Quote:"Christianity" - as in "Christian civilization" has transformed into a irreligious, secular force. There are two sides to it - on the one hand it has brought democracy and freedom and human rights to the nations that created it. On the other hand, it has brought neo-colonialism, oppression and great suffering to most of the third world. Large parts of the non-western world are still reeling from the most horrendous period of genocides and economic rape the world has ever seen.
What did "most of the third world" have before Europe introduced them oppression and suffering?
Did it bring democracy and freedom and human rights to any other nations?
Quote:This oppression continues to this day with the continued economic pillaging of third world resources - to the detriment of the local populations. Mostly this is done by outsourcing the oppression to corrupt native client regimes, but occasionally direct western intervention rears its ugly head - Iraq being the most blatant in recent years, and most recently - Libya. Fanboys like FD will cheer this on as "fighting for freedom" and thus give it legitimacy.
Is our attempt to establish a democratic government in Iraq just another example of our "continued economic pillaging of third world resources"? How about our fight against ISIS? More pillaging? How about a bit of rape?
Quote:Note here that I am not at all saying that IS is necessarily a case of the oppressed defending against the oppressor - I don't see evidence of that at all. IS is clearly an aggressive and expansionist force in its own right. But it exists in a region, and a world of opposing aggressive and expansionist forces
You mean Iraq's new democracy that they are hell bent on destroying?
Quote:Thus we need to dispense with this nonsense that we are the force of good, combating the forces of evil - such that our involvement in these conflicts are entirely about liberating people from oppression.
Right. It is entirely about our "continued economic pillaging of third world resources." You've been reading Falah's old posts haven't you?
Quote:Yes, but Christianity was only ever used by Western civilisation, starting with Constantine, through the crusades, and into the colonial period. Military powers have used Christianity to consolidate their hold on power, using everything from the divine right of kings to the doctrine of papal infailability to the expansionist colonial project of Christening the primitive races. Christianity is as much an ideology as a religion, and the above doctrines had no theological basis. Despite this, they were held as sacred truths for centuries. Heretics who disagreed were tortured and put to death.
As an ideology used by vested powers, Islam is no different. Since the Iranian revolution in the modern era, we’ve seen Islam used in the same way.
You can't think of any earlier examples?
Quote:To me, there’s no difference between the Ayotollah calling for a millennial struggle against the Great Satan and the US president calling for a coalition to defeat the Axis of Evil. When the holy books get used to sell wars, there is little difference between church and state.
Because only religious people use the concept of evil? Or because the US is just as evil as it's enemies?
Quote:It's like suggesting that 'cause the UK and Japan are both Island nations at the periphery of their respective continents, they will have similar outcomes in their societies. Superficial thinking built around superficial understanding.
Actually it had quite a lot to do with their success. Do you think it is a coincidence that Britain is an Island and that their navy conquered the world, while their main competitors were dealing with hostile neighbours with which they shared a land border?
Quote:Not quite true. The major difference is that Europe has suffered no where near the external interference that the Arab world has.
Except of course when the Arab world was trying to conquer Europe, and nearly succeeded.