Good on Pauline for telling Senator Mehreen Faruqi to "piss off back to Pakistan". We need more politicians with the guts to take these ungrateful immigrants to task. Another leftie that doesn't understand the meaning of the word" racism".
If she wants to go on about human rights and racism she only has to look at her place of birth and the persecution of Christians by the Mussies.

OH Pauline is still alive breathing methane and making racial insults.

Some things never change.

Yeah, another leftie that fails to understand the meaning of the word racism. Sad but typical.

( big breath) OK
so
tell us what you are trying to say.

Take another deep breath.

Why on earth does the senator need another breath?

Ron wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 11:06am:

Good on Pauline for telling Senator Mehreen Faruqi to "piss off back to Pakistan". We need more politicians with the guts to take these ungrateful immigrants to task. Another leftie that doesn't understand the meaning of the word" racism". If she wants to go on about human rights and racism she only has to look at her place of birth and the persecution of Christians by the Mussies.

Thank you for this well considered, thoughtful comment Ron, in
support of the execrable Pauline Hanson whom you seem to see
as a vision of reason and rationale.

The twice divorced Hanson was a high school dropout, after getting
pregnant at age 15—which marked the end of any further education.
As a result, she has a very limited intellectual mindset, and a poor
grasp of politics, race relations, civil law, sexual and gender issues etc.

Recall, her main claim to fame(?) was running a fish and chip shop,
after working as a clerical assistant and barmaid.  Obviously then
she's not the sharpest tool in the toolbox LOL.

On the other hand we have Mehreen Faruqi... who holds a Bachelor
of Engineering, a Master of Engineering Science, and a Doctorate in
Environmental Engineering.

So I think we can see who's better educated and therefore far better
qualified in order to work in parliament.

https://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-my-view-on-issues-is-based-on-common-sense-and-my-experience-as-a-mother-of-four-children-pauline-hanson-12-36-50.jpg

Hanson's crude, racist insults directed at Faruqi further demonstrated
her lack of formal education and her inability to move on from the 1950s
days of black and white TV, 'reds under the beds' and 'the yellow peril'.

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 1:16pm:

On the other hand we have Mehreen Faruqi... who holds a Bachelor of Engineering, a Master of Engineering Science, and a Doctorate in Environmental Engineering. So I think we can see who's better educated and therefore far better qualified in order to work in parliament.

:D :D :D :D :D

You have a credential-fetish, pal, like illiterates have for books, no matter what's in them.  There are no 'education qualifications' to be in parliament. Ben Chiefly was a train driver.

But perhaps Faruqi's PhD thesis in particular qualifies her for being a Greens senator, spouting toxic nonsense:

Intensification of anaerobic lagoons for abattoir wastewater treatment and biogas recovery

The art and science of emitting stinking hot gas.

Pauline is savvy . Battered sav.

Frank wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 2:19pm:

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 1:16pm: On the other hand we have Mehreen Faruqi... who holds a Bachelor of Engineering, a Master of Engineering Science, and a Doctorate in Environmental Engineering. So I think we can see who's better educated and therefore far better qualified in order to work in parliament. You have a credential-fetish, pal, like illiterates have for books, no matter what's in them.  There are no 'education qualifications' to be in parliament. Ben Chiefly was a train driver.

So... a little hypothetical Frank.

You have two local candidates running for a political seat.  One runs
a fish and chip shop, and the other is a triple-certificated university
graduate. 

The former is transphobic, racist, xenophobic, Islamophobic,
anti-multicultural and anti-Asian, and a global warming denier.

The latter is none of those things, except of course being a Muslim.

So Frank, which one would you choose, and more importantly why?

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 3:20pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 2:19pm: AusGeoff wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 1:16pm: On the other hand we have Mehreen Faruqi... who holds a Bachelor of Engineering, a Master of Engineering Science, and a Doctorate in Environmental Engineering. So I think we can see who's better educated and therefore far better qualified in order to work in parliament. You have a credential-fetish, pal, like illiterates have for books, no matter what's in them.  There are no 'education qualifications' to be in parliament. Ben Chiefly was a train driver. So... a little hypothetical Frank. You have two local candidates running for a political seat.  One runs a fish and chip shop, and the other is a triple-certificated university graduate.  The former is transphobic, racist, xenophobic, Islamophobic, anti-multicultural and anti-Asian, and a global warming denier. The latter is none of those things, except of course being a Muslim. So Frank, which one would you choose, and more importantly why?

:D :D :D

This must be your idea of a trick question Geoffrey.  Very transparent.

None of your characterisations of Hanson or One Nation are true.

transphobic = it is an idiotic formulation. Lazy attempt at blackmail.
racist - another stupid lazy label thrown around to avoid thinking
xenophobic - and another
Islamophobic - and another
anti-multicultural - the only sensible stance regarding multiculturalism is to oppose it. It is a lot of nonsense.
anti-Asian - crap. not wanting huge numbers very rapidly is a sensible immigration policy.
global warming denier - a mindless, empty formulation signalling idiocy and laziness in the mental department - like the other lazy little slogans you let off.

I am surprised you left out from your recitation the slogans du jour - fascist and far right/ultra right/extreme right. This sort of stupid labelling is calculated to rule opposing ideas out of court out of hand,  in order NOT to need to defend you own stance. Too transparent, a favourite tactic of people who have learned the shibboleths but (or rather because) they cannot think. 

"Emma Eros is a mother-of-two, a businesswoman and a Muslim activist and, as of Monday, One Nation’s newest candidate for the upcoming NSW election. Here, she explains her decision to join the controversial political party. So why One Nation? Because I believe the One Nation party of today is inclusive and equal.

I fully support One Nation; I hold the same ideals and aspirations as One Nation, even when it comes to slowing down immigration, despite the fact that my family emigrated here from Lebanon in the 1960s. I believe charity begins at home when it comes to immigration and we have to look after our own people first. Australia is very welcoming but must be wise to immigrants from countries who will not integrate or respect our way of life."

OR

A woman believed to be One Nation's first Asian candidate is not offended by Pauline Hanson's infamous remark 20 years ago that the country was at risk of "being swamped by Asians".

Shan Ju Lin said she believed she and the party would get the votes of "good Asians" in the Queensland election, slated for 2018, as they too feared the rising influence of the Chinese Government in Australia.

She understood why Ms Hanson made those comments, which included claims that Asians "form ghettos and do not assimilate. For European people it's very difficult to distinguish Chinese or Korean or Japanese, and I can understand why she said it," Ms Lin said. "She sees the problem ahead of everybody, including you and me."

OR

The Indian candidates all know each other. Nik Aii Reddy, a Pauline Hanson’s One Nation candidate, is standing in the seat of Bancroft in Brisbane’s north and is a former deputy to Mr Thevar at the FICQ.  Born in the southern Indian city of Hyderabad, he says race is not a barrier and denies the party he has twice been a candidate for is racist.

"Not, like, racism, but people do have views, that happens everywhere, I guess," he said.“I believe this the only party that speaks up for all Australians, it doesn’t matter where you come from."

PS

What's with the "AUS" in AusGeoff?  Signalling what?

What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World?

Asking for a friend....

---

Ron wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 11:06am:

If she wants to go on about human rights and racism she only has to look at her place of birth and the persecution of Christians by the Mussies.

If the Muslims are in Pakistan, they are not "Mussies". "Mussies/Muzzies" refer to "Aussie Muslims".

UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 4:01pm:

Ron wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 11:06am: If she wants to go on about human rights and racism she only has to look at her place of birth and the persecution of Christians by the Mussies. If the Muslims are in Pakistan, they are not "Mussies". "Mussies/Muzzies" refer to "Aussie Muslims".

Yeah!  the rest of 'em go by the term 'Mussos'!!

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 3:59pm:

What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend....

Tucker is a fascist worm, nobody should agree with him. He even supported the insurrection and the stolen election lies. Yes Tucker hates America that much that he was on board for overturning their democracy.

He is an opportunist who does not even believe what he is saying himself.

His network dismiss him in court as an opinion writer who's opinions are not to be believed.

In short Tuckers employer knows that he lies to his audience and like it that way.

There is no worse or more unreliable source for information in world broadcasting.

Ron wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 11:16am:

Yeah, another leftie that fails to understand the meaning of the word racism. Sad but typical.

Quote:

telling Senator Mehreen Faruqi to "piss off back to Pakistan"

You are the one who posted the racist comment - don't blame me for that.

By the way - you cannot be a senator if you are not an Australian.

She should have told Hanson to go back to Bogansville.

Ah Geoffrey, poor Geoffrey, for such a sensitive, virtue signalling, woke leftie your hypocrisy is astounding. You are also extremely judgemental.
So what if a person is twice divorced and pregnant at 15? As far as intellect goes she would play you on a break mate. You still struggle with the meaning of simple words like racism and normal, so intelligence is definitely is not your forte.
Pauline would have more guts and intelligence in her little finger than you have in your entire body.
And by the way Geoffrey long rambling, meaningless posts don't signify a high intellect.

Ron wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 4:29pm:

Ah Geoffrey, poor Geoffrey, for such a sensitive, virtue signalling, woke leftie your hypocrisy is astounding. You are also extremely judgemental. So what if a person is twice divorced and pregnant at 15? As far as intellect goes she would play you on a break mate. You still struggle with the meaning of simple words like racism and normal, so intelligence is definitely is not your forte. Pauline would have more guts and intelligence in her little finger than you have in your entire body. And by the way Geoffrey long rambling, meaningless posts don't signify a high intellect.

Quote:

she would play you on off a break mate

Where did you come from or what is your first language ?

Mussies are mussies no matter where they are.

Ron wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 11:06am:

doesn't understand the meaning of the word" racism". .

Oh you mean 'hypocrisy' not 'racism'.

Dnarever wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 4:20pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm: What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend.... Tucker is a fascist worm, nobody should agree with him. He even supported the insurrection and the stolen election lies. Yes Tucker hates America that much that he was on board for overturning their democracy. He is an opportunist who does not even believe what he is saying himself. His network dismiss him in court as an opinion writer who's opinions are not to be believed. In short Tuckers employer knows that he lies to his audience and like it that way. There is no worse or more unreliable source for information in world broadcasting.

You can't refute him - so you call him a fascist.  you are tired, obvious, unhinged, inarticulate, stupid, ducky. 


Try presenting a better idea, not just parrot that 'these ideas are beneath debating'.

Dnarever wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 4:32pm:

Ron wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:29pm: Ah Geoffrey, poor Geoffrey, for such a sensitive, virtue signalling, woke leftie your hypocrisy is astounding. You are also extremely judgemental. So what if a person is twice divorced and pregnant at 15? As far as intellect goes she would play you on a break mate. You still struggle with the meaning of simple words like racism and normal, so intelligence is definitely is not your forte. Pauline would have more guts and intelligence in her little finger than you have in your entire body. And by the way Geoffrey long rambling, meaningless posts don't signify a high intellect. Quote: she would play you on off a break mate Where did you come from or what is your first language ?

Ooohhh... Aussie nationalism poking it head through there, duckwit... Tsk, tsk  ::) ::)

AusGeoff and all that, eh? Grew here, flew here.

Ron wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 4:29pm:

Pauline would have more guts and intelligence in her little finger than you have in your entire body.

Oh, she's a regular Einstein.

"Person, woman, man, camera, minimum chips, TV"

A finger can't have intelligence.

Pauline needs to step up more often on issues like this, she is getting good money to do the job she was elected for and there is no one else up for the job, they don't want to be called wacists or anything, they are there for the lucrative power trip short haul, Pauline has been there 30yrs and weathered the wacist fish and chip shop common scum low life jokes and wrongfull imprisoment but now needs to do more for the sake of OZ.

---

Senate 76 seats.
One Nation 2 seats.

chimera wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 7:35pm:

Senate 76 seats. One Nation 2 seats.

She gets about .01% of the say and its always decared wacist etc

Poor girl it's not her fault, it's just her mouth. Shame.

chimera wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 7:47pm:

Poor girl it's not her fault, it's just her mouth. Shame.

Its what comes out of her mouth that's important, but i agree she does sound a bit crass sometimes, at least she makes sense most of the time unlike you.

It's 2/76 important. About 2.6% Senate. 2 out of 227 seats in the whole Parliament. Maybe the pilot is important in a large plane but she's not. A pilot.

Frank wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 6:39pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:32pm: Ron wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:29pm: Ah Geoffrey, poor Geoffrey, for such a sensitive, virtue signalling, woke leftie your hypocrisy is astounding. You are also extremely judgemental. So what if a person is twice divorced and pregnant at 15? As far as intellect goes she would play you on a break mate. You still struggle with the meaning of simple words like racism and normal, so intelligence is definitely is not your forte. Pauline would have more guts and intelligence in her little finger than you have in your entire body. And by the way Geoffrey long rambling, meaningless posts don't signify a high intellect. Quote: she would play you on off a break mate Where did you come from or what is your first language ? Ooohhh... Aussie nationalism poking it head through there, duckwit... Tsk, tsk  ::) ::) AusGeoff and all that, eh? Grew here, flew here.

'Allo? 'Allo?  Paging Mista AUS Geoffrey. Are you there, Masta AUS Geoffrey?


Or hiding behind your qualifications? We can see you, AUS  Geoff. Come out, come out!

Johnnie wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 7:40pm:

chimera wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 7:35pm: Senate 76 seats. One Nation 2 seats. She gets about .01% of the say and its always decared wacist etc

I can see why you think she''s smart  :D

She's a great Australian, unlike the leftie anti Australian rabble here.

Ron wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 9:44pm:

She's a great Australian, unlike the leftie anti Australian rabble here.

she's a frknnn drongo, .... is she your mother?

Johnnie, unfortunately I think you are braindead man. Grow a set mate or go back to where you came from, you can't possibly be an Aussie.

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 3:20pm:

So... a little hypothetical You have two local candidates running for a political seat.  One runs a fish and chip shop, and the other is a triple-certificated university graduate.  The former is transphobic, racist, xenophobic, Islamophobic, anti-multicultural and anti-Asian, and a global warming denier. The latter is none of those things, except of course being a Muslim. So  which one would you choose, and more importantly why?

Is the university graduate a muslim who believes Muhammad rode a flying donkey called Buraq?

Is the belief Muhammad rode a flying donkey a sign of intelligence or ignorance?

Can we criticise her belief that Muhammad rode a flying donkey or is that considered islamophobia?

Is the exact opposite of a Xenophobe someone who promiscuosly embraces foreign culture while rejecting their own home grown culture? is being the exact opposite of a Xenophobe something to be proud of?

In Islamic countries it's rare for muslim women to go to university to study something other than islamic studies, sounds like this Green senator has led a sheltered life.

Pauline has candidates from all races in One Nation does that sound like someone who is a racist?

For me i would vote for politicians with real life experience.

---

Geoffrey has a great talent for writing unintelligent bullshit.

Well said Baron but don't expect our Geoffrey to be able to comprehend it.

Frank wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 6:38pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:20pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm: What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend.... Tucker is a fascist worm, nobody should agree with him. He even supported the insurrection and the stolen election lies. Yes Tucker hates America that much that he was on board for overturning their democracy. He is an opportunist who does not even believe what he is saying himself. His network dismiss him in court as an opinion writer who's opinions are not to be believed. In short Tuckers employer knows that he lies to his audience and like it that way. There is no worse or more unreliable source for information in world broadcasting. You can't refute him - so you call him a fascist.  you are tired, obvious, unhinged, inarticulate, stupid, ducky.  Try presenting a better idea, not just parrot that 'these ideas are beneath debating'.

Quote:

You can't refute him

His own employer refutes him.

There is nothing easier to do than to refute Tucker - not much he has to say is true.

Johnnie wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 7:29pm:

Pauline needs to step up more often on issues like this, she is getting good money to do the job she was elected for and there is no one else up for the job, they don't want to be called wacists or anything, they are there for the lucrative power trip short haul, Pauline has been there 30yrs and weathered the wacist fish and chip shop common scum low life jokes and wrongfull imprisoment but now needs to do more for the sake of OZ.

Pauline's most attractive look ever.

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 1:16pm:

On the other hand we have Mehreen Faruqi... who holds a Bachelor of Engineering, a Master of Engineering Science, and a Doctorate in Environmental Engineering.

Osama Bin Laden was an engineer in fact quite a few islamic terrorists were engineers.

Perhaps you should click on this google link

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=engineering+and+terrorism&source=hp&ei=DD80Y6uSG4zB4-EP_JeTqAE&iflsig=AJiK0e8AAAAAYzRNHBpcbKKVZ3NF5hCtqX0M-JzhTZV1&oq=engineering+and+terr&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAEYADIGCAAQHhAWMgYIABAeEBYyBggAEB4QFjIGCAAQHhAWMggIABAeEA8QFjIICAAQHhAPEBYyBggAEB4QFjIGCAAQHhAWMgYIABAeEBY6EQguEIAEELEDEIMBEMcBENEDOgQIABADOggILhCxAxCDAToLCC4QgAQQsQMQgwE6DgguELEDEIMBEMcBENEDOgsIABCABBCxAxCDAToRCC4QgAQQsQMQgwEQxwEQrwE6BQgAEIAEOggIABCxAxCDAToLCC4QsQMQgwEQ1AI6CAgAEIAEELEDOgsIABCABBCxAxDJAzoFCAAQkgM6DggAEIAEELEDEIMBEMkDOgsILhCABBDHARCvAToICAAQgAQQyQM6BQguEIAEUABYo0Jg2V1oAHAAeACAAfsBiAHgHZIBBjAuMTUuNZgBAKABAQ&sclient=gws-wiz

Frank wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 6:39pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:32pm: Ron wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:29pm: Ah Geoffrey, poor Geoffrey, for such a sensitive, virtue signalling, woke leftie your hypocrisy is astounding. You are also extremely judgemental. So what if a person is twice divorced and pregnant at 15? As far as intellect goes she would play you on a break mate. You still struggle with the meaning of simple words like racism and normal, so intelligence is definitely is not your forte. Pauline would have more guts and intelligence in her little finger than you have in your entire body. And by the way Geoffrey long rambling, meaningless posts don't signify a high intellect. Quote: she would play you on off a break mate Where did you come from or what is your first language ? Ooohhh... Aussie nationalism poking it head through there, duckwit... Tsk, tsk  ::) ::) AusGeoff and all that, eh? Grew here, flew here.

I don't care just curious.

Funny that the guy spewing racist garbage was misusing a common English saying with co comprehension of his own statement, typical of someone using a second language.

Dear Dnarever, please consult your dictionary  and educate yourself on the meaning of racism. Don't feel too bad though as leftards in general think it means criticism.

The Paki sheila apparently is ignorant of the fact that she's being hypocritical. She rubbishes the Monarchy, which in turn is essentially rubbishing Australia ... and yet she lives here and is in Parliament. If she, as a Paki immigrant, thinks that the Monarchy is racist, then how come she was allowed to live in Australia? The monarchy has allowed immigrants of different ethnicities to settle in Australia since the second fleet, so in order to not be hypocritical, she ought to keep her big idiot mouth shut, or move elsewhere until we break free of the Monarchy, if that ever happens

Her timing to make such a comment at a sensitive moment of the Queen's passing was just plain stupid, and even more stupid to mouth it off in Parliament of all places. Even hardened republicans would have been taken aback by what she said so soon after the Queen's death


A hypocritical Paki Greenie lefty ...

https://youtu.be/4gXZqmlmQ_A

Ron wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 11:06am:

that doesn't understand the meaning of the word" racism". .

'a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth of colonised peoples'.

In the words of her sentence, how has she misused the meaning of the word 'racist'?

Ron wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 4:45pm:

Mussies are mussies no matter where they are.

Mussies are Muslim Australians... no matter where they move (up until they ditch their Australian citizenship).

For a start they had no wealth and no lives were stolen, so it's more of her bullshit.
She has no idea and should piss off if she's not happy here, she certainly doesn't add anything good to this country.

chimera wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 6:40am:

Ron wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 11:06am: that doesn't understand the meaning of the word" racism". . 'a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth of colonised peoples'. In the words of her sentence, how has she misused the meaning of the word 'racist'?

The Paki's ill thought out sentence doesn't apply to Queen Elizabeth 11

Dnarever wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 4:20pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm: What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend.... Tucker is a fascist worm

;D :D

How do you know, ducky? Do you listen to him? When was the last time you did?  Or are you just regurgitating what someone regurgitated for you?

Ron wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 10:23am:

For a start they had no wealth and no lives were stolen, so it's more of her bullshit. .

So British battleships built with imperial profits couldn't be paid for.
Slave ships had no slaves in them. Britain dumped thousands of poms in India knowing there was no money there. They couldn't grow any cotton in Dixie or coffee anywhere as it was all desert. No diamonds in the Crown.

chimera wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 4:01pm:

Ron wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:23am: For a start they had no wealth and no lives were stolen, so it's more of her bullshit. . So British battleships built with imperial profits couldn't be paid for. Slave ships had no slaves in them. Britain dumped thousands of poms in India knowing there was no money there. They couldn't grow any cotton in Dixie or coffee anywhere as it was all desert. No diamonds in the Crown.

You are one deluded and confused individual.

Yes I agree. Can you answer any of those comments about 'no wealth'?

Frank wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 3:51pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:20pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm: What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend.... Tucker is a fascist worm ;D :D How do you know, ducky? Do you listen to him? When was the last time you did?  Or are you just regurgitating what someone regurgitated for you?

Remember when Tuckers lead writer was a white nationalist, they sacked him after about 10 years of ranting on his view without noticing and Tuckers content didn't change. He is still on things like his replacement theory etc.

The story is that Tucker was always fully aware of that guys beliefs and liked them.

Ron wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 1:43am:

Dear Dnarever, please consult your dictionary  and educate yourself on the meaning of racism. Don't feel too bad though as leftards in general think it means criticism.

Quote:

"Go back to where you came from" is a racist or xenophobic epithet which is used in many different countries, and it is mainly used to target immigrants and/or ethnic groups whose members are falsely considered to be immigrants

You seen to have the typical right wing skill of consistently being wrong.

Yes you get played on a break by all.

Maybe the lunch break?

Dwhatever you're still showing your ignorance of the meaning of the word.

"Go back to where you came from" a racist term?  You idiot.

Gotta love you deluded leftards. You choose to remain ignorant and are incapable of learning.

Ron wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 8:11pm:

Dwhatever you're still showing your ignorance of the meaning of the word.

only if you have your head stuck up your arse

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/h_600,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb1b4c70b-6176-4a42-9455-a61a7b0ba5d8_600x314.jpeg

No wealth in India, Ron?

chimera wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 8:24pm:

No wealth in India, Ron?

the poms stole it all  :D :D :D :D :D

You Pack of leftard fools. The abo's had no wealth and their lives weren't stolen.
Please  at least try and get something right.

Was India in the Empire, Ron?

Dnarever wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 5:35pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 3:51pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:20pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm: What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend.... Tucker is a fascist worm ;D :D How do you know, ducky? Do you listen to him? When was the last time you did?  Or are you just regurgitating what someone regurgitated for you? Remember when Tuckers lead writer was a white nationalist, they sacked him after about 10 years of ranting on his view without noticing and Tuckers content didn't change. He is still on things like his replacement theory etc. The story is that Tucker was always fully aware of that guys beliefs and liked them.

So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says.

Your view of him is entirely second hand. As of everything else. I don't think you have had an idea of your own for decades. And that's just how you like it, an millions like you.

Frank wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 10:04pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 5:35pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 3:51pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:20pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm: What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend.... Tucker is a fascist worm ;D :D How do you know, ducky? Do you listen to him? When was the last time you did?  Or are you just regurgitating what someone regurgitated for you? Remember when Tuckers lead writer was a white nationalist, they sacked him after about 10 years of ranting on his view without noticing and Tuckers content didn't change. He is still on things like his replacement theory etc. The story is that Tucker was always fully aware of that guys beliefs and liked them. So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. Your view of him is entirely second hand. As of everything else. I don't think you have had an idea of your own for decades. And that's just how you like it, an millions like you.

Quote:

So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says.

No never said that.

Nobody could possibly listen to a lot of his whiney pathetic voice and the garbage he spews out. However I never said that I have never listened to anything in his broadcast. I have been exposed to way too much of his garbage over the years.

There is no way that you could listen to him and then think that he was right about anything.

Dnarever wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 10:10pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 5:35pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 3:51pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:20pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm: What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend.... Tucker is a fascist worm ;D :D How do you know, ducky? Do you listen to him? When was the last time you did?  Or are you just regurgitating what someone regurgitated for you? Remember when Tuckers lead writer was a white nationalist, they sacked him after about 10 years of ranting on his view without noticing and Tuckers content didn't change. He is still on things like his replacement theory etc. The story is that Tucker was always fully aware of that guys beliefs and liked them. So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. Your view of him is entirely second hand. As of everything else. I don't think you have had an idea of your own for decades. And that's just how you like it, an millions like you. Quote: So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. No never said that. Nobody could possibly listen to a lot of his whiney pathetic voice and the garbage he spews out. However I never said that I have never listened to anything in his broadcast. I have been exposed to way too much of his garbage over the years. There is no way that you could listen to him and then think that he was right about anything.

How do you know it's garbage if you never hear him out, dicky ducky?  You let your thinking done for you by others- so prog, so herd.

Lazy, stupid.


One of the fundamental requirements of disagreement is that you UNDERSTAND what the person you disagree with is saying. But never actually listening to what he says, you cannot possibly disagree with him.

You are just a mindless drone, repeating second hand bollocks that excuses you from listening, thinking, articulating.  And that's just on Carlson. You are utterly ignorant of everything else you 'disagree' with - you never heard or read what you 'disagree' with. You are a herd drongo.  And there are so many of you.

chimera wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 9:23pm:

Was India in the Empire, Ron?

Wake up to yourself and try and make sense.

Frank wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 10:13pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:10pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 5:35pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 3:51pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:20pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm: What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend.... Tucker is a fascist worm ;D :D How do you know, ducky? Do you listen to him? When was the last time you did?  Or are you just regurgitating what someone regurgitated for you? Remember when Tuckers lead writer was a white nationalist, they sacked him after about 10 years of ranting on his view without noticing and Tuckers content didn't change. He is still on things like his replacement theory etc. The story is that Tucker was always fully aware of that guys beliefs and liked them. So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. Your view of him is entirely second hand. As of everything else. I don't think you have had an idea of your own for decades. And that's just how you like it, an millions like you. Quote: So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. No never said that. Nobody could possibly listen to a lot of his whiney pathetic voice and the garbage he spews out. However I never said that I have never listened to anything in his broadcast. I have been exposed to way too much of his garbage over the years. There is no way that you could listen to him and then think that he was right about anything. How do you know it's garbage if you never hear him out, dicky ducky?  You let your thinking done for you by others- so prog, so herd. Lazy, stupid. One of the fundamental requirements of disagreement is that you UNDERSTAND what the person you disagree with is saying. But never actually listening to what he says, you cannot possibly disagree with him. You are just a mindless drone, repeating second hand bollocks that excuses you from listening, thinking, articulating.  And that's just on Carlson. You are utterly ignorant of everything else you 'disagree' with - you never heard or read what you 'disagree' with. You are a herd drongo.  And there are so many of you.

His own network label him a liar and they are right.

John Smith wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 8:25pm:

chimera wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 8:24pm: No wealth in India, Ron? the poms stole it all  :D :D :D :D :D

... not that they were doing much of a job with it .............

Ron wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 11:06am:

Senator Mehreen Faruqi to "piss off back to Pakistan". If she wants to go on about human rights and racism she only has to look at her place of birth .

Ron,
You raised Pakistan, and 'she goes on'. She was talking about the empire. The empire included both India-Pakistan and Australia. Your topic is about the wealth of all those places.
Does shooting an Aboriginal steal his life?

Dnarever wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 11:55pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:13pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:10pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 5:35pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 3:51pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:20pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm: What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend.... Tucker is a fascist worm ;D :D How do you know, ducky? Do you listen to him? When was the last time you did?  Or are you just regurgitating what someone regurgitated for you? Remember when Tuckers lead writer was a white nationalist, they sacked him after about 10 years of ranting on his view without noticing and Tuckers content didn't change. He is still on things like his replacement theory etc. The story is that Tucker was always fully aware of that guys beliefs and liked them. So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. Your view of him is entirely second hand. As of everything else. I don't think you have had an idea of your own for decades. And that's just how you like it, an millions like you. Quote: So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. No never said that. Nobody could possibly listen to a lot of his whiney pathetic voice and the garbage he spews out. However I never said that I have never listened to anything in his broadcast. I have been exposed to way too much of his garbage over the years. There is no way that you could listen to him and then think that he was right about anything. How do you know it's garbage if you never hear him out, dicky ducky?  You let your thinking done for you by others- so prog, so herd. Lazy, stupid. One of the fundamental requirements of disagreement is that you UNDERSTAND what the person you disagree with is saying. But never actually listening to what he says, you cannot possibly disagree with him. You are just a mindless drone, repeating second hand bollocks that excuses you from listening, thinking, articulating.  And that's just on Carlson. You are utterly ignorant of everything else you 'disagree' with - you never heard or read what you 'disagree' with. You are a herd drongo.  And there are so many of you. His own network label him a liar and they are right.

I've had the misfortune of seeing loads of Tucker Carlson. He's a conspiracy theorist, a hate-monger, an outright liar and, i suspect, profoundly unwell.

Anyone who supports this dead-set lunatic is worthy of all respect of an Infowars fan.

And no better can be said of Hanson, a veritable noxious weed in modern politics.

P
Dnarever wrote on Sep 29^th, 2022 at 11:55pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:13pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:10pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 5:35pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 3:51pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:20pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm: What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend.... Tucker is a fascist worm ;D :D How do you know, ducky? Do you listen to him? When was the last time you did?  Or are you just regurgitating what someone regurgitated for you? Remember when Tuckers lead writer was a white nationalist, they sacked him after about 10 years of ranting on his view without noticing and Tuckers content didn't change. He is still on things like his replacement theory etc. The story is that Tucker was always fully aware of that guys beliefs and liked them. So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. Your view of him is entirely second hand. As of everything else. I don't think you have had an idea of your own for decades. And that's just how you like it, an millions like you. Quote: So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. No never said that. Nobody could possibly listen to a lot of his whiney pathetic voice and the garbage he spews out. However I never said that I have never listened to anything in his broadcast. I have been exposed to way too much of his garbage over the years. There is no way that you could listen to him and then think that he was right about anything. How do you know it's garbage if you never hear him out, dicky ducky?  You let your thinking done for you by others- so prog, so herd. Lazy, stupid. One of the fundamental requirements of disagreement is that you UNDERSTAND what the person you disagree with is saying. But never actually listening to what he says, you cannot possibly disagree with him. You are just a mindless drone, repeating second hand bollocks that excuses you from listening, thinking, articulating.  And that's just on Carlson. You are utterly ignorant of everything else you 'disagree' with - you never heard or read what you 'disagree' with. You are a herd drongo.  And there are so many of you. His own network label him a liar and they are right.

Nonsense, ducky.  You are just regurgigating nonsense from hit pieces from hir rival media sources. As does Mothra.

Just labelling him with the same old slogans -  hate monger, conspiracy theorist. These do not mean anything, you lot have been letting off such empty puffery for years, directed at anyone you cannot refute or counter with intelligent argument.


Likewise with Hanson. She is not a sophisticate and that is precisely her great value in parliament. She is the little boy who point out that the Emperor has no clothes. - not the apparatchik with a law degree lying doggo and barking or wagging his tale,  as required by the party. 

Ron wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 11:16am:

Yeah, another leftie that fails to understand the meaning of the word racism. Sad but typical.

Pakis are not a race, no?

Ron wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 10:02pm:

Johnnie, unfortunately I think you are braindead man. Grow a set mate or go back to where you came from, you can't possibly be an Aussie.

Matty? You are Johnnie. Don't forget your respective names, dear.

You never know when you'll need to log back in and reply to yourself.

Frank wrote on Sep 30^th, 2022 at 9:14am:

P Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 11:55pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:13pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:10pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 5:35pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 3:51pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:20pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm: What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend.... Tucker is a fascist worm ;D :D How do you know, ducky? Do you listen to him? When was the last time you did?  Or are you just regurgitating what someone regurgitated for you? Remember when Tuckers lead writer was a white nationalist, they sacked him after about 10 years of ranting on his view without noticing and Tuckers content didn't change. He is still on things like his replacement theory etc. The story is that Tucker was always fully aware of that guys beliefs and liked them. So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. Your view of him is entirely second hand. As of everything else. I don't think you have had an idea of your own for decades. And that's just how you like it, an millions like you. Quote: So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. No never said that. Nobody could possibly listen to a lot of his whiney pathetic voice and the garbage he spews out. However I never said that I have never listened to anything in his broadcast. I have been exposed to way too much of his garbage over the years. There is no way that you could listen to him and then think that he was right about anything. How do you know it's garbage if you never hear him out, dicky ducky?  You let your thinking done for you by others- so prog, so herd. Lazy, stupid. One of the fundamental requirements of disagreement is that you UNDERSTAND what the person you disagree with is saying. But never actually listening to what he says, you cannot possibly disagree with him. You are just a mindless drone, repeating second hand bollocks that excuses you from listening, thinking, articulating.  And that's just on Carlson. You are utterly ignorant of everything else you 'disagree' with - you never heard or read what you 'disagree' with. You are a herd drongo.  And there are so many of you. His own network label him a liar and they are right. Nonsense, ducky.  You are just regurgigating nonsense from hit pieces from hir rival media sources. As does Mothra. Just labelling him with the same old slogans -  hate monger, conspiracy theorist. These do not mean anything, you lot have been letting off such empty puffery for years, directed at anyone you cannot refute or counter with intelligent argument. Likewise with Hanson. She is not a sophisticate and that is precisely her great value in parliament. She is the little boy who point out that the Emperor has no clothes. - not the apparatchik with a law degree lying doggo and barking or wagging his tale,  as required by the party.

No it is what Fox said in court in the dominion case. They explained to the judge that Tuckers opinion pieces were something that everyone knows is untrue. There position was that everyone knows that Tuckers word is not to be trusted so nobody would have believed what he said against Dominion.

Dnarever wrote on Sep 30^th, 2022 at 6:48pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:14am: P Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 11:55pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:13pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:10pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 5:35pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 3:51pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:20pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm: What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend.... Tucker is a fascist worm ;D :D How do you know, ducky? Do you listen to him? When was the last time you did?  Or are you just regurgitating what someone regurgitated for you? Remember when Tuckers lead writer was a white nationalist, they sacked him after about 10 years of ranting on his view without noticing and Tuckers content didn't change. He is still on things like his replacement theory etc. The story is that Tucker was always fully aware of that guys beliefs and liked them. So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. Your view of him is entirely second hand. As of everything else. I don't think you have had an idea of your own for decades. And that's just how you like it, an millions like you. Quote: So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. No never said that. Nobody could possibly listen to a lot of his whiney pathetic voice and the garbage he spews out. However I never said that I have never listened to anything in his broadcast. I have been exposed to way too much of his garbage over the years. There is no way that you could listen to him and then think that he was right about anything. How do you know it's garbage if you never hear him out, dicky ducky?  You let your thinking done for you by others- so prog, so herd. Lazy, stupid. One of the fundamental requirements of disagreement is that you UNDERSTAND what the person you disagree with is saying. But never actually listening to what he says, you cannot possibly disagree with him. You are just a mindless drone, repeating second hand bollocks that excuses you from listening, thinking, articulating.  And that's just on Carlson. You are utterly ignorant of everything else you 'disagree' with - you never heard or read what you 'disagree' with. You are a herd drongo.  And there are so many of you. His own network label him a liar and they are right. Nonsense, ducky.  You are just regurgigating nonsense from hit pieces from hir rival media sources. As does Mothra. Just labelling him with the same old slogans -  hate monger, conspiracy theorist. These do not mean anything, you lot have been letting off such empty puffery for years, directed at anyone you cannot refute or counter with intelligent argument. Likewise with Hanson. She is not a sophisticate and that is precisely her great value in parliament. She is the little boy who point out that the Emperor has no clothes. - not the apparatchik with a law degree lying doggo and barking or wagging his tale,  as required by the party.  No it is what Fox said in court in the dominion case. They explained to the judge that Tuckers opinion pieces were something that everyone knows is untrue. There position was that everyone knows that Tuckers word is not to be trusted so nobody would have believed what he said against Dominion.

Lying, ducky, you are lying.

Why?

Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed.


Quote:

A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously.

Quote:

The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes."

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9

Frank wrote on Sep 30^th, 2022 at 6:59pm:

Ji Dnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 6:48pm: Frank wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:14am: P Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 11:55pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:13pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:10pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 10:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 5:35pm: Frank wrote on Sep 29th, 2022 at 3:51pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 4:20pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 3:59pm: What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend.... Tucker is a fascist worm ;D :D How do you know, ducky? Do you listen to him? When was the last time you did?  Or are you just regurgitating what someone regurgitated for you? Remember when Tuckers lead writer was a white nationalist, they sacked him after about 10 years of ranting on his view without noticing and Tuckers content didn't change. He is still on things like his replacement theory etc. The story is that Tucker was always fully aware of that guys beliefs and liked them. So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. Your view of him is entirely second hand. As of everything else. I don't think you have had an idea of your own for decades. And that's just how you like it, an millions like you. Quote: So you don't actually listen to him and know or hear what he says. No never said that. Nobody could possibly listen to a lot of his whiney pathetic voice and the garbage he spews out. However I never said that I have never listened to anything in his broadcast. I have been exposed to way too much of his garbage over the years. There is no way that you could listen to him and then think that he was right about anything. How do you know it's garbage if you never hear him out, dicky ducky?  You let your thinking done for you by others- so prog, so herd. Lazy, stupid. One of the fundamental requirements of disagreement is that you UNDERSTAND what the person you disagree with is saying. But never actually listening to what he says, you cannot possibly disagree with him. You are just a mindless drone, repeating second hand bollocks that excuses you from listening, thinking, articulating.  And that's just on Carlson. You are utterly ignorant of everything else you 'disagree' with - you never heard or read what you 'disagree' with. You are a herd drongo.  And there are so many of you. His own network label him a liar and they are right. Nonsense, ducky.  You are just regurgigating nonsense from hit pieces from hir rival media sources. As does Mothra. Just labelling him with the same old slogans -  hate monger, conspiracy theorist. These do not mean anything, you lot have been letting off such empty puffery for years, directed at anyone you cannot refute or counter with intelligent argument. Likewise with Hanson. She is not a sophisticate and that is precisely her great value in parliament. She is the little boy who point out that the Emperor has no clothes. - not the apparatchik with a law degree lying doggo and barking or wagging his tale,  as required by the party.  No it is what Fox said in court in the dominion case. They explained to the judge that Tuckers opinion pieces were something that everyone knows is untrue. There position was that everyone knows that Tuckers word is not to be trusted so nobody would have believed what he said against Dominion. Lyind, ducky, you are lying. Why?

Dear Frank - see post 74 as example. No it is correct, a judge even ruled that Tuckers words are of no value and threw the case out.

Dnarever wrote on Sep 30^th, 2022 at 7:07pm:

Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed. Quote: A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously. [quote]The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes."

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9[/quote]


Oppss ..... another fail for Sore end ;D ;D ;D

Dnarever wrote on Sep 30^th, 2022 at 7:07pm:

Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed. Quote: A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously. [quote]The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes."

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9[/quote]
Opinion.

Not 'lies'. opinion. 

But you, being completely unable to counter his argument, simply label it a 'lie' so you do not have to present your own opinion - which then could be subject to analysis and refutation.

We see through your cowardly rhetoric and agit-prop, ducky. Too transparent, too obvious, too thick and silly.

Frank wrote on Sep 30^th, 2022 at 7:54pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:07pm: Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed. Quote: A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously. [quote]The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes." https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9

Opinion.

Not 'lies'. opinion. 

But you, being completely unable to counter his argument, simply label it a 'lie' so you do not have to present your own opinion - which then could be subject to analysis and refutation.

We see through your cowardly rhetoric and agit-prop, ducky. Too transparent, too obvious, too thick and silly.



[/quote]

I'm guessing an ideal Saturday night for you is Tucker in your ass, Donald in your mouth, and Putin pissing over the three of you - yeah?

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30^th, 2022 at 7:57pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:54pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:07pm: Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed. Quote: A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously. [quote]The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes." https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9 Opinion. Not 'lies'. opinion.  But you, being completely unable to counter his argument, simply label it a 'lie' so you do not have to present your own opinion - which then could be subject to analysis and refutation. We see through your cowardly rhetoric and agit-prop, ducky. Too transparent, too obvious, too thick and silly.

I'm guessing an ideal Saturday night for you is Tucker in your ass, Donald in your mouth, and Putin pissing over the three of you - yeah?

[/quote]


There, wee bufty, your intellectual equal, your comrade in arms in the great struggle to clear the S bend  - a piece of Slovenian shite struggling to go past the S bend but never managing it. Float like a turd, stink like a gweggy.
Commune with him, he is your kind of POS.

https://youtu.be/_c79Tyl3TBo

Frank wrote on Sep 30^th, 2022 at 8:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:57pm: Frank wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:54pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:07pm: Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed. Quote: A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously. [quote]The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes." https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9 Opinion. Not 'lies'. opinion.  But you, being completely unable to counter his argument, simply label it a 'lie' so you do not have to present your own opinion - which then could be subject to analysis and refutation. We see through your cowardly rhetoric and agit-prop, ducky. Too transparent, too obvious, too thick and silly. I'm guessing an ideal Saturday night for you is Tucker in your ass, Donald in your mouth, and Putin pissing over the three of you - yeah?

There, wee bufty, your intellectual equal, your comrade in arms in the great struggle to clear the S bend  - a piece of Slovenian shite struggling to go past the S bend but never managing it. Float like a turd, stink like a gweggy.
Commune with him, he is your kind of POS.

https://youtu.be/_c79Tyl3TBo[/quote]

You strike me as a swallower.

Frank wrote on Sep 30^th, 2022 at 7:54pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:07pm: Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed. Quote: A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously. [quote]The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes." https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9

Opinion.

Not 'lies'. opinion. 

But you, being completely unable to counter his argument, simply label it a 'lie' so you do not have to present your own opinion - which then could be subject to analysis and refutation.

We see through your cowardly rhetoric and agit-prop, ducky. Too transparent, too obvious, too thick and silly.



[/quote]

Here is the problem - Tucked did know that Biden won the election, He did know that Chavez didn't rig the 2020 election or that no Italian space lasers were not used to rig the election.


Quote:

Not 'lies'. opinion.

 

Opinions that the judge said nobody with a full load of fruit would ever believe?

So now after spruiking Tucker and his commentary you are reduced to demanding that Tucker's opinions pieces are as nutty as a fruit cake, that nobody believes them and that his opinion is worthless. You seem to have finally arrived at where the rest of us started.

Now we have these options left on the table

1) Was Tucker lying?
2) Is Tucker as dumb as a dead frog?
3) All of the above.

Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond?

FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago.

Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first.....

Frank wrote on Sep 30^th, 2022 at 7:54pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 7:07pm: Not only did Fox argue that Tucker could not be believed but the Judge agreed. Quote: A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously. [quote]The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of scepticism' about the statements he makes." https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9

Opinion.

Not 'lies'. opinion. 

[/quote]

I know, right? The courts just post opinion.


Quote:

McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLC, No. 1:2019cv11161 - Document 39 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2019cv11161/527808/39/

Infotainment:


Quote:

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye

Editorial:


Quote:

Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9

Analysis:


Quote:

A judge uses Tucker Carlson’s own words against Fox News

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/09/judge-uses-tucker-carlsons-own-words-against-fox-news/

Alternative facts:


Quote:

Tucker Carlson Successfully Argues Nobody Really Believes Tucker Carlson Is Reporting Facts

https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/greedy-associates/tucker-carlson-successfully-argues-nobody-really-believes-tucker-carlson-is-reporting-facts/

Overstatement:


Quote:

Tucker Carlson Says He Doesn’t Lie on Purpose, But ‘When I Get Pissed, I Do Tend to Overstate’

https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-fox-news-doesnt-lie-admit-overstate/

Truthful hyperbole:


Quote:

The ‘Tucker Carlson defense’: It can’t be slander if no reasonable person would believe it.

https://www.courierherald.com/opinion/the-tucker-carlson-defense/

Lies:


Quote:

Tucker Carlson says he lies when ‘I’m really cornered or something’

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/572224-tucker-carlson-says-he-lies-on-show-when-im-really-cornered-or-something/

Granulaid (more lies):


Quote:

Fox News host Tucker Carlson tells interviewer: ‘I lie’

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/sep/14/fox-news-host-tucker-carlson-i-lie

Alternative facts:


Quote:

Nixing Libel Suit, Judge Says No One Expected Facts From ‘Bloviating’ Tucker Carlson

https://www.courthousenews.com/nixing-libel-suit-judge-says-no-one-expected-facts-from-bloviating-tucker-carlson/

Mendacious, tendentious:


Quote:

Tucker Carlson admits he’s a liar, but ‘tries’ not to lie on television

https://www.nydailynews.com/snyde/ny-tucker-carlson-admits-liar-20210914-g3qusuywyrh6jibcqb7vi2sdwy-story.html

Yeah-but-no-but:


Quote:

Tucker Carlson admits he lies on his show: 'I really try not to... [but] I certainly do'

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/tucker-carlson-fox-news-dave-rubin-b1919738.html

Freeeeedom, innit:


Quote:

"Fox admits they lie" and, under the First Amendment, "have the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on public airwaves."

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2014/sep/10/facebook-posts/facebook-post-claims-fox-admits-they-lie-have-righ/

Shurely shome mishtake:


Quote:

Judge Rules Tucker Carlson Is Not a Credible Source of News

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/09/judge-rules-fox-news-tucker-carlson-not-source-of-news-defamation-suit-mcdougal-trump.html

Intelligence and integrity:


Quote:

Tucker Carlson said he lies on TV out of 'weakness' and when he gets 'really cornered

https://sports.yahoo.com/tucker-carlson-said-lies-tv-074836299.html

And on and on. Page after page of falsehoods, alternative facts, and planned, deliberate, out and out lies, all confessed and out there for everyone to see.

Except you. University of Balogney, innit.

You.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 30^th, 2022 at 9:26pm:

Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond? FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago. Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first.....

Nigel Farrage had a point too.

Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles.

Cunning, no?

Mattyfisk wrote on Sep 30^th, 2022 at 11:13pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm: Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond? FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago. Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first..... Nigel Farrage had a point too. Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles. Cunning, no?

Bollox.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-your-right-to-work-in-the-uk-eu-eea-and-swiss-citizens


The UK introduced an Australian style points system. Those Poles and EU citizens who were already in the UK in 2020 are not affected.

Frank wrote on Oct 1^st, 2022 at 8:30am:

Mattyfisk wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:13pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm: Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond? FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago. Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first..... Nigel Farrage had a point too. Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles. Cunning, no? Bollox. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-your-right-to-work-in-the-uk-eu-eea-and-swiss-citizens The UK introduced an Australian style points system. Those Poles and EU citizens who were already in the UK in 2020 are not affected.

Oh, I see. So after 2020, those Poles have as much right to work as any old garden-variety Paki, eh?

Yes, I see what you mean, dear boy. Mother is minding her manners. She's being equal and inclusive and liber...

Superior Culture, innit. To date, Brexit is estimated to have cost Mother 4% of her GDP, £32 bil a year in government revenue and at least £450 a year for each of her children.

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/brexit-will-cost-uk-workers-470-pounds-year-study-predicts-2022-06-21/

Forget all the additional red tape, border queues, food shortages, extra taxes and tariffs, job lay-offs and business closures. The UK is now in the grip of what is predicted to be a long term recession, with no way out, all because of policies you espouse.

But I'm curious. Who would try to defend the integrity of Tucker Carlson? It's an impossible task, possibly even tougher than defending Brexit, which you spruiked here for years.

This can only be done by spreading lies, telling fibs, evading, obscuring and living in a surreal echo chamber of fake news - news that even Tucker says is made up in order to get ratings, as is his self-professed right in a free society.

Yes, Tucker admits it. He tells lies, and he thinks you shouldn't believe him. His entire agenda is just a bit of fun, a fake news business model; infotainment. So who would possibly try to defend him as sincere?

Very few, old boy:

You.

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 1^st, 2022 at 3:43pm:

Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 8:30am: Mattyfisk wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:13pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm: Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond? FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago. Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first..... Nigel Farrage had a point too. Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles. Cunning, no? Bollox. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-your-right-to-work-in-the-uk-eu-eea-and-swiss-citizens The UK introduced an Australian style points system. Those Poles and EU citizens who were already in the UK in 2020 are not affected. Oh, I see. So after 2020, those Poles have as much right to work as any old garden-variety Paki, eh? Yes, I see what you mean, dear boy. Mother is minding her manners. She's being equal and inclusive and liber... Superior Culture, innit. To date, Brexit is estimated to have cost Mother 4% of her GDP, £32 bil a year in government revenue and at least £450 a year for each of her children. https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/brexit-will-cost-uk-workers-470-pounds-year-study-predicts-2022-06-21/ Forget all the additional red tape, border queues, food shortages, extra taxes and tariffs, job lay-offs and business closures. The UK is now in the grip of what is predicted to be a long term recession, with no way out, all because of policies you espouse. But I'm curious. Who would try to defend the integrity of Tucker Carlson? It's an impossible task, possibly even tougher than defending Brexit, which you spruiked here for years. This can only be done by spreading lies, telling fibs, evading, obscuring and living in a surreal echo chamber of fake news - news that even Tucker says is made up in order to get ratings, as is his self-professed right in a free society. Yes, Tucker admits it. He tells lies, and he thinks you shouldn't believe him. His entire agenda is just a bit of fun, a fake news business model; infotainment. So who would possibly try to defend him as sincere? Very few, old boy: You.

Show us where Tucker 'admits' that everything he says is all lies.

Go on.

Frank wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2022 at 11:11am:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 3:43pm: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 8:30am: Mattyfisk wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:13pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm: Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond? FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago. Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first..... Nigel Farrage had a point too. Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles. Cunning, no? Bollox. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-your-right-to-work-in-the-uk-eu-eea-and-swiss-citizens The UK introduced an Australian style points system. Those Poles and EU citizens who were already in the UK in 2020 are not affected. Oh, I see. So after 2020, those Poles have as much right to work as any old garden-variety Paki, eh? Yes, I see what you mean, dear boy. Mother is minding her manners. She's being equal and inclusive and liber... Superior Culture, innit. To date, Brexit is estimated to have cost Mother 4% of her GDP, £32 bil a year in government revenue and at least £450 a year for each of her children. https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/brexit-will-cost-uk-workers-470-pounds-year-study-predicts-2022-06-21/ Forget all the additional red tape, border queues, food shortages, extra taxes and tariffs, job lay-offs and business closures. The UK is now in the grip of what is predicted to be a long term recession, with no way out, all because of policies you espouse. But I'm curious. Who would try to defend the integrity of Tucker Carlson? It's an impossible task, possibly even tougher than defending Brexit, which you spruiked here for years. This can only be done by spreading lies, telling fibs, evading, obscuring and living in a surreal echo chamber of fake news - news that even Tucker says is made up in order to get ratings, as is his self-professed right in a free society. Yes, Tucker admits it. He tells lies, and he thinks you shouldn't believe him. His entire agenda is just a bit of fun, a fake news business model; infotainment. So who would possibly try to defend him as sincere? Very few, old boy: You. Show us where Tucker 'admits' that everything he says is all lies. Go on.

Everything, eh?

Cunning. If Tucker said that, dear boy, he would not be a liar. Tucker just lies enough. Just right, as Snow White would say.


Quote:

“I lie. If I’m really cornered or something, I lie. I really try not to. I try never to lie on TV. I just don’t, you know, I don’t like lying. I certainly do it, you know, out of weakness or whatever,” Carlson said.

This one says it all.


Quote:

Carlson has no conscience. It has been seared with a hot iron. Unfortunately, his viewers seem incapable or unwilling to face the facts. They cannot be reasoned with. Carlson remains popular while he continues to lie, dividing the nation with a false narrative.

You.

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2022 at 11:19am:

Frank wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 11:11am: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 3:43pm: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 8:30am: Mattyfisk wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:13pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm: Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond? FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago. Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first..... Nigel Farrage had a point too. Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles. Cunning, no? Bollox. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-your-right-to-work-in-the-uk-eu-eea-and-swiss-citizens The UK introduced an Australian style points system. Those Poles and EU citizens who were already in the UK in 2020 are not affected. Oh, I see. So after 2020, those Poles have as much right to work as any old garden-variety Paki, eh? Yes, I see what you mean, dear boy. Mother is minding her manners. She's being equal and inclusive and liber... Superior Culture, innit. To date, Brexit is estimated to have cost Mother 4% of her GDP, £32 bil a year in government revenue and at least £450 a year for each of her children. https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/brexit-will-cost-uk-workers-470-pounds-year-study-predicts-2022-06-21/ Forget all the additional red tape, border queues, food shortages, extra taxes and tariffs, job lay-offs and business closures. The UK is now in the grip of what is predicted to be a long term recession, with no way out, all because of policies you espouse. But I'm curious. Who would try to defend the integrity of Tucker Carlson? It's an impossible task, possibly even tougher than defending Brexit, which you spruiked here for years. This can only be done by spreading lies, telling fibs, evading, obscuring and living in a surreal echo chamber of fake news - news that even Tucker says is made up in order to get ratings, as is his self-professed right in a free society. Yes, Tucker admits it. He tells lies, and he thinks you shouldn't believe him. His entire agenda is just a bit of fun, a fake news business model; infotainment. So who would possibly try to defend him as sincere? Very few, old boy: You. Show us where Tucker 'admits' that everything he says is all lies. Go on. Everything, eh? Cunning. If Tucker said that, dear boy, he would not be a liar. Tucker just lies enough. Just right, as Snow White would say. Quote: “I lie. If I’m really cornered or something, I lie. I really try not to. I try never to lie on TV. I just don’t, you know, I don’t like lying. I certainly do it, you know, out of weakness or whatever,” Carlson said. This one says it all. [quote]Carlson has no conscience. It has been seared with a hot iron. Unfortunately, his viewers seem incapable or unwilling to face the facts. They cannot be reasoned with. Carlson remains popular while he continues to lie, dividing the nation with a false narrative.

You.
[/quote]


The first quote is about white lies. As he says he doesnt knowingly lie on his shows. But this admission of white lies - which is something every one of us can admit to - is turned into 'Tucker Carkson is a liar so don't listen to ANYTHING he says' in the most predictable gweggy turdy, grimacing paki kind of Bbwianesque way. It is just your ways, as has been pointed out many times, to excuse yourself from countering his arguments with intelligent, better arguments. No, calling him a liar saved you from refuting him.


The second quote of yours - from Richard Elfers, the sage of Enumclaw, WA  :D :D :D - is just a vivid proof - repeating exaggerated, overblown BS so as not to counter any of Carlson's arguments, views, explanations for his views. And of course damning everyone who doesn't fall in with the 'no conscience' crap. I am actually surprised a little about how many people are prepared to be taken in by such cheap, manipulative cloth-eard bluster like 'seared with a hot iron'. 

Richard Elfres's media empire hq: 1186 Myrtle Ave. Enumclaw, WA 98022.  Look it up on Google maps.



Since none of you ever listen to anything but snippets extracted for hatchet jobs purposes, here is the man in his own words, not talking to someone who just wants to catch him out and twist his words.

https://youtu.be/Bh8vqof9hAk


https://youtu.be/yuMaZ49IaeY

I am very happy to hear him out, unlike you lot.

Frank wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2022 at 12:48pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 11:19am: Frank wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 11:11am: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 3:43pm: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 8:30am: Mattyfisk wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:13pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm: Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond? FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago. Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first..... Nigel Farrage had a point too. Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles. Cunning, no? Bollox. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-your-right-to-work-in-the-uk-eu-eea-and-swiss-citizens The UK introduced an Australian style points system. Those Poles and EU citizens who were already in the UK in 2020 are not affected. Oh, I see. So after 2020, those Poles have as much right to work as any old garden-variety Paki, eh? Yes, I see what you mean, dear boy. Mother is minding her manners. She's being equal and inclusive and liber... Superior Culture, innit. To date, Brexit is estimated to have cost Mother 4% of her GDP, £32 bil a year in government revenue and at least £450 a year for each of her children. https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/brexit-will-cost-uk-workers-470-pounds-year-study-predicts-2022-06-21/ Forget all the additional red tape, border queues, food shortages, extra taxes and tariffs, job lay-offs and business closures. The UK is now in the grip of what is predicted to be a long term recession, with no way out, all because of policies you espouse. But I'm curious. Who would try to defend the integrity of Tucker Carlson? It's an impossible task, possibly even tougher than defending Brexit, which you spruiked here for years. This can only be done by spreading lies, telling fibs, evading, obscuring and living in a surreal echo chamber of fake news - news that even Tucker says is made up in order to get ratings, as is his self-professed right in a free society. Yes, Tucker admits it. He tells lies, and he thinks you shouldn't believe him. His entire agenda is just a bit of fun, a fake news business model; infotainment. So who would possibly try to defend him as sincere? Very few, old boy: You. Show us where Tucker 'admits' that everything he says is all lies. Go on. Everything, eh? Cunning. If Tucker said that, dear boy, he would not be a liar. Tucker just lies enough. Just right, as Snow White would say. Quote: “I lie. If I’m really cornered or something, I lie. I really try not to. I try never to lie on TV. I just don’t, you know, I don’t like lying. I certainly do it, you know, out of weakness or whatever,” Carlson said. This one says it all. [quote]Carlson has no conscience. It has been seared with a hot iron. Unfortunately, his viewers seem incapable or unwilling to face the facts. They cannot be reasoned with. Carlson remains popular while he continues to lie, dividing the nation with a false narrative. You.

The first quote is about white lies. As he says he doesnt knowingly lie on his shows. But this admission of white lies - which is something every one of us can admit to - is turned into 'Tucker Carkson is a liar so don't listen to ANYTHING he says' in the most predictable gweggy turdy, grimacing paki kind of Bbwianesque way.
[/quote]

And now you're lying.

Fox's own lawyers admitted in a court of law that Tucker Carlson peddles bullshit.

Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Frank wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2022 at 12:48pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 11:19am: Frank wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 11:11am: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 3:43pm: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 8:30am: Mattyfisk wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:13pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm: Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond? FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago. Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first..... Nigel Farrage had a point too. Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles. Cunning, no? Bollox. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-your-right-to-work-in-the-uk-eu-eea-and-swiss-citizens The UK introduced an Australian style points system. Those Poles and EU citizens who were already in the UK in 2020 are not affected. Oh, I see. So after 2020, those Poles have as much right to work as any old garden-variety Paki, eh? Yes, I see what you mean, dear boy. Mother is minding her manners. She's being equal and inclusive and liber... Superior Culture, innit. To https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/brexit-will-cost-uk-workers-470-pounds-year-study-predicts-2022-06-21/ Forget all the additional red tape, border queues, food shortages, extra taxes pouse. But I'm curious. Who would try to defend the integrity of Tucker Carlson? It's an impossible task, possibly even tougher than defending Brexit, which you spruiked here for years. This can mber of fake news - news that even Tucker says is made up in order to get ratings, as is his self-professed right in a free society. Yes, Tucker un, a fake news business model; infotainment. So who would possibly try to defend him as sincere? Very few, old boy: You. Show us where Tucker 'admits' that everything he says is all lies. Go on. Everything, eh? Cunning. If Tucker said that, dear boy, he would not be a liar. Tucker just lies enough. Just right, as Snow White would say. Quote: “I lie. If I’m really cornered or something, I lie. I really try not to. I try never to lie on TV. I just don’t, you know, I don’t like lying. I certainly do it, you know, out of weakness or whatever,” Carlson said. This one says it all. [quote]Carlson has no conscience. It has been seared with a hot iron. Unfortunately, his viewers seem incapable or unwilling to face the facts. They cannot be reasoned with. Carlson remains popular while he continues to lie, dividing the nation with a false narrative. You.

The first quote is about white lies. As he says he doesnt knowingly lie on his shows. mit to - is turned into 'Tucker Carkson is a liar so don't listen to ANYTHING he says' in the most predictable gweggy turdy, grimacing paki kind of Bbwianesque way. It is just your ways, as has been pointed out many times, to excuse yourself from countering his arguments with intelligent, better arguments. No, calling him a liar saved you from refuting him.


The second quote of yours - from Richard Elfers, the sage of Enumclaw, WA  :D :D :D - is just a vivid proof - repeating exaggerated, overblown BS so as not to counter any of Carlson's arguments, views, explanations for his views. And of course damning everyone who doesn't fall in with the 'no conscience' crap. I am actually surprised a little about how many people are prepared to be taken in by such cheap, manipulative cloth-eard bluster like 'seared with a hot iron'. 

Richard Elfres's media empire hq: 1186 Myrtle Ave. Enumclaw, WA 98022.  Look it up on Google maps.



Since none of you ever listen to anything but snippets extracted for hatchet jobs purposes, here is the man in his own words, not talking to someone who just wants to catch him out and twist his words.

https://youtu.be/Bh8vqof9hAk


https://youtu.be/yuMaZ49IaeY

I am very happy to hear him out, unlike you lot.


[/quote]

But of course you are. Tucker confesses to lying on air and you applaud him for it.

Tucker did that puff piece after Fox's lawyers went to court to own up to his lies.Not his best day, thus the softcock interview to try to buff him back up.

Tucker's straddling that legal confession with his nightly bullshit - believe me! It requires a grotesque level of Doublethink to pull together.

Needless to say, Tucker's a fan of Putin too, dear boy. Remind you of anybody?

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/02/tucker-carlson-vladimir-putin-praise

Tucker has been caught out lying countless times. I couldn't even count the factchecks. Tucker is the biggest bullshitartist in the business, and his number one fan and believer?

You.

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2022 at 3:37pm:

Frank wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 12:48pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 11:19am: Frank wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 11:11am: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 3:43pm: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2022 at 8:30am: Mattyfisk wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 11:13pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 9:26pm: Well - Pauline has a point about immigration...... with countless people homeless and searching desperately for a rental these days - HTF are they planning to bring in 200,000 more a year and even house them, let alone have the infrastructure to support them?  Turn Sydney Harbour into a gigantic sewerage treatment pond? FFS - time to lock the gates - ten years ago. Refugees only for five years, thanks..... get this joint stabilised first..... Nigel Farrage had a point too. Now that Brexit's happened, no one can afford the local hired help, so Mother's forced to import Pakis to replace the Poles. Cunning, no? Bollox. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-your-right-to-work-in-the-uk-eu-eea-and-swiss-citizens The UK introduced an Australian style points system. Those Poles and EU citizens who were already in the UK in 2020 are not affected. Oh, I see. So after 2020, those Poles have as much right to work as any old garden-variety Paki, eh? Yes, I see what you mean, dear boy. Mother is minding her manners. She's being equal and inclusive and liber... Superior Culture, innit. To https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/brexit-will-cost-uk-workers-470-pounds-year-study-predicts-2022-06-21/ Forget all the additional red tape, border queues, food shortages, extra taxes pouse. But I'm curious. Who would try to defend the integrity of Tucker Carlson? It's an impossible task, possibly even tougher than defending Brexit, which you spruiked here for years. This can mber of fake news - news that even Tucker says is made up in order to get ratings, as is his self-professed right in a free society. Yes, Tucker un, a fake news business model; infotainment. So who would possibly try to defend him as sincere? Very few, old boy: You. Show us where Tucker 'admits' that everything he says is all lies. Go on. Everything, eh? Cunning. If Tucker said that, dear boy, he would not be a liar. Tucker just lies enough. Just right, as Snow White would say. Quote: “I lie. If I’m really cornered or something, I lie. I really try not to. I try never to lie on TV. I just don’t, you know, I don’t like lying. I certainly do it, you know, out of weakness or whatever,” Carlson said. This one says it all. [quote]Carlson has no conscience. It has been seared with a hot iron. Unfortunately, his viewers seem incapable or unwilling to face the facts. They cannot be reasoned with. Carlson remains popular while he continues to lie, dividing the nation with a false narrative. You. The first quote is about white lies. As he says he doesnt knowingly lie on his shows. mit to - is turned into 'Tucker Carkson is a liar so don't listen to ANYTHING he says' in the most predictable gweggy turdy, grimacing paki kind of Bbwianesque way. It is just your ways, as has been pointed out many times, to excuse yourself from countering his arguments with intelligent, better arguments. No, calling him a liar saved you from refuting him. The second quote of yours - from Richard Elfers, the sage of Enumclaw, WA  :D :D :D - is just a vivid proof - repeating exaggerated, overblown BS so as not to counter any of Carlson's arguments, views, explanations for his views. And of course damning everyone who doesn't fall in with the 'no conscience' crap. I am actually surprised a little about how many people are prepared to be taken in by such cheap, manipulative cloth-eard bluster like 'seared with a hot iron'.  Richard Elfres's media empire hq: 1186 Myrtle Ave. Enumclaw, WA 98022.  Look it up on Google maps. Since none of you ever listen to anything but snippets extracted for hatchet jobs purposes, here is the man in his own words, not talking to someone who just wants to catch him out and twist his words. https://youtu.be/Bh8vqof9hAk https://youtu.be/yuMaZ49IaeY I am very happy to hear him out, unlike you lot.

But of course you are. Tucker confesses to lying on air and you applaud him for it.

Tucker did that puff piece after Fox's lawyers went to court to own up to his lies.Not his best day, thus the softcock interview to try to buff him back up.

Tucker's straddling that legal confession with his nightly bullshit - believe me! It requires a grotesque level of Doublethink to pull together.

Needless to say, Tucker's a fan of Putin too, dear boy. Remind you of anybody?

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/02/tucker-carlson-vladimir-putin-praise

Tucker has been caught out lying countless times. I couldn't even count the factchecks. Tucker is the biggest bullshitartist in the business, and his number one fan and believer?

You.
[/quote]

Unsurprisingly, paki, you assert but not evidence.

You are very upset, emotional and fraught, I see that

Gweggy tujd, Bbwian - come and hold wee buftie Paul's hand. He's  a bit distraught, tired and emotional.  Twiggewed is the current technical, scientific term.

There, there. Have a banana and 10 rupees. Ducky will kiss it good in no time.

Frank wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2022 at 6:35pm:

But of course you are. Tucker confesses to lying on air and you applaud him for it.

you should pull your head out of your arse sore end

He's given you a court decision ruling that Tuckers claims are bullshit and should not be believed and he's given you a quote from tucker himself admitting as much. And all you've done is make excuses and pretend that no one has provided evidence.

You know that horse that you can lead to water but not make drink? That horse's name must have been 'Frank the sore end moron'

John Smith wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2022 at 7:46pm:

Frank wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 6:35pm: But of course you are. Tucker confesses to lying on air and you applaud him for it. you should pull your head out of your arse sore end He's given you a court decision ruling that Tuckers claims are bullshit and should not be believed and he's given you a quote from tucker himself admitting as much. And all you've done is make excuses and pretend that no one has provided evidence. You know that horse that you can lead to water but not make drink? That horse's name must have been 'Frank the sore end moron'

;D

Quote:

Unsurprisingly, paki, you assert but not evidence. You are very upset, emotional and fraught, I see that

The evidence is here for all to see. All three pages worth, link after link after link. Who's a silly old blind bint then?

At least Tucker fussed up. You'd like no play no-speaka, eh?

Alas, there are none so blind as the NESBers.

You.

Silly me...

I'd assumed this thread was debating Pauline Hanson, and not
Tucker Carlson.      Must be old age creeping up?

AusGeoff wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2022 at 8:57pm:

Silly me... I'd assumed this thread was debating Pauline Hanson, and not Tucker Carlson.      Must be old age creeping up?

Tucker is a substantial danger to the USA. Pauline is just a misguided opportunist.

Tucker has no redeeming features. Pauline likes to have her snout in the trough.

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2022 at 8:47pm:

Quote: Unsurprisingly, paki, you assert but not evidence. You are very upset, emotional and fraught, I see that The evidence is here for all to see. All three pages worth, link after link after link. Who's a silly old blind bint then? At least Tucker fussed up. You'd like no play no-speaka, eh? Alas, there are none so blind as the NESBers. You.

Link after link to dishonest gweggy paki hatchet jobs and silly ducky quacking.
A danger. A man telling the world that the paki turdy duckies are full of paki ducky turd - danger!!


You loons should hear yourselves! Someone utters 'Wrong thought' - and you shoil yourselves!!! You are besides yourselves the moment anyone thinks ever so slightly differently.

Frank wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2022 at 10:49pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 8:47pm: Quote: Unsurprisingly, paki, you assert but not evidence. You are very upset, emotional and fraught, I see that The evidence is here for all to see. All three pages worth, link after link after link. Who's a silly old blind bint then? At least Tucker fussed up. You'd like no play no-speaka, eh? Alas, there are none so blind as the NESBers. You. Link after link to dishonest gweggy paki hatchet jobs and silly ducky quacking. A danger. A man telling the world that the paki turdy duckies are full of paki ducky turd - danger!! You loons should hear yourselves! Someone utters 'Wrong thought' - and you shoil yourselves!!! You are besides yourselves the moment anyone thinks ever so slightly differently.

Someone utters lies, and you start salivating. So, we'll ask you.

Do you, old boy, uphold the use of porkies?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Frank wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2022 at 10:49pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 8:47pm: Quote: Unsurprisingly, paki, you assert but not evidence. You are very upset, emotional and fraught, I see that The evidence is here for all to see. All three pages worth, link after link after link. Who's a silly old blind bint then? At least Tucker fussed up. You'd like no play no-speaka, eh? Alas, there are none so blind as the NESBers. You. Link after link to dishonest gweggy paki hatchet jobs and silly ducky quacking. A danger. A man telling the world that the paki turdy duckies are full of paki ducky turd - danger!! You loons should hear yourselves! Someone utters 'Wrong thought' - and you shoil yourselves!!! You are besides yourselves the moment anyone thinks ever so slightly differently.

You've studies psychoanalysis, yes?

What precisely do you think is wrong with you? Or have you lost all points of reference at this stage?

I mean, you're response to being humiliated is to humiliate yourself further. What do you think that says?

Frank wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2022 at 10:49pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 8:47pm: Quote: Unsurprisingly, paki, you assert but not evidence. You are very upset, emotional and fraught, I see that The evidence is here for all to see. All three pages worth, link after link after link. Who's a silly old blind bint then? At least Tucker fussed up. You'd like no play no-speaka, eh? Alas, there are none so blind as the NESBers. You. Link after link to dishonest gweggy paki hatchet jobs and silly ducky quacking. A danger. A man telling the world that the paki turdy duckies are full of paki ducky turd - danger!! You loons should hear yourselves! Someone utters 'Wrong thought' - and you shoil yourselves!!! You are besides yourselves the moment anyone thinks ever so slightly differently.

Quote:

danger!! danger!! danger!!

Does Frank = Will Robinson ?

or

Does Frank = the Robot ?

Dnarever wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2022 at 9:22am:

Frank wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 10:49pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 8:47pm: Quote: Unsurprisingly, paki, you assert but not evidence. You are very upset, emotional and fraught, I see that The evidence is here for all to see. All three pages worth, link after link after link. Who's a silly old blind bint then? At least Tucker fussed up. You'd like no play no-speaka, eh? Alas, there are none so blind as the NESBers. You. Link after link to dishonest gweggy paki hatchet jobs and silly ducky quacking. A danger. A man telling the world that the paki turdy duckies are full of paki ducky turd - danger!! You loons should hear yourselves! Someone utters 'Wrong thought' - and you shoil yourselves!!! You are besides yourselves the moment anyone thinks ever so slightly differently. [quote]danger!! danger!! danger!!

Does Frank = Will Robinson

or

Does Frank = the Robot ?
[/quote]


I suspect he's the planet's indigenous slime attacking them.

mothra wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2022 at 8:58am:

You've studies psychoanalysis, yes? What precisely do you think is wrong with you? Or have you lost all points of reference at this stage? I mean, you're response to being humiliated is to humiliate yourself further. What do you think that says?

;D ;D silly bint.



To be woke is a blessing. We are the first human beings who have ever existed who are right about absolutely everything. It’s such a relief to know that our views will never be criticised or ridiculed by future generations.  In fact, there are all sorts of benefits to being on the right side of history. For one thing, we can encourage big tech censorship without any fear that it might one day be used against us.

But it’s so exhausting having to constantly re-educate the masses. So far this week I’ve got a woman fired for claiming that sex is binary, shouted abuse at an old man collecting money for that imperialist “charity” the Royal British Legion and burned some books by Enid Blyton due to their outdated stereotypes. Important work never ends.

As a baby, my first words were: “Seize the means of production”

People often say to me: “Mothra, how do you have the stamina to be constantly standing up for justice in the face of incredible odds?” I honestly don’t know the answer. I was fortunate enough to be born with innate talents and I suppose my most endearing features are my compassion, my eloquence, my formidable intelligence and, above all, my humility.

I have always been socially and politically aware. As a baby, my first words were: “Seize the means of production.” Minority groups adore me, because I am brave enough to stand up for their rights, even when they don’t know what’s best for themselves.

I have accepted my calling to re-orientate the world according to the values of progressivism and social justice. For we shall only achieve true diversity when everyone thinks the same way as me.
Mothra Theresa

AusGeoff wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2022 at 8:57pm:

Silly me... I'd assumed this thread was debating Pauline Hanson, and not Tucker Carlson.      Must be old age creeping up?

Discussion can evolve.

Dnarever wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2022 at 10:04am:

AusGeoff wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 8:57pm: Silly me... I'd assumed this thread was debating Pauline Hanson, and not Tucker Carlson.      Must be old age creeping up? Discussion can evolve.

Not at all.

They are hate figures for the mindless progs who throw the same tantrum about Hanson, Carlson, using the same tired slogans. 

Frank wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2022 at 9:42am:

mothra wrote on Oct 3rd, 2022 at 8:58am: You've studies psychoanalysis, yes? What precisely do you think is wrong with you? Or have you lost all points of reference at this stage? I mean, you're response to being humiliated is to humiliate yourself further. What do you think that says? ;D ;D silly bint. To be woke is a blessing. We are the first human beings who have ever existed who are right about absolutely everything. It’s such a relief to know that our views will never be criticised or ridiculed by future generations.  In fact, there are all sorts of benefits to being on the right side of history. For one thing, we can encourage big tech censorship without any fear that it might one day be used against us. But it’s so exhausting having to constantly re-educate the masses. So far this week I’ve got a woman fired for claiming that sex is binary, shouted abuse at an old man collecting money for that imperialist “charity” the Royal British Legion and burned some books by Enid Blyton due to their outdated stereotypes. Important work never ends. As a baby, my first words were: “Seize the means of production” People often say to me: “Mothra, how do you have the stamina to be constantly standing up for justice in the face of incredible odds?” I honestly don’t know the answer. I was fortunate enough to be born with innate talents and I suppose my most endearing features are my compassion, my eloquence, my formidable intelligence and, above all, my humility. I have always been socially and politically aware. As a baby, my first words were: “Seize the means of production.” Minority groups adore me, because I am brave enough to stand up for their rights, even when they don’t know what’s best for themselves. I have accepted my calling to re-orientate the world according to the values of progressivism and social justice. For we shall only achieve true diversity when everyone thinks the same way as me. Mothra Theresa

He's got you there, Mother. Look, the old boy's just defending Tucker's right to have a different opinion, no? Is that so bad, really?

As Tucker has shown, it's legal to lie on TV if you phrase it in such a way as being an opinion.

You know, "we've all seen the evidence that Hugo Chavez started Dominion to rig the American voting system, or we all know that Hunter Biden is a drug-addicted, sex addict money-launderer who gives his father a cut: these are the facts.

Tucker's lilting expository is actually carefully contrived framing so he can cast lies as opinion and not get sued. It's his modus operandi: carefully written lies prefixed with cunning little legal waivers.

When Tucker is finally forced to admit this in court, he goes and does a puff piece with a friendly podcaster. "Do I lie? Oh, I try not to. But don't we all tell the odd white lie? I mean, who among us can cast the first stone?"

Not Tucker, oh no.

Can you see the old boy's point? Tucker is perfectly entitled to have a nightly TV show comprised almost solely of lies. They're just alternative opinions, and do you know?

The leftards don't like that, oh no. They're now picking on the old boy. Such bullies, so unfair.

I dont know about you, Mother, I may not agree with the old boy's lies, but I'll fight to the death for his right to tell them, no?

The invasion of Iraq, the benefits of CO2, Brexit, Putin, Trump  - it's good to have different views. That's the sign of a healthy democracy.

If things get tough, you can always just say you were just expressing an opinion. Who among us has not told the odd white lie?

Superior culture, innit.

Frank wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2022 at 10:30am:

Dnarever wrote on Oct 3rd, 2022 at 10:04am: AusGeoff wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 8:57pm: Silly me... I'd assumed this thread was debating Pauline Hanson, and not Tucker Carlson.      Must be old age creeping up? Discussion can evolve. Not at all. They are hate figures for the mindless progs who throw the same tantrum about Hanson, Carlson, using the same tired slogans.

The old boy has a point. Yes, Pauline and Tucker are indeed part of the same school of frothing vitriol masquerading as political opinion.

It's why Pauline has nothing constructive to add to parliament, just white-fisted hissy fits and temper tants.

The difference between them is that Pauline is dumb enough to believe it. Tucker's in it for the fun. Tucker's in the business of monetising political rhetoric.

Tucker knows he's lying. When he comes on TV and says someone in the mail room tampered with his Hunter Biden flash drive, he's stalling, playing for time to let the lawyers sign off. When he spends weeks explaining how Dominion pulled the switch on the 2020 election, then comes out to say sorry, he made the whole thing up, he's not really. He plans to keep on going and do it all again. He has to, that's his schtick.

Tucker's entire program is about stacking up and getting out of lies. Tucker's in the business of creating lies. Pauline's in the business of repeating them, having them exposed and looking like a silly old gusher.

Sound like anyone we know?

Frank wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2022 at 10:30am:

Dnarever wrote on Oct 3rd, 2022 at 10:04am: AusGeoff wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 8:57pm: Silly me... I'd assumed this thread was debating Pauline Hanson, and not Tucker Carlson.      Must be old age creeping up? Discussion can evolve. Not at all. They are hate figures for the mindless progs who throw the same tantrum about Hanson, Carlson, using the same tired slogans.

So now you argue that it isn't off topic because you are able to show the connection they have within the topic right ?

It's just a logical expansion of the topic.

I doubt that you really meant to say that.

I understand your situation given that the right have not evolved anything in many decades.

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2022 at 10:53am:

Frank wrote on Oct 3rd, 2022 at 9:42am: mothra wrote on Oct 3rd, 2022 at 8:58am: You've studies psychoanalysis, yes? What precisely do you think is wrong with you? Or have you lost all points of reference at this stage? I mean, you're response to being humiliated is to humiliate yourself further. What do you think that says? ;D ;D silly bint. To be woke is a blessing. We are the first human beings who have ever existed who are right about absolutely everything. It’s such a relief to know that our views will never be criticised or ridiculed by future generations.  In fact, there are all sorts of benefits to being on the right side of history. For one thing, we can encourage big tech censorship without any fear that it might one day be used against us. But it’s so exhausting having to constantly re-educate the masses. So far this week I’ve got a woman fired for claiming that sex is binary, shouted abuse at an old man collecting money for that imperialist “charity” the Royal British Legion and burned some books by Enid Blyton due to their outdated stereotypes. Important work never ends. As a baby, my first words were: “Seize the means of production” People often say to me: “Mothra, how do you have the stamina to be constantly standing up for justice in the face of incredible odds?” I honestly don’t know the answer. I was fortunate enough to be born with innate talents and I suppose my most endearing features are my compassion, my eloquence, my formidable intelligence and, above all, my humility. I have always been socially and politically aware. As a baby, my first words were: “Seize the means of production.” Minority groups adore me, because I am brave enough to stand up for their rights, even when they don’t know what’s best for themselves. I have accepted my calling to re-orientate the world according to the values of progressivism and social justice. For we shall only achieve true diversity when everyone thinks the same way as me. Mothra Theresa He's got you there, Mother. Look, the old boy's just defending Tucker's right to have a different opinion, no? Is that so bad, really? As Tucker has shown, it's legal to lie on TV if you phrase it in such a way as being an opinion. You know, "we've all seen the evidence that Hugo Chavez started Dominion to rig the American voting system, or we all know that Hunter Biden is a drug-addicted, sex addict money-launderer who gives his father a cut: these are the facts. Tucker's lilting expository is actually carefully contrived framing so he can cast lies as opinion and not get sued. It's his modus operandi: carefully written lies prefixed with cunning little legal waivers. When Tucker is finally forced to admit this in court, he goes and does a puff piece with a friendly podcaster. "Do I lie? Oh, I try not to. But don't we all tell the odd white lie? I mean, who among us can cast the first stone?" Not Tucker, oh no. Can you see the old boy's point? Tucker is perfectly entitled to have a nightly TV show comprised almost solely of lies. They're just alternative opinions, and do you know? The leftards don't like that, oh no. They're now picking on the old boy. Such bullies, so unfair. I dont know about you, Mother, I may not agree with the old boy's lies, but I'll fight to the death for his right to tell them, no? The invasion of Iraq, the benefits of CO2, Brexit, Putin, Trump  - it's good to have different views. That's the sign of a healthy democracy. If things get tough, you can always just say you were just expressing an opinion. Who among us has not told the odd white lie? Superior culture, innit.

Quote:

ucker's right to have a different opinion, no?

Yes Ucker (-T) is entitled to any and all of his alternate truths.

The first "ucker" was accidental but I liked it enough for the second.

Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2022 at 12:37pm:

Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' " "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

I doubt that the judge ever came to terms about just how stupid the Tucker audience are. They seem to all 100% believe everything he has to say. They don't even mind that a lot of his statements contradict other things he has said.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2022 at 12:37pm:

Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' " "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Except the old boy. He believes. Alternative values, you see.

Intelligence and integrity, innit.

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 1:16pm:

Ron wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 11:06am: Good on Pauline for telling Senator Mehreen Faruqi to "piss off back to Pakistan". We need more politicians with the guts to take these ungrateful immigrants to task. Another leftie that doesn't understand the meaning of the word" racism". If she wants to go on about human rights and racism she only has to look at her place of birth and the persecution of Christians by the Mussies. Thank you for this well considered, thoughtful comment Ron, in support of the execrable Pauline Hanson whom you seem to see as a vision of reason and rationale. The twice divorced Hanson was a high school dropout, after getting pregnant at age 15—which marked the end of any further education. As a result, she has a very limited intellectual mindset, and a poor grasp of politics, race relations, civil law, sexual and gender issues etc. Recall, her main claim to fame(?) was running a fish and chip shop, after working as a clerical assistant and barmaid.  Obviously then she's not the sharpest tool in the toolbox LOL. On the other hand we have Mehreen Faruqi... who holds a Bachelor of Engineering, a Master of Engineering Science, and a Doctorate in Environmental Engineering. So I think we can see who's better educated and therefore far better qualified in order to work in parliament. https://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-my-view-on-issues-is-based-on-common-sense-and-my-experience-as-a-mother-of-four-children-pauline-hanson-12-36-50.jpg Hanson's crude, racist insults directed at Faruqi further demonstrated her lack of formal education and her inability to move on from the 1950s days of black and white TV, 'reds under the beds' and 'the yellow peril'.

She is not credentialled to your high and exacting standards, Sage of Gippsland?  Your reflex fetish for credentialism reminds me of the illiterate's reverence for books he cannot read.

I think it's bloody marvellous that someone like Hanson can be elected and then re-elected and re-elected, even after being convicted, jailed and exonerated.

That some credential-fetishist hick from the Boondocks, buried in online newspaper-thought, tut-tuts disapprovingly is the cherry on top.

Pauline V the liblabgreen party and the media, one voice speaking for many.

Pauline Hanson?  WOFTAM.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   ::) ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 22^nd, 2022 at 10:03pm:

Pauline Hanson?  WOFTAM.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   ::) ::)

Pauline was elected by the people of Australia in numerous elections. If you don't like it bad luck the people have spoken tsk tsk tsk.  ::)

Former labor leader Mark Latham was also elected by the people of NSW for One Nation.

mothra wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2022 at 8:58am:

Frank wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 10:49pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 8:47pm: Quote: Unsurprisingly, paki, you assert but not evidence. You are very upset, emotional and fraught, I see that The evidence is here for all to see. All three pages worth, link after link after link. Who's a silly old blind bint then? At least Tucker fussed up. You'd like no play no-speaka, eh? Alas, there are none so blind as the NESBers. You. Link after link to dishonest gweggy paki hatchet jobs and silly ducky quacking. A danger. A man telling the world that the paki turdy duckies are full of paki ducky turd - danger!! You loons should hear yourselves! Someone utters 'Wrong thought' - and you shoil yourselves!!! You are besides yourselves the moment anyone thinks ever so slightly differently. You've studies psychoanalysis, yes? What precisely do you think is wrong with you? Or have you lost all points of reference at this stage? I mean, you're response to being humiliated is to humiliate yourself further. What do you think that says?

You've studies psychoanalysis, yes?

;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  That's like a politician studying ethics.... or some backwoods 'magistrate' actually studying the rules of jurisprudence...

Ron wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 11:06am:

Good on Pauline for telling Senator Mehreen Faruqi to "piss off back to Pakistan". We need more politicians with the guts to take these ungrateful immigrants to task. Another leftie that doesn't understand the meaning of the word" racism". If she wants to go on about human rights and racism she only has to look at her place of birth and the persecution of Christians by the Mussies.

Senator Mehreen Faruqi was elected by the Australian people into the Australian senate just like Senator Hanson....Senator Hanson's personal attack on another Senator and all migrants was an insult to our democracy!!!

::) ::) ::)

mothra wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2022 at 8:58am:

Frank wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 10:49pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 8:47pm: Quote: Unsurprisingly, paki, you assert but not evidence. You are very upset, emotional and fraught, I see that The evidence is here for all to see. All three pages worth, link after link after link. Who's a silly old blind bint then? At least Tucker fussed up. You'd like no play no-speaka, eh? Alas, there are none so blind as the NESBers. You. Link after link to dishonest gweggy paki hatchet jobs and silly ducky quacking. A danger. A man telling the world that the paki turdy duckies are full of paki ducky turd - danger!! You loons should hear yourselves! Someone utters 'Wrong thought' - and you shoil yourselves!!! You are besides yourselves the moment anyone thinks ever so slightly differently. You've studies psychoanalysis, yes? What precisely do you think is wrong with you? Or have you lost all points of reference at this stage? I mean, you're response to being humiliated is to humiliate yourself further. What do you think that says?

Are all the dishes, vacuuming, ironing done, bint???  Chop chop.

philperth2010 wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2022 at 9:06am:

Ron wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 11:06am: Good on Pauline for telling Senator Mehreen Faruqi to "piss off back to Pakistan". We need more politicians with the guts to take these ungrateful immigrants to task. Another leftie that doesn't understand the meaning of the word" racism". If she wants to go on about human rights and racism she only has to look at her place of birth and the persecution of Christians by the Mussies. Senator Mehreen Faruqi was elected by the Australian people into the Australian senate just like Senator Hanson....Senator Hanson's personal attack on another Senator and all migrants was an insult to our democracy!!! ::) ::) ::)

:D   :D
Thank you, Bbwian.


On the day of the Queen’s death, Faruqi tweeted: “I cannot mourn the leader of a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth of colonised peoples.”



Hanson quote-tweeted that post to her own followers, replying: “Your attitude appalls and disgusts me. When you immigrated to Australia you took every advantage of this country. You took citizenship, bought multiple homes, and a job in a parliament. It’s clear you’re not happy, so pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan.”

Far from insulting,  Hanson showed admirable restraint. Faruqi's utterance and the sentiments and black heart behind it are insolent and disgraceful. She is a perjurer like Livid Thorpe - took the oath but once in the job, broke it and disgraced herself. They should both resign.

Frank wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 2:19pm:

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 1:16pm: On the other hand we have Mehreen Faruqi... who holds a Bachelor of Engineering, a Master of Engineering Science, and a Doctorate in Environmental Engineering. So I think we can see who's better educated and therefore far better qualified in order to work in parliament. :D :D :D :D :D You have a credential-fetish, pal, like illiterates have for books, no matter what's in them.  There are no 'education qualifications' to be in parliament. Ben Chiefly was a train driver. But perhaps Faruqi's PhD thesis in particular qualifies her for being a Greens senator, spouting toxic nonsense: Intensification of anaerobic lagoons for abattoir wastewater treatment and biogas recovery The art and science of emitting stinking hot gas.

Got Faruqi  in one  ;D

Frank wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2022 at 9:49am:

philperth2010 wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 9:06am: Ron wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 11:06am: Good on Pauline for telling Senator Mehreen Faruqi to "piss off back to Pakistan". We need more politicians with the guts to take these ungrateful immigrants to task. Another leftie that doesn't understand the meaning of the word" racism". If she wants to go on about human rights and racism she only has to look at her place of birth and the persecution of Christians by the Mussies. Senator Mehreen Faruqi was elected by the Australian people into the Australian senate just like Senator Hanson....Senator Hanson's personal attack on another Senator and all migrants was an insult to our democracy!!! ::) ::) ::) :D   :D Thank you, Bbwian. On the day of the Queen’s death, Faruqi tweeted: “I cannot mourn the leader of a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth of colonised peoples.” Hanson quote-tweeted that post to her own followers, replying: “Your attitude appalls and disgusts me. When you immigrated to Australia you took every advantage of this country. You took citizenship, bought multiple homes, and a job in a parliament. It’s clear you’re not happy, so pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan.” Far from insulting,  Hanson showed admirable restraint. Faruqi's utterance and the sentiments and black heart behind it are insolent and disgraceful. She is a perjurer like Livid Thorpe - took the oath but once in the job, broke it and disgraced herself. They should both resign.

Pauline Hanson has a history of using racist overtones to appeal to her like minded followers who have an axe to grind against migrants and Aboriginal people....If you judge everyone by how long they have been in Australia, Aboriginal people have every right to tell Hanson to piss of back to where her ancestors came from....Hanson is a racist low life!!!

:) :) :)

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 3:20pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 2:19pm: AusGeoff wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 1:16pm: On the other hand we have Mehreen Faruqi... who holds a Bachelor of Engineering, a Master of Engineering Science, and a Doctorate in Environmental Engineering. So I think we can see who's better educated and therefore far better qualified in order to work in parliament. You have a credential-fetish, pal, like illiterates have for books, no matter what's in them.  There are no 'education qualifications' to be in parliament. Ben Chiefly was a train driver. So... a little hypothetical Frank. You have two local candidates running for a political seat.  One runs a fish and chip shop, and the other is a triple-certificated university graduate.  The former is transphobic, racist, xenophobic, Islamophobic, anti-multicultural and anti-Asian, and a global warming denier. The latter is none of those things, except of course being a Muslim. So Frank, which one would you choose, and more importantly why?

Having a University education is not a pre-requisite to having common sense & life experience.

Hanson may not be an eloquent speaker but she speaks from the heart.

Both sides of Politics were shyte scared of her  conspired to have her thrown in jail. all well educated men & women. Tony Abbott & Peter Beattie. A right pair of educated arseholes.

And here you are another half smart bastard questioning peoples education levels & intelligence like a few other snobby, self righteous twerps here.

I've seen more University educated wankers that do not have an ounce of commonsense or how to put it to use cause real on the job problems make make some of the most ridiculous statements.... critical thinkers??? Haaa ;D

It's what's has bought politics & the Union movement undone in the past 40 years.

Both full of university educated professional knowalls so full of themselves that they that they lose track of what they're job should be.

The old mantra that "we've got to be better educated" & therefore smarter & more professional by having uni educated people in both has not been as beneficial as it was cracked up to be.

They only thing they excel at is wasting tax payers money & lining their own pockets.

Mehreen Faruqi v Pauline Hanson

Hanson before disgruntled woke whiners.

Triple certificated university graduate - i.e. no idea of the real world from the perpetual ivory tower, has no ida opf how asutralian CULTURE works, and a close eye on the main stream for life payout.

I know which I'd prefer..

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 28^th, 2022 at 3:59pm:

What does the Paki bring to the table in Australian politics?  How to learn to live in the Third World? Asking for a friend....

There is nothing less credible than posting Tucker Carlson.

Frank wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2022 at 10:30am:

Dnarever wrote on Oct 3rd, 2022 at 10:04am: AusGeoff wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 8:57pm: Silly me... I'd assumed this thread was debating Pauline Hanson, and not Tucker Carlson.      Must be old age creeping up? Discussion can evolve. Not at all. They are hate figures for the mindless progs who throw the same tantrum about Hanson, Carlson, using the same tired slogans.

They are both racist in complete different ways. Tucker is more commercially based racist where Pauline is more stupidity related red neck based.

Pauline's first speech was fairly mild on race it had some truth to it however when one nation was formed the influence was deeply racist it it never got any better. They targeted the race vote as an advantage.

U
philperth2010 wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2022 at 10:15am:

Frank wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 9:49am: philperth2010 wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 9:06am: Ron wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 11:06am: Good on Pauline for telling Senator Mehreen Faruqi to "piss off back to Pakistan". We need more politicians with the guts to take these ungrateful immigrants to task. Another leftie that doesn't understand the meaning of the word" racism". If she wants to go on about human rights and racism she only has to look at her place of birth and the persecution of Christians by the Mussies. Senator Mehreen Faruqi was elected by the Australian people into the Australian senate just like Senator Hanson....Senator Hanson's personal attack on another Senator and all migrants was an insult to our democracy!!! ::) ::) ::) :D   :D Thank you, Bbwian. On the day of the Queen’s death, Faruqi tweeted: “I cannot mourn the leader of a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth of colonised peoples.” Hanson quote-tweeted that post to her own followers, replying: “Your attitude appalls and disgusts me. When you immigrated to Australia you took every advantage of this country. You took citizenship, bought multiple homes, and a job in a parliament. It’s clear you’re not happy, so pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan.” Far from insulting,  Hanson showed admirable restraint. Faruqi's utterance and the sentiments and black heart behind it are insolent and disgraceful. She is a perjurer like Livid Thorpe - took the oath but once in the job, broke it and disgraced herself. They should both resign. Pauline Hanson has a history of using racist overtones to appeal to her like minded followers who have an axe to grind against migrants and Aboriginal people....If you judge everyone by how long they have been in Australia, Aboriginal people have every right to tell Hanson to piss of back to where her ancestors came from....Hanson is a racist low life!!! :) :) :)

Very stupid. Preening, pouting and very stupid.

By your 'logic' no Pakistani, no Aborigine, no brown person can be countered about anything because they are tinted. Arguing with them or - the horror! - rejecting their views is racist. The 'racist'  shibboleth/stick exclusively reserved for the tinted to browbeat whites.

Faruqi IS from Pakistan, left Pakistan FOR Australia, swore allegiance to the Queen, holds office and privilege AS a Senator in the 'racist, thieving, colonising empire'. Calls the queen, to whom she lyingly swore allegiance, the leader of a racist, thieving empire on the day the queen dies. A disgraceful, insolent idiot who perjured herself - and it takes an idiot like you to rush to Faruqi's defence simply because she is Pakistani/tinted.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2022 at 11:06am:

Frank wrote on Oct 3rd, 2022 at 10:30am: Dnarever wrote on Oct 3rd, 2022 at 10:04am: AusGeoff wrote on Oct 2nd, 2022 at 8:57pm: Silly me... I'd assumed this thread was debating Pauline Hanson, and not Tucker Carlson.      Must be old age creeping up? Discussion can evolve. Not at all. They are hate figures for the mindless progs who throw the same tantrum about Hanson, Carlson, using the same tired slogans.  They are both racist in complete different ways. Tucker is more commercially based racist where Pauline is more stupidity related red neck based. Pauline's first speech was fairly mild on race it had some truth to it however when one nation was formed the influence was deeply racist it it never got any better. They targeted the race vote as an advantage.

:D :D :D

Because you are sooo sophisticated, flatfooted duckwit!

https://mobile.twitter.com/fasc1nate/status/1602543098881794048

Frank wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2022 at 11:30am:

U philperth2010 wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 10:15am: Frank wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 9:49am: philperth2010 wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 9:06am: Ron wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 11:06am: Good on Pauline for telling Senator Mehreen Faruqi to "piss off back to Pakistan". We need more politicians with the guts to take these ungrateful immigrants to task. Another leftie that doesn't understand the meaning of the word" racism". If she wants to go on about human rights and racism she only has to look at her place of birth and the persecution of Christians by the Mussies. Senator Mehreen Faruqi was elected by the Australian people into the Australian senate just like Senator Hanson....Senator Hanson's personal attack on another Senator and all migrants was an insult to our democracy!!! ::) ::) ::) :D   :D Thank you, Bbwian. On the day of the Queen’s death, Faruqi tweeted: “I cannot mourn the leader of a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth of colonised peoples.” Hanson quote-tweeted that post to her own followers, replying: “Your attitude appalls and disgusts me. When you immigrated to Australia you took every advantage of this country. You took citizenship, bought multiple homes, and a job in a parliament. It’s clear you’re not happy, so pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan.” Far from insulting,  Hanson showed admirable restraint. Faruqi's utterance and the sentiments and black heart behind it are insolent and disgraceful. She is a perjurer like Livid Thorpe - took the oath but once in the job, broke it and disgraced herself. They should both resign. Pauline Hanson has a history of using racist overtones to appeal to her like minded followers who have an axe to grind against migrants and Aboriginal people....If you judge everyone by how long they have been in Australia, Aboriginal people have every right to tell Hanson to piss of back to where her ancestors came from....Hanson is a racist low life!!! :) :) :) Very stupid. Preening, pouting and very stupid. By your 'logic' no Pakistani, no Aborigine, no brown person can be countered about anything because they are tinted. Arguing with them or - the horror! - rejecting their views is racist. The 'racist'  shibboleth/stick exclusively reserved for the tinted to browbeat whites. Faruqi IS from Pakistan, left Pakistan FOR Australia, swore allegiance to the Queen, holds office and privilege AS a Senator in the 'racist, thieving, colonising empire'. Calls the queen, to whom she lyingly swore allegiance, the leader of a racist, thieving empire on the day the queen dies. A disgraceful, insolent idiot who perjured herself - and it takes an idiot like you to rush to Faruqi's defence simply because she is Pakistani/tinted.

I am not defending anyone Fwank....Pakistani, Aborigine and brown people have no problem attracting criticism....I could dispute Faruqi's comments without resorting to bullshit racist overtones unlike you and Hanson....You however are to racist and stupid to see anything but black versus white....You are a racist Fwank like Hanson....Why deny it???

:-? :-? :-?

philperth2010 wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2022 at 12:58pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 11:30am: U philperth2010 wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 10:15am: Frank wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 9:49am: philperth2010 wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 9:06am: Ron wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 11:06am: Good on Pauline for telling Senator Mehreen Faruqi to "piss off back to Pakistan". We need more politicians with the guts to take these ungrateful immigrants to task. Another leftie that doesn't understand the meaning of the word" racism". If she wants to go on about human rights and racism she only has to look at her place of birth and the persecution of Christians by the Mussies. Senator Mehreen Faruqi was elected by the Australian people into the Australian senate just like Senator Hanson....Senator Hanson's personal attack on another Senator and all migrants was an insult to our democracy!!! ::) ::) ::) :D   :D Thank you, Bbwian. On the day of the Queen’s death, Faruqi tweeted: “I cannot mourn the leader of a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth of colonised peoples.” Hanson quote-tweeted that post to her own followers, replying: “Your attitude appalls and disgusts me. When you immigrated to Australia you took every advantage of this country. You took citizenship, bought multiple homes, and a job in a parliament. It’s clear you’re not happy, so pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan.” Far from insulting,  Hanson showed admirable restraint. Faruqi's utterance and the sentiments and black heart behind it are insolent and disgraceful. She is a perjurer like Livid Thorpe - took the oath but once in the job, broke it and disgraced herself. They should both resign. Pauline Hanson has a history of using racist overtones to appeal to her like minded followers who have an axe to grind against migrants and Aboriginal people....If you judge everyone by how long they have been in Australia, Aboriginal people have every right to tell Hanson to piss of back to where her ancestors came from....Hanson is a racist low life!!! :) :) :) Very stupid. Preening, pouting and very stupid. By your 'logic' no Pakistani, no Aborigine, no brown person can be countered about anything because they are tinted. Arguing with them or - the horror! - rejecting their views is racist. The 'racist'  shibboleth/stick exclusively reserved for the tinted to browbeat whites. Faruqi IS from Pakistan, left Pakistan FOR Australia, swore allegiance to the Queen, holds office and privilege AS a Senator in the 'racist, thieving, colonising empire'. Calls the queen, to whom she lyingly swore allegiance, the leader of a racist, thieving empire on the day the queen dies. A disgraceful, insolent idiot who perjured herself - and it takes an idiot like you to rush to Faruqi's defence simply because she is Pakistani/tinted. I am not defending anyone Fwank....Pakistani, Aborigine and brown people have no problem attracting criticism....I could dispute Faruqi's comments without resorting to bullshit racist overtones unlike you and Hanson....You however are to racist and stupid to see anything but black versus white....You are a racist Fwank like Hanson....Why deny it??? :-? :-? :-?

Just so, old boy. Why deny it?

Are you or are you not a naughty old racist?

We'll settle the matter once and for all, shall we?

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2022 at 3:00pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 12:58pm: Frank wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 11:30am: U philperth2010 wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 10:15am: Frank wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 9:49am: philperth2010 wrote on Dec 23rd, 2022 at 9:06am: Ron wrote on Sep 28th, 2022 at 11:06am: Good on Pauline for telling Senator Mehreen Faruqi to "piss off back to Pakistan". We need more politicians with the guts to take these ungrateful immigrants to task. Another leftie that doesn't understand the meaning of the word" racism". If she wants to go on about human rights and racism she only has to look at her place of birth and the persecution of Christians by the Mussies. Senator Mehreen Faruqi was elected by the Australian people into the Australian senate just like Senator Hanson....Senator Hanson's personal attack on another Senator and all migrants was an insult to our democracy!!! ::) ::) ::) :D   :D Thank you, Bbwian. On the day of the Queen’s death, Faruqi tweeted: “I cannot mourn the leader of a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth of colonised peoples.” Hanson quote-tweeted that post to her own followers, replying: “Your attitude appalls and disgusts me. When you immigrated to Australia you took every advantage of this country. You took citizenship, bought multiple homes, and a job in a parliament. It’s clear you’re not happy, so pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan.” Far from insulting,  Hanson showed admirable restraint. Faruqi's utterance and the sentiments and black heart behind it are insolent and disgraceful. She is a perjurer like Livid Thorpe - took the oath but once in the job, broke it and disgraced herself. They should both resign. Pauline Hanson has a history of using racist overtones to appeal to her like minded followers who have an axe to grind against migrants and Aboriginal people....If you judge everyone by how long they have been in Australia, Aboriginal people have every right to tell Hanson to piss of back to where her ancestors came from....Hanson is a racist low life!!! :) :) :) Very stupid. Preening, pouting and very stupid. By your 'logic' no Pakistani, no Aborigine, no brown person can be countered about anything because they are tinted. Arguing with them or - the horror! - rejecting their views is racist. The 'racist'  shibboleth/stick exclusively reserved for the tinted to browbeat whites. Faruqi IS from Pakistan, left Pakistan FOR Australia, swore allegiance to the Queen, holds office and privilege AS a Senator in the 'racist, thieving, colonising empire'. Calls the queen, to whom she lyingly swore allegiance, the leader of a racist, thieving empire on the day the queen dies. A disgraceful, insolent idiot who perjured herself - and it takes an idiot like you to rush to Faruqi's defence simply because she is Pakistani/tinted. I am not defending anyone Fwank....Pakistani, Aborigine and brown people have no problem attracting criticism....I could dispute Faruqi's comments without resorting to bullshit racist overtones unlike you and Hanson....You however are to racist and stupid to see anything but black versus white....You are a racist Fwank like Hanson....Why deny it??? :-? :-? :-? Just so, old boy. Why deny it? Are you or are you not a naughty old racist? We'll settle the matter once and for all, shall we?

Oh, here's another trouser sniffing Pakistani to aid Poison Pill of Perf.


Btw, why is it racist to tell someone who migrated from another country to go back there if Australia is not to her liking despite the OBVIOUSLY HUGE improvement on her life the change to Australia has meant?

Would it be racist to tell an Irish Republican to go back to IRAland if Australia and the racist empire it is part of is so terrible? Of course not.  But for Bbwianesque numpties like you two, any mention of ANY country south of the Alps is WACIST. 

Well - if she hates the place so much she can just faruqi back home and see how she goes there....

---

Should've gone to SpickSavers.....

Never seen anyone thrown out of office so unceremoniously and work so hard to get their snout back in the troth.