Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
Send Topic Print
Anorexia or obesity? (Read 46801 times)
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #45 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 8:15pm
 
ian wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 8:02pm:
Fat is the preferred energy source our bodies require and the science also supports this, in any endurance event your body will only utilise carbohydrates for the first 20 minutes or so, then its on to fat afterwards,



The fact that it's the first 20 minutes then onto fat would suggest fat isn't the preferred energy source. 

Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #46 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 8:21pm
 
if you run a 3 hour marathon Honky your body will spend 2 1/2 hours burning fat, this will happen however much carbohydrate you consume. If your body has no carbohydrate it will immediately switch to burning fat. Also you are missing the bit about our evolutionary history, naturally occurring carbohydrates were extremely rare in our ancestors diets, we spent millions of years without them, they only appeared in our diets roughly 5000 years ago, refined sugars around 100 years ago.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #47 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 8:29pm
 
Quote:
If your body has no carbohydrate it will immediately switch to burning fat.


Which also suggests fat isn't the preferred energy source.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #48 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 8:32pm
 
How so? Our ancestors lived without carbohydrates for millions of years, what were they using as an energy source?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #49 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:13pm
 
Did they? Hunter gatherers didn't just live off hunting.  And while their diets were likely much lighter on the carbs than today, it wasn't non existent.  I think you've found your discrepancy.

I don't disagree with the bottom line - I've been smashing a high fat diet for years, but your reasoning, if there is any, is all over the place.  Your own words admit carbs are the bodies preferred energy source, so I'm not really sure what you're arguing about or against.  The ADP/ATP mechanism and glycolysis have been a basic foundation of sports science for decades - it's not a secret that they are only used for relatively short bursts of activity.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:25pm by ... »  

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53324
At my desk.
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #50 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:20pm
 
Perhaps instead of saying "preferred energy source", think "gets rids of them ASAP".
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #51 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:23pm
 
yes. Serious farming which allowed widespread consumption of carbohydrate rich foods such as wheat and rice really only started around 10,000 years ago, Refined carbohydrate such as sugar appeared widely in modern diets around 100 years ago. Im generalising, of course there were exceptions.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #52 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:26pm
 
... wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:13pm:
Did they? Hunter gatherers didn't just live off hunting.  And while their diets were likely much lighter on the carbs than today, it wasn't non existent.  I think you've found your discrepancy.
Stop the semantics, i didnt state non existent, I stated extremely rare.

Quote:
Your own words admit carbs are the bodies preferred energy source,
Ive stated that nowhere. I think you need glasses. Quote:
The ADP/ATP mechanism has been a basic foundation of sports science for decades - it's not a secret that it is only used for relatively short bursts of activity.
so whats your point if you agree?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:31pm by ian »  
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53324
At my desk.
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #53 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:29pm
 
What about sweet potatoes, yams etc etc?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #54 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:32pm
 
ian wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:26pm:
... wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:13pm:
Did they? Hunter gatherers didn't just live off hunting.  And while their diets were likely much lighter on the carbs than today, it wasn't non existent.  I think you've found your discrepancy.
Stop the semantics



It's not semnatics, you've completely overlooked the "gatherer" part.

Quote:
Your own words admit carbs are the bodies preferred energy source,
Ive stated that nowhere. I think you need glasses.

Quote:
If your body has no carbohydrate it will immediately switch to burning fat.

in any endurance event your body will only utilise carbohydrates for the first 20 minutes or so, then its on to fat afterwards,


First = carbs
Second = fat. 

Your words.  IF carbs are first used, and by your own words, it is, it means they are the preferred source, by definition.  Why can you not see the contradiction? 

Quote:
The ADP/ATP mechanism has been a basic foundation of sports science for decades - it's not a secret that it is only used for relatively short bursts of activity.
so whats your point if you agree?
[/quote]

Because you're falling into the same trap as every other diet dickhead - trying to fit everything into a monocausal explanation.

Diet "guru" #1 - "It's not x it's y"
Diet "guru" #2 "it's not y, it's x"

How about it's both, (and likely z as well)? 

Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #55 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:34pm
 
freediver wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:29pm:
What about sweet potatoes, yams etc etc?
sure, full of carbs, but not the same type as in grains, the body processes them differently. Note in  my article i was referring to refined carbs, not all carbs. Honky made the same mistake.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #56 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:36pm
 
... wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:32pm:

Because you're falling into the same trap as every other diet dickhead - trying to fit everything into a monocausal explanation.

Diet "guru" #1 - "It's not x it's y"
Diet "guru" #2 "it's not y, it's x"

How about it's both, (and likely z as well)? 

Im not sure why you think because the body uses carbs first that this means they are the preferred energy source, to my way of thinking the opposite could be true.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #57 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:41pm
 
... wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:32pm:
[
It's not semnatics, you've completely overlooked the "gatherer" part.
no, you completely overlooked the refined carbs part


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #58 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:46pm
 
ian wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:41pm:
... wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:32pm:
[
It's not semnatics, you've completely overlooked the "gatherer" part.
no, you completely overlooked the refined carbs part




The word "refined" didn't appear in your earlier posts. 

ian wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:36pm:
... wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:32pm:

Because you're falling into the same trap as every other diet dickhead - trying to fit everything into a monocausal explanation.

Diet "guru" #1 - "It's not x it's y"
Diet "guru" #2 "it's not y, it's x"

How about it's both, (and likely z as well)? 

Im not sure why you think because the body uses carbs first that this means they are the preferred energy source, to my way of thinking the opposite could be true.



Because that's the definition of the word.   Shocked

There's a hint in the spelling of the word itself PREfer.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Anorexia or obesity?
Reply #59 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 9:47pm
 
You are right Honky, I didnt proof read it. Shoot me. Prefer doesnt mean to use something first.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
Send Topic Print