Quote:It's still a discouragement, having to fish somewhwere less safe
Again, you should start with what I actually say, which is the opposite. It would leave the safer spots open. I have actually made a request to the authorities for a plan change, based on this justification, and seen zoning regulations changed during the public feedback phase for the benefit of boat fishermen.
Quote:anglers avoid areas with them
Because it is illegal to fish there?
Quote:or the participation rate declines
Do you have any evidence of that?
Quote:Ingnorance - the Sydney rocks are very productive, what makes you think otherwise?
Of course they are - relatively speaking. Hence the crowds. But relative to what?
Quote:Have you thought there might be a reason why they are not productive, eg lack of natural fish holding features, food sources etc?
Of course. But to be honest you have to admit that overfishing plays a massive part in that, and reducing the impact of overfishing will make it more productive. The article makes it quite clear that it will not be magic and they won't be as productive as more remote areas, but it will be an improvement.
Quote:PS: you haven't though about catchability either.
Thanks for the suggestion. My proposal will significantly increase catchability for shore based fishing, because they will be fishing adjacent to an area where fishing is excluded and the fish are less likely to elarn to avoid being caught. I will add that to the article.