Brian Ross wrote on Aug 7^th, 2025 at 1:56pm:



And that's why you post almost nothing but ABC headlines and twighlight zone, always with tut tut and eyerolling.

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 7^th, 2025 at 3:50pm:

Yeah, on your Defence forum sandpit where no disagreement is tolerated and so you are virtually the only poster there.
You talk to yourself there, although still mostly in ABC headlines.

Oh, and the "what Sandy Stone is 'presently' watching" film reviews.

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 7^th, 2025 at 3:50pm:


They can call for as many elections as they like. It won't make a shred of difference. Swapping one suit for another doesn't change the agenda. Whether it's Starmer, Badenoch, Farage, Davey, or some other polished puppet, they're all cut from the same globalist cloth - indoctrinated, interchangeable, obedient. They don't lead. They manage decline. And they do it with a smile.

The public senses something is deeply wrong, and they're right. But here's the hard truth: the problem isn't just the face in No.10. It's the machine behind it - the transnational system of unelected bureaucrats, NGOs, global finance, and supranational bodies that now run the show. Westminster is no longer sovereign. It takes its cues from Brussels, Davos, and the endless alphabet soup of "partnership" initiatives, "shared values," and "global commitments." Elections have become theatre. The script never changes.

And this isn't just about open borders. It's about a calculated demolition of Western identity itself - cultural, moral, and national. The architects of this system know exactly what they're doing. They use Islam not because they share its values, but because it's useful. It is the perfect battering ram: immune from criticism, protected by law, and wrapped in the language of minority rights.

The Leftist-Islamist alliance is no accident. It's a marriage of convenience. The hard Left despises the West - its history, its traditions, its moral foundations. Islamists do too. So they march together. The Left supplies the cover: decolonisation, diversity, inclusion. The Islamists supply the fire: demographic weight, religious fervour, and a ready-made alternative order built on submission. Together, they erode everything that holds a civilisation together - family, faith, free speech, the rule of law.

This is why every government looks the same. Because they all serve the same purpose: to keep the borders open, suppress dissent, and reshape the West into something unrecognisable - a borderless economic zone, fragmented by culture, cowed by ideology, and stripped of the will to defend itself.

So yes, 100,000 signatures shows people are fed up. But they need to understand what they're up against. This is not a battle of parties. It's a battle of paradigms. And until we break from this globalist consensus, voting will just reshuffle the deck while the house continues to burn.

"They use Islam not because they share its values, but because it's useful. It is the perfect battering ram: immune from criticism, protected by law, and wrapped in the language of minority rights."
https://x.com/JChimirie66677/status/1953228756585156793

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 7^th, 2025 at 9:13pm:

Women and mothers turned out at the protests in London and Epping Forest, along with local professionals like Maxi Gorynski, an IT worker who helps organise a local residents’ group in Canary Wharf opposed to housing asylum seekers at the Britannia International. There were also scores of legal migrants; understandably annoyed that they came here via proper means and worked hard while rule-breakers receive freebies. These protesters can’t easily be dismissed as mere far-right agitators, however much the government might like to try.

A friend of mine, a Serviceman, is currently living in temporary accommodation because all the available Married Quarters, designed for military personnel with wives and families, had been taken up by Afghans and other migrants (some of whom have questionable claims to asylum in the first place). Instead, my friend is being housed in a budget hotel; in considerably worse conditions than the four-star accommodation many illegal migrants are enjoying in places like Canary Wharf and Warwick. There is a grim irony here; while the government finds endless hotel rooms for foreign fighting-age men, our actual fighting men are forced into cramped budget accommodation.

Meanwhile councils are being forced to bid on the same housing stock for emergency social housing, meaning British subjects in actual need are being weighed against – and often losing out to – migrants. Though the government boasts that fewer hotels are now in use, of course the migrants haven’t magically disappeared. They’ve simply been shunted from hotels into HMOs and rental accommodation.

The authorities are evidently eager to give away as little as possible; the Online Safety Act has been used to suppress footage of protesters while the National Security Online Information Team, a shady and secretive unit within the Department for Science, Technology and Innovation, has deployed terrorist-tracking software to monitor critics of asylum hotels. Yet in the age of social media it simply isn’t possible to conceal information as it was in the past. YouTubers regularly sneak into migrant hotels and livestream the whole thing to their followers. Social media has made people hyper-vigilant to the signs of the latest HMO occupancy in their neighbourhood. Enough people either live near a hotel themselves or hear stories from a friend who does. When the history of this era is written, the decision to shuttle migrants into provincial towns and hope no one will notice will be seen as fatal.

It’s famously hard to pinpoint the exact moment when public opinion shifts in such a way that it cannot be shifted again, the point when grumbling becomes action, when a population finally becomes fed up. It’s generally easier to diagnose after the fact, when the effects of the snapping have become all too clear. After all, on the day the Bastille was stormed, Louis XVI wrote one word in his diary: ‘rien’ (nothing). I cannot tell you exactly when it happened but I do think we have reached the point where, on the issue of the small boats crisis, middle England has snapped.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/migration-has-radicalised-middle-england/

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 9^th, 2025 at 3:51pm:



I am always persecuted for being a scientist.

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 9^th, 2025 at 8:40pm:



Jump to 1:32