Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10
Send Topic Print
Pauline Hanson (Read 7474 times)
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59987
Here
Gender: male
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #75 - Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:10pm
 
Frank wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 6:59pm:
JiDnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 6:48pm:
Frank wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:14am:
PDnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 11:55pm:
Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:13pm:
Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:10pm:
Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:04pm:
Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 5:35pm:
Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 3:51pm:
Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:20pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm:
What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World?

Asking for a friend....


Tucker is a fascist worm

Grin Cheesy

How do you know, ducky? Do you listen to him? When was the last time you did?  Or are you just regurgitating what someone regurgitated for you?



Remember when Tuckers lead writer was a white nationalist, they sacked him after about 10 years of ranting on his view without noticing and Tuckers content didn't change. He is still on things like his replacement theory etc.

The story is that Tucker was always fully aware of that guys beliefs and liked them.

So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says.

Your view of him is entirely second hand. As of everything else. I don't think you have had an idea of your own for decades. And that's just how you like it, an millions like you.





Quote:
So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says.


No never said that.

Nobody could possibly listen to a lot of his whiney pathetic voice and the garbage he spews out. However I never said that I have never listened to anything in his broadcast. I have been exposed to way too much of his garbage over the years.

There is no way that you could listen to him and then think that he was right about anything.


How do you know it's garbage if you never hear him out, dicky ducky?  You let your thinking done for you by others- so prog, so herd.

Lazy, stupid.


One of the fundamental requirements of disagreement is that you UNDERSTAND what the person you disagree with is saying. But never actually listening to what he says, you cannot possibly disagree with him.

You are just a mindless drone, repeating second hand bollocks that excuses you from listening, thinking, articulating.  And that's just on Carlson. You are utterly ignorant of everything else you 'disagree' with - you never heard or read what you 'disagree' with. You are a herd drongo.  And there are so many of you.




His own network label him a liar and they are right.



Nonsense, ducky.  You are just regurgigating nonsense from hit pieces from hir rival media sources. As does Mothra.

Just labelling him with the same old slogans -  hate monger, conspiracy theorist. These do not mean anything, you lot have been letting off such empty puffery for years, directed at anyone you cannot refute or counter with intelligent argument.


Likewise with Hanson. She is not a sophisticate and that is precisely her great value in parliament. She is the little boy who point out that the Emperor has no clothes. - not the apparatchik with a law degree lying doggo and barking or wagging his tale,  as required by the party. 


No it is what Fox said in court in the dominion case. They explained to the judge that Tuckers opinion pieces were something that everyone knows is untrue. There position was that everyone knows that Tuckers word is not to be trusted so nobody would have believed what he said against Dominion.

Lyind, ducky, you are lying.

Why?



Dear Frank - see post 74 as example. No it is correct, a judge even ruled that Tuckers words are of no value and threw the case out.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 77073
Gender: male
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #76 - Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:31pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:07pm:
Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed.

Quote:
A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously.


Quote:
The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes."

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020...



Oppss ..... another fail for Sore end Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51449
Gender: male
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #77 - Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:54pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:07pm:
Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed.

Quote:
A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously.


Quote:
The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes."

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020...

Opinion.

Not 'lies'. opinion. 

But you, being completely unable to counter his argument, simply label it a 'lie' so you do not have to present your own opinion - which then could be subject to analysis and refutation.

We see through your cowardly rhetoric and agit-prop, ducky. Too transparent, too obvious, too thick and silly.



Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 143954
Gender: male
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #78 - Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:57pm
 
Frank wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:54pm:
Dnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:07pm:
Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed.

Quote:
A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously.


Quote:
The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes."

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020...

Opinion.

Not 'lies'. opinion. 

But you, being completely unable to counter his argument, simply label it a 'lie' so you do not have to present your own opinion - which then could be subject to analysis and refutation.

We see through your cowardly rhetoric and agit-prop, ducky. Too transparent, too obvious, too thick and silly.





I'm guessing an ideal Saturday night for you is Tucker in your ass, Donald in your mouth, and Putin pissing over the three of you - yeah?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51449
Gender: male
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #79 - Sep 30th, 2022 at 8:00pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:57pm:
Frank wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:54pm:
Dnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:07pm:
Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed.

Quote:
A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously.


Quote:
The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes."

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020...

Opinion.

Not 'lies'. opinion. 

But you, being completely unable to counter his argument, simply label it a 'lie' so you do not have to present your own opinion - which then could be subject to analysis and refutation.

We see through your cowardly rhetoric and agit-prop, ducky. Too transparent, too obvious, too thick and silly.





I'm guessing an ideal Saturday night for you is Tucker in your ass, Donald in your mouth, and Putin pissing over the three of you - yeah?




There, wee bufty, your intellectual equal, your comrade in arms in the great struggle to clear the S bend  - a piece of Slovenian shite struggling to go past the S bend but never managing it. Float like a turd, stink like a gweggy.
Commune with him, he is your kind of POS.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 30th, 2022 at 8:07pm by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 143954
Gender: male
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #80 - Sep 30th, 2022 at 8:08pm
 
Frank wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 8:00pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:57pm:
Frank wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:54pm:
Dnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:07pm:
Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed.

Quote:
A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously.


Quote:
The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes."

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020...

Opinion.

Not 'lies'. opinion. 

But you, being completely unable to counter his argument, simply label it a 'lie' so you do not have to present your own opinion - which then could be subject to analysis and refutation.

We see through your cowardly rhetoric and agit-prop, ducky. Too transparent, too obvious, too thick and silly.





I'm guessing an ideal Saturday night for you is Tucker in your ass, Donald in your mouth, and Putin pissing over the three of you - yeah?




There, wee bufty, your intellectual equal, your comrade in arms in the great struggle to clear the S bend  - a piece of Slovenian shite struggling to go past the S bend but never managing it. Float like a turd, stink like a gweggy.
Commune with him, he is your kind of POS.



You strike me as a swallower.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59987
Here
Gender: male
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #81 - Sep 30th, 2022 at 8:22pm
 
Frank wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:54pm:
Dnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:07pm:
Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed.

Quote:
A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously.


Quote:
The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes."

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020...

Opinion.

Not 'lies'. opinion. 

But you, being completely unable to counter his argument, simply label it a 'lie' so you do not have to present your own opinion - which then could be subject to analysis and refutation.

We see through your cowardly rhetoric and agit-prop, ducky. Too transparent, too obvious, too thick and silly.





Here is the problem - Tucked did know that Biden won the election, He did know that Chavez didn't rig the 2020 election or that no Italian space lasers were not used to rig the election.

Quote:
Not 'lies'. opinion.
 

Opinions that the judge said nobody with a full load of fruit would ever believe?

So now after spruiking Tucker and his commentary you are reduced to demanding that Tucker's opinions pieces are as nutty as a fruit cake, that nobody believes them and that his opinion is worthless. You seem to have finally arrived at where the rest of us started.

Now we have these options left on the table

1) Was Tucker lying?
2) Is Tucker as dumb as a dead frog?
3) All of the above.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 87681
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #82 - Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm
 
Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond?

FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago.

Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first.....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 98425
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #83 - Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:00pm
 
Frank wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:54pm:
Dnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:07pm:
Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed.

Quote:
A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously.


Quote:
The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes."

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020...

Opinion.

Not 'lies'. opinion. 



I know, right? The courts just post opinion.

Quote:
McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLC, No. 1:2019cv11161 - Document 39 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)


https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2019cv111...

Infotainment:

Quote:
You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers


https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tu...

Editorial:

Quote:
Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously


https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020...

Analysis:

Quote:
A judge uses Tucker Carlson’s own words against Fox News


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/09/judge-uses-tucker-carlsons-ow...

Alternative facts:

Quote:
Tucker Carlson Successfully Argues Nobody Really Believes Tucker Carlson Is Reporting Facts


https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/greedy-associates/tucker-carlson-successfully...

Overstatement:

Quote:
Tucker Carlson Says He Doesn’t Lie on Purpose, But ‘When I Get Pissed, I Do Tend to Overstate’


https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-fox-news-doesnt-lie-admit-overstate/

Truthful hyperbole:

Quote:
The ‘Tucker Carlson defense’: It can’t be slander if no reasonable person would believe it.


https://www.courierherald.com/opinion/the-tucker-carlson-defense/

Lies:

Quote:
Tucker Carlson says he lies when ‘I’m really cornered or something’


https://thehill.com/homenews/media/572224-tucker-carlson-says-he-lies-on-show-wh...

Granulaid (more lies):

Quote:
Fox News host Tucker Carlson tells interviewer: ‘I lie’


https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/sep/14/fox-news-host-tucker-carlson-i-lie

Alternative facts:

Quote:
Nixing Libel Suit, Judge Says No One Expected Facts From ‘Bloviating’ Tucker Carlson


https://www.courthousenews.com/nixing-libel-suit-judge-says-no-one-expected-fact...

Mendacious, tendentious:

Quote:
Tucker Carlson admits he’s a liar, but ‘tries’ not to lie on television


https://www.nydailynews.com/snyde/ny-tucker-carlson-admits-liar-20210914-g3qusuy...

Yeah-but-no-but:

Quote:
Tucker Carlson admits he lies on his show: 'I really try not to... [but] I certainly do'


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/tucker-carlson-fox-news-dave-r...

Freeeeedom, innit:

Quote:
"Fox admits they lie" and, under the First Amendment, "have the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on public airwaves."


https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2014/sep/10/facebook-posts/facebook-post-c...

Shurely shome mishtake:

Quote:
Judge Rules Tucker Carlson Is Not a Credible Source of News


https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/09/judge-rules-fox-news-tucker-carlson-...

Intelligence and integrity:

Quote:
Tucker Carlson said he lies on TV out of 'weakness' and when he gets 'really cornered


https://sports.yahoo.com/tucker-carlson-said-lies-tv-074836299.html

And on and on. Page after page of falsehoods, alternative facts, and planned, deliberate, out and out lies, all confessed and out there for everyone to see.

Except you. University of Balogney, innit.

You.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 98425
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #84 - Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:13pm
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm:
Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond?

FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago.

Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first.....


Nigel Farrage had a point too.

Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles.

Cunning, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51449
Gender: male
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #85 - Oct 1st, 2022 at 8:30am
 
Karnal wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:13pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm:
Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond?

FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago.

Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first.....


Nigel Farrage had a point too.

Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles.

Cunning, no?


Bollox.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-your-right-to-work-in-the-uk-eu-eea-and-swiss-citizens


The UK introduced an Australian style points system. Those Poles and EU citizens who were already in the UK in 2020 are not affected.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 98425
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #86 - Oct 1st, 2022 at 3:43pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 8:30am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:13pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm:
Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond?

FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago.

Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first.....


Nigel Farrage had a point too.

Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles.

Cunning, no?


Bollox.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-your-right-to-work-in-the-uk-eu-eea-and-swiss-citizens


The UK introduced an Australian style points system. Those Poles and EU citizens who were already in the UK in 2020 are not affected.


Oh, I see. So after 2020, those Poles have as much right to work as any old garden-variety Paki, eh?

Yes, I see what you mean, dear boy. Mother is minding her manners. She's being equal and inclusive and liber...

Superior Culture, innit. To date, Brexit is estimated to have cost Mother 4% of her GDP, £32 bil a year in government revenue and at least £450 a year for each of her children.

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/brexit-will-cost-uk-workers-470-pounds-year-stu...

Forget all the additional red tape, border queues, food shortages, extra taxes and tariffs, job lay-offs and business closures. The UK is now in the grip of what is predicted to be a long term recession, with no way out, all because of policies you espouse.

But I'm curious. Who would try to defend the integrity of Tucker Carlson? It's an impossible task, possibly even tougher than defending Brexit, which you spruiked here for years.

This can only be done by spreading lies, telling fibs, evading, obscuring and living in a surreal echo chamber of fake news - news that even Tucker says is made up in order to get ratings, as is his self-professed right in a free society.

Yes, Tucker admits it. He tells lies, and he thinks you shouldn't believe him. His entire agenda is just a bit of fun, a fake news business model; infotainment. So who would possibly try to defend him as sincere?

Very few, old boy:

You.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 1st, 2022 at 5:12pm by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51449
Gender: male
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #87 - Oct 2nd, 2022 at 11:11am
 
Karnal wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 3:43pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 8:30am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:13pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm:
Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond?

FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago.

Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first.....


Nigel Farrage had a point too.

Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles.

Cunning, no?


Bollox.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-your-right-to-work-in-the-uk-eu-eea-and-swiss-citizens


The UK introduced an Australian style points system. Those Poles and EU citizens who were already in the UK in 2020 are not affected.


Oh, I see. So after 2020, those Poles have as much right to work as any old garden-variety Paki, eh?

Yes, I see what you mean, dear boy. Mother is minding her manners. She's being equal and inclusive and liber...

Superior Culture, innit. To date, Brexit is estimated to have cost Mother 4% of her GDP, £32 bil a year in government revenue and at least £450 a year for each of her children.

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/brexit-will-cost-uk-workers-470-pounds-year-stu...

Forget all the additional red tape, border queues, food shortages, extra taxes and tariffs, job lay-offs and business closures. The UK is now in the grip of what is predicted to be a long term recession, with no way out, all because of policies you espouse.

But I'm curious. Who would try to defend the integrity of Tucker Carlson? It's an impossible task, possibly even tougher than defending Brexit, which you spruiked here for years.

This can only be done by spreading lies, telling fibs, evading, obscuring and living in a surreal echo chamber of fake news - news that even Tucker says is made up in order to get ratings, as is his self-professed right in a free society.

Yes, Tucker admits it. He tells lies, and he thinks you shouldn't believe him. His entire agenda is just a bit of fun, a fake news business model; infotainment. So who would possibly try to defend him as sincere?

Very few, old boy:

You.



Show us where Tucker 'admits' that everything he says is all lies.

Go on.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 98425
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #88 - Oct 2nd, 2022 at 11:19am
 
Frank wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 11:11am:
Karnal wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 3:43pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 8:30am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:13pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm:
Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond?

FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago.

Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first.....


Nigel Farrage had a point too.

Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles.

Cunning, no?


Bollox.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-your-right-to-work-in-the-uk-eu-eea-and-swiss-citizens


The UK introduced an Australian style points system. Those Poles and EU citizens who were already in the UK in 2020 are not affected.


Oh, I see. So after 2020, those Poles have as much right to work as any old garden-variety Paki, eh?

Yes, I see what you mean, dear boy. Mother is minding her manners. She's being equal and inclusive and liber...

Superior Culture, innit. To date, Brexit is estimated to have cost Mother 4% of her GDP, £32 bil a year in government revenue and at least £450 a year for each of her children.

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/brexit-will-cost-uk-workers-470-pounds-year-stu...

Forget all the additional red tape, border queues, food shortages, extra taxes and tariffs, job lay-offs and business closures. The UK is now in the grip of what is predicted to be a long term recession, with no way out, all because of policies you espouse.

But I'm curious. Who would try to defend the integrity of Tucker Carlson? It's an impossible task, possibly even tougher than defending Brexit, which you spruiked here for years.

This can only be done by spreading lies, telling fibs, evading, obscuring and living in a surreal echo chamber of fake news - news that even Tucker says is made up in order to get ratings, as is his self-professed right in a free society.

Yes, Tucker admits it. He tells lies, and he thinks you shouldn't believe him. His entire agenda is just a bit of fun, a fake news business model; infotainment. So who would possibly try to defend him as sincere?

Very few, old boy:

You.



Show us where Tucker 'admits' that everything he says is all lies.

Go on.


Everything, eh?

Cunning. If Tucker said that, dear boy, he would not be a liar. Tucker just lies enough. Just right, as Snow White would say.

Quote:
“I lie. If I’m really cornered or something, I lie. I really try not to. I try never to lie on TV. I just don’t, you know, I don’t like lying. I certainly do it, you know, out of weakness or whatever,” Carlson said.


This one says it all.

Quote:
Carlson has no conscience. It has been seared with a hot iron. Unfortunately, his viewers seem incapable or unwilling to face the facts. They cannot be reasoned with. Carlson remains popular while he continues to lie, dividing the nation with a false narrative.


You.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 2nd, 2022 at 11:34am by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51449
Gender: male
Re: Pauline Hanson
Reply #89 - Oct 2nd, 2022 at 12:48pm
 
Karnal wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 11:19am:
Frank wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 11:11am:
Karnal wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 3:43pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 8:30am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:13pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm:
Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond?

FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago.

Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first.....


Nigel Farrage had a point too.

Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles.

Cunning, no?


Bollox.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-your-right-to-work-in-the-uk-eu-eea-and-swiss-citizens


The UK introduced an Australian style points system. Those Poles and EU citizens who were already in the UK in 2020 are not affected.


Oh, I see. So after 2020, those Poles have as much right to work as any old garden-variety Paki, eh?

Yes, I see what you mean, dear boy. Mother is minding her manners. She's being equal and inclusive and liber...

Superior Culture, innit. To date, Brexit is estimated to have cost Mother 4% of her GDP, £32 bil a year in government revenue and at least £450 a year for each of her children.

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/brexit-will-cost-uk-workers-470-pounds-year-stu...

Forget all the additional red tape, border queues, food shortages, extra taxes and tariffs, job lay-offs and business closures. The UK is now in the grip of what is predicted to be a long term recession, with no way out, all because of policies you espouse.

But I'm curious. Who would try to defend the integrity of Tucker Carlson? It's an impossible task, possibly even tougher than defending Brexit, which you spruiked here for years.

This can only be done by spreading lies, telling fibs, evading, obscuring and living in a surreal echo chamber of fake news - news that even Tucker says is made up in order to get ratings, as is his self-professed right in a free society.

Yes, Tucker admits it. He tells lies, and he thinks you shouldn't believe him. His entire agenda is just a bit of fun, a fake news business model; infotainment. So who would possibly try to defend him as sincere?

Very few, old boy:

You.



Show us where Tucker 'admits' that everything he says is all lies.

Go on.


Everything, eh?

Cunning. If Tucker said that, dear boy, he would not be a liar. Tucker just lies enough. Just right, as Snow White would say.

Quote:
“I lie. If I’m really cornered or something, I lie. I really try not to. I try never to lie on TV. I just don’t, you know, I don’t like lying. I certainly do it, you know, out of weakness or whatever,” Carlson said.


This one says it all.

Quote:
Carlson has no conscience. It has been seared with a hot iron. Unfortunately, his viewers seem incapable or unwilling to face the facts. They cannot be reasoned with. Carlson remains popular while he continues to lie, dividing the nation with a false narrative.


You.



The first quote is about white lies. As he says he doesnt knowingly lie on his shows. But this admission of white lies - which is something every one of us can admit to - is turned into 'Tucker Carkson is a liar so don't listen to ANYTHING he says' in the most predictable gweggy turdy, grimacing paki kind of Bbwianesque way. It is just your ways, as has been pointed out many times, to excuse yourself from countering his arguments with intelligent, better arguments. No, calling him a liar saved you from refuting him.


The second quote of yours - from Richard Elfers, the sage of Enumclaw, WA  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy - is just a vivid proof - repeating exaggerated, overblown BS so as not to counter any of Carlson's arguments, views, explanations for his views. And of course damning everyone who doesn't fall in with the 'no conscience' crap. I am actually surprised a little about how many people are prepared to be taken in by such cheap, manipulative cloth-eard bluster like 'seared with a hot iron'. 

Richard Elfres's media empire hq: 1186 Myrtle Ave. Enumclaw, WA 98022.  Look it up on Google maps.



Since none of you ever listen to anything but snippets extracted for hatchet jobs purposes, here is the man in his own words, not talking to someone who just wants to catch him out and twist his words.






I am very happy to hear him out, unlike you lot.


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10
Send Topic Print