Mattyfisk wrote on Nov 2
nd, 2019 at 3:02pm:
freediver wrote on Nov 2
nd, 2019 at 2:58pm:
They do not own it, any more than an elephant owns a zoo.
That's what I said. You're much more respectful, FD.
You think they don't own it because they're animals.
All part of our diverse native flora and fauna, no?
Why did you change it from apes to elephants?
They do not own it because they do not own it. They do not have private property rights over it. This is all by decree. The same people who are so eager to let them ban women and white people on account of their inferiority and inability to cope with modern society are hardly going to let them do whatever they want with it.
I did not manufacture this reality Karnal. I am just telling you what it is.
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 2
nd, 2019 at 3:13pm:
freediver wrote on Nov 2
nd, 2019 at 2:58pm:
They do not own it, any more than an elephant owns a zoo.
The courts determined otherwise, FD.
No they didn't. The whole private property moral equivalence is a desperate self delusion by politically correct racists who are afraid to consider the real reason why they think what they do. That is why the facts are irrelevant to you and why you keep repeating the same convenient lies.
Quote:Yes, but it's all about race for you, Homo, you acknowledge that.
If there is some other reason why you think Aborigines are inferior, please share. The only person who has actually admitted what they really think is master light, who explained that women should be banned from lakes and mountains because they are more open to demonic attack.