Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Kash Patel is a lying turd (Read 454 times)
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28177
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #15 - May 16th, 2025 at 9:17am
 
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




DEFLECT, DEFLECT, DEFLECT!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 149340
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #16 - May 16th, 2025 at 9:20am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 9:17am:
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




DEFLECT, DEFLECT, DEFLECT!!!


You've certainly triggered Leroy   Smiley
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55812
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #17 - May 16th, 2025 at 9:52am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 6:07am:
He can't even look Capitol Police in the eye, nor can he tell the truth after being caught blatantly lying by Senator Schiff...




Schtiff is verbaling him.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #18 - May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am
 
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin Grin Grin Grin

dam hilarious
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28177
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #19 - May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am
 
John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am:
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin Grin Grin Grin

dam hilarious


Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #20 - May 16th, 2025 at 12:25pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am:
John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am:
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin Grin Grin Grin

dam hilarious


Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.



AND whats worse, his supporters cheer him on for doing so Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55812
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #21 - May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am:
John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am:
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin Grin Grin Grin

dam hilarious


Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28177
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #22 - May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm
 
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am:
John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am:
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin Grin Grin Grin

dam hilarious


Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.


How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 149340
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #23 - May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm:
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am:
John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am:
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin Grin Grin Grin

dam hilarious


Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.


How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?


The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.


For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55812
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #24 - May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm:
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am:
John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am:
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin Grin Grin Grin

dam hilarious


Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.


How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?


The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.


For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 149340
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #25 - May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm
 
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm:
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am:
John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am:
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin Grin Grin Grin

dam hilarious


Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.


How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?


The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.


For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.



Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school?   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55812
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #26 - May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm:
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm:
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am:
John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am:
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin Grin Grin Grin

dam hilarious


Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.


How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?


The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.


For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.



Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school?   Roll Eyes


They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 149340
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #27 - May 16th, 2025 at 3:32pm
 
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm:
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm:
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am:
John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am:
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin Grin Grin Grin

dam hilarious


Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.


How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?


The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.


For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.



Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school?   Roll Eyes


They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..




Ignoring a judicial order is against the law.

FFS, how do you remember to breathe?

"Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable."
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Leroy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4475
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #28 - May 16th, 2025 at 3:36pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:32pm:
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm:
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm:
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am:
John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am:
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin Grin Grin Grin

dam hilarious


Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.


How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?


The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.


For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.



Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school?   Roll Eyes


They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..




Ignoring a judicial order is against the law.

FFS, how do you remember to breathe?

"Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable."


TDS again, the president of El Salvador Nayib Armando Bukele Ortez, the country where Garcia is a citizen has told the US that he is not returning Garcia to the US. What is the US judge going to do, put Nayib Armando Bukele Ortez of El Salvador in prison or is he going to order the US military to invade El Salvador and kidnap Garcia.
Back to top
 

Trump derangement syndrome
Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment"

Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 149340
Gender: male
Re: Kash Patel is a lying turd
Reply #29 - May 16th, 2025 at 3:40pm
 
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:32pm:
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm:
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm:
Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am:
John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am:
Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am:
Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California




I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

Grin Grin Grin Grin

dam hilarious


Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.


How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?


The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.


For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.



Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school?   Roll Eyes


They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..




Ignoring a judicial order is against the law.

FFS, how do you remember to breathe?

"Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable."


TDS again, ...



Changing the subject again when proven wrong.

How very freediver of you.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print