Australian Politics Forum - Kash Patel is a lying turd

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55847
Gender: male

Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #30 - May 16^th, 2025 at 4:08pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:40pm:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:32pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:26pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:15pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:11pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 12:29pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:25am:

John Smith wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:18am:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 8:53am:

Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California

I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin

dam hilarious

Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.

How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?

The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.

For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.

Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school? Roll Eyes

They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..

Ignoring a judicial order is against the law.

FFS, how do you remember to breathe?

"Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable."

TDS again, ...

Changing the subject again when proven wrong.

How very freediver of you.

Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 149360
Gender: male

Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #31 - May 16^th, 2025 at 4:21pm

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:40pm:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:32pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:26pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:15pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:11pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 12:29pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:25am:

John Smith wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:18am:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 8:53am:

Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California

I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin

dam hilarious

Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.

How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?

The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.

For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.

Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school? Roll Eyes

They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..

Ignoring a judicial order is against the law.

FFS, how do you remember to breathe?

"Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable."

TDS again, ...

Changing the subject again when proven wrong.

How very freediver of you.

Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk.

White flag accepted.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Leroy

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4482
Gender: male

Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #32 - May 16^th, 2025 at 4:31pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:21pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:40pm:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:32pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:26pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:15pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:11pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 12:29pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:25am:

John Smith wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:18am:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 8:53am:

Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California

I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin

dam hilarious

Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.

How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?

The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.

For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.

Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school? Roll Eyes

They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..

Ignoring a judicial order is against the law.

FFS, how do you remember to breathe?

"Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable."

TDS again, ...

Changing the subject again when proven wrong.

How very freediver of you.

Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk.

White flag accepted.

Yes your white flag is officially accepted, so please try and keep your TDS in check in future.

Back to top

Trump derangement syndrome
Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment"

Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55847
Gender: male

Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #33 - May 16^th, 2025 at 5:42pm

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:21pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:40pm:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:32pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:26pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:15pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:11pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 12:29pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:25am:

John Smith wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:18am:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 8:53am:

Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California

I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin

dam hilarious

Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.

How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?

The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.

For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.

Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school? Roll Eyes

They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..

Ignoring a judicial order is against the law.

FFS, how do you remember to breathe?

"Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable."

TDS again, ...

Changing the subject again when proven wrong.

How very freediver of you.

Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk.

White flag accepted.

Yes your white flag is officially accepted, so please try and keep your TDS in check in future.

Exactly. Punk's balls are nailed to the floor.
They always say 'white flag accepted' when their balls are nailed to the floor. Everybody knows that.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 149360
Gender: male

Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #34 - May 16^th, 2025 at 5:42pm

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 5:42pm:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:21pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:40pm:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:32pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:26pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:15pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:11pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 12:29pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:25am:

John Smith wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:18am:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 8:53am:

Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California

I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin

dam hilarious

Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.

How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?

The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.

For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.

Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school? Roll Eyes

They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..

Ignoring a judicial order is against the law.

FFS, how do you remember to breathe?

"Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable."

TDS again, ...

Changing the subject again when proven wrong.

How very freediver of you.

Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk.

White flag accepted.

Yes your white flag is officially accepted, so please try and keep your TDS in check in future.

Exactly. Punk's balls are nailed to the floor.
They always say 'white flag accepted' when their balls are nailed to the floor. Everybody knows that.

White flag accepted.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55847
Gender: male

Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #35 - May 16^th, 2025 at 5:44pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 5:42pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 5:42pm:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:21pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:40pm:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:32pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:26pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:15pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:11pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 12:29pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:25am:

John Smith wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:18am:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 8:53am:

Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California

I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin

dam hilarious

Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.

How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?

The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.

For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.

Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school? Roll Eyes

They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..

Ignoring a judicial order is against the law.

FFS, how do you remember to breathe?

"Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable."

TDS again, ...

Changing the subject again when proven wrong.

How very freediver of you.

Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk.

White flag accepted.

Yes your white flag is officially accepted, so please try and keep your TDS in check in future.

Exactly. Punk's balls are nailed to the floor.
They always say 'white flag accepted' when their balls are nailed to the floor. Everybody knows that.

White flag accepted.

Thank you, Bbwiyawn.

Carry on.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 149360
Gender: male

Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #36 - May 16^th, 2025 at 5:45pm

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 5:44pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 5:42pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 5:42pm:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:21pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:40pm:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:32pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:26pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:15pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:11pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 12:29pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:25am:

John Smith wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:18am:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 8:53am:

Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California

I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin

dam hilarious

Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.

How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?

The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.

For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.

Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school? Roll Eyes

They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..

Ignoring a judicial order is against the law.

FFS, how do you remember to breathe?

"Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable."

TDS again, ...

Changing the subject again when proven wrong.

How very freediver of you.

Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk.

White flag accepted.

Yes your white flag is officially accepted, so please try and keep your TDS in check in future.

Exactly. Punk's balls are nailed to the floor.
They always say 'white flag accepted' when their balls are nailed to the floor. Everybody knows that.

White flag accepted.

Thank you, Bbwiyawn.

Carry on.

White flag accepted.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 55847 Gender:	Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd Reply #37 - May 16^th, 2025 at 6:01pm You are avoiding the crux of the matter, punk. How to enforce the judge's orders? Any thoughts, punk? (No) Or are you just a wind- up monkey with cymbals? (Yes)
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 149360 Gender:	Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd Reply #38 - May 16^th, 2025 at 6:05pm Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 6:01pm: You are avoiding the crux of the matter, ... No. You are changing the subject because you were proven wrong. However, I have graciously accepted your white flag.
Back to top	« Last Edit: May 16^th, 2025 at 6:13pm by greggerypeccary » GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55847
Gender: male

Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #39 - May 16^th, 2025 at 6:13pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 6:05pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 6:01pm:

You are avoiding the crux of the matter, ...

No.

You are changing the subject because you were proven wrong.

However, I have gracefully accepted your white flag.

You are lying, punk, as you always do.

1 you have not shown how Patel lied.

2 you have not shown how judicial orders about a deported gangsters can be enforced

3. You have not shown what jurisdiction a NY federal judge could possibly have over Executive powers of conducting foreign policy, powers under which Garcia was deported.

4. You have not shown what powers anyone in the US, executive or judicial, have to facilitate the removal of an El Salvadorean prison inmate from prison and transport him to the US.

Keep banging your cymbals, monkey.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100476

Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #40 - May 17^th, 2025 at 3:10pm

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:32pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:26pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:15pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:11pm:

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 12:29pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:25am:

John Smith wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:18am:

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 8:53am:

Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California

I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin

dam hilarious

Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.

How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?

The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.

For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.

Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school? Roll Eyes

They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..

Ignoring a judicial order is against the law.

FFS, how do you remember to breathe?

"Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable."

TDS again, the president of El Salvador Nayib Armando Bukele Ortez, the country where Garcia is a citizen has told the US that he is not returning Garcia to the US. What is the US judge going to do, put Nayib Armando Bukele Ortez of El Salvador in prison or is he going to order the US military to invade El Salvador and kidnap Garcia.

Oh, I see! So you're blaming these tinted tinpot dictators, are you? These cruel third world banana republics, so mean and nasty to their fellow citizens.

Well, I'm curious. Why is Uncle footing the bill? Why is Uncle currently paying for an entire maximum security prison in El Salvador to house people indefinitely?

Even convicts sent to Australia were released or granted reprieve. DL's prisoners don't even get a trial. Think of that - 18th century England was more humane that 21st century America.

FD never answered questions, Leroy.

You?

Back to top

« Last Edit: May 17^th, 2025 at 3:17pm by Karnal »

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 116230
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #41 - May 17^th, 2025 at 4:14pm

Karnal wrote on May 17^th, 2025 at 3:10pm:

Oh, I see! So you're blaming these tinted tinpot dictators, are you? These cruel third world banana republics, so mean and nasty to their fellow citizens.

Well, I'm curious. Why is Uncle footing the bill? Why is Uncle currently paying for an entire maximum security prison in El Salvador to house people indefinitely?

Even convicts sent to Australia were released or granted reprieve. DL's prisoners don't even get a trial. Think of that - 18th century England was more humane that 21st century America.

FD never answered questions, Leroy.

You?

Karnal,
do you know - the man he likes you? - he really likes you.

Back to top

IP Logged