freediver wrote on Mar 20
th, 2010 at 6:18pm:
Abu seems to think there is one set of rules, and the differences between what states do is down to them not actually following Shariah law.
The stoning bit seems to be universally considered to be part of Shariah law.
Yes - I believe it's in the koran. And Abu may well be right.
But to use another analogy, which state has a purely
lassez fairre economy? No one does because - with the exception, perhaps, of the Wild West - it doesn't gell with democracy.
I'd say the same is probably true of Shariah law in the modern world. In Iran, for example, stoning was recently banned because of legal difficulties over the burden of proof and popular outcries.
What's also important to note with the practice of stoning, is that it was first prescribed in Leviticus for crimes such as breaking the Sabbath.
Islam sees itself as the successor of Judeo-Christianity (without reference, I guess, to whomever has not sinned should cast the first stone). Stoning is certainly not a common practice within Muslim countries. The worst, most barbarous country I can think of is Saudi Arabia, which seems to follow a very purist form of Shariah law.
But it's an American ally, so it's safe.