Gender:
|
TheGreenLight wrote on Mar 13 th, 2014 at 9:01pm: [ftp][/ftp] Aussie wrote on Mar 13 th, 2014 at 8:41pm: TheGreenLight wrote on Mar 13 th, 2014 at 7:44pm: I turn 65 soon, and i am not entitled to receive a pension. I have saved all my life, and apparently too much, I can live off of the money and Super that I have saved over the years. I know people who have blown all of their money, or at least a lot of it, and they get $20,000 a year from the taxpayer, and I get bigger all. Both sides do this, Labor and the Coalition. Why is this? Where is the incentive to save, where is the incentive to be prudent and wise with your money? Why do we reward those who waste their money? bugger I have completely lost it with all sides of politics in this country. All good points, but I'm not so sure about people wasting their money etc. You, like me, are one of the Baby Boomers. There are zillions of us and we are causing a transitional nightmare. Few of us have meaningful 'super,' because it was not compulsory when we were making any worthwhile money. It was only later in our working life that the 'super' came along, so we are behind the eight ball......with Super. Only one other alternative, which is the Aged Pension. I understand where you're coming from, but let me give you an example. A bfriend of mine and i earned roughly the same amount of money all our lives. He had to have the best of everything. Every time we'd go out for lunch or dinner he'd order one of the most expensive meals on the menu. He wasted his money like it was going out of his fashion, and hardly saved a dime. I scrimped and saved all my life, when I was married and when I was single. Now that he's blown his, he is entitled to taxpayer money at the rate of $20,000 a year. I am entitled to stuff all. You have it better than your friend now, you don't get what he gets because you do not need it. Welfare is supposed to be needs based. Sure, have a thorn in your toe, but would you really trade places with him now? Perhaps you want him to suffer a bit, guaranteed on the OAP he will be, it's not cream. As Aussie said, super was not even there for most people, it only came in, introduced by Labor as a trade off to wage rises, in 1991?(I think) so most people, unless they were pretty well off had a well justified expectation that the pension would look after them. That's not the case, the OAP sucks and is barely liveable if you are married and pay rent, if you are single I hope the bridges in your area are not too drafty. Think about all those not like your friend.. And why didn't you tell him off back then and tell him he was a bludger.
|