Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Judges issue racist verdict (Read 366 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 33302
I like fish
Judges issue racist verdict
Feb 26th, 2019 at 5:37pm
 
http://www.ozpolitic.com/index.html

The judges (members) in the Sonia Kruger case made racist claims in their deliberation, which they attributed to Andrew Bolt. Dr Robert Dubler SC and Anthea Elisabeth Lowe dismissed the claim that Kruger racially vilified Australian Muslims, on the grounds that Muslims are not a race. In consideration of their verdict, they explained:

Thereby, Ms Kruger goes further than Mr Andrew Bolt, who accepts in his article that “truly, the number of Muslims in the country does not tell the full story”. Mr Andrew Bolt points out that Germany, whilst having possibly more Muslims than France, may have escaped the same level of terrorism as France “perhaps because many of its Muslims came from Turkey, more westernised than the North African countries’’ which are the source of most Muslims in France.

The case was heard before the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales under the Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division and the Anti-Discrimination Act of 1977. The complaint was made by Sam Ekermawi, who regularly brings similar cases before the courts, including the Alan Jones case. He was served a bankruptcy notice in 2012.

The judges cleared Kruger of racial discrimination on the grounds that Islam is not a race, but criticised her for making an insufficiently 'measured' and 'reasonable' criticism, offering the racist theory from Bolt (who was convicted of racial vilification) as an example of a measured criticism.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 26th, 2019 at 6:44pm by freediver »  

Puns about communism aren't funny unless everyone gets them.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
xeej
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5161
Gender: male
Re: Judges issue racist verdict
Reply #1 - Feb 26th, 2019 at 6:39pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 26th, 2019 at 5:37pm:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/index.html

The judges (members) in the Sonia Kruger case made racist claims in their deliberation, which they attributed to Andrew Bolt. Dr Robert Dubler SC and Anthea Elisabeth Lowe dismissed the claim that Kruger racially vilified Australian Muslims, on the grounds that Muslims are not a race. In consideration of their verdict, they explained:

Thereby, Ms Kruger goes further than Mr Andrew Bolt, who accepts in his article that “truly, the number of Muslims in the country does not tell the full story”. Mr Andrew Bolt points out that Germany, whilst having possibly more Muslims than France, may have escaped the same level of terrorism as France “perhaps because many of its Muslims came from Turkey, more westernised than the North African countries’’ which are the source of most Muslims in France.

The case was heard before the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales under the Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division and the Anti-Discrimination Act of 1977. The complaint was made by Sam Ekermawi, who regularly brings similar cases before the courts, including the Alan Jones case. He was served a bankruptcy notice in 2012.

The judges cleared Kruger of racial discrimination on the grounds that Islam is not a race, but criticised her for making an insufficiently 'measured' and 'reasonable' criticism, offering the racist theory from Bolt (who was convicted of racial vilification) as an example of a measured criticism.

Its true, they are a breed.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Valkie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7031
Central Coast
Gender: male
Re: Judges issue racist verdict
Reply #2 - Feb 26th, 2019 at 7:15pm
 
xeej wrote on Feb 26th, 2019 at 6:39pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 26th, 2019 at 5:37pm:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/index.html

The judges (members) in the Sonia Kruger case made racist claims in their deliberation, which they attributed to Andrew Bolt. Dr Robert Dubler SC and Anthea Elisabeth Lowe dismissed the claim that Kruger racially vilified Australian Muslims, on the grounds that Muslims are not a race. In consideration of their verdict, they explained:

Thereby, Ms Kruger goes further than Mr Andrew Bolt, who accepts in his article that “truly, the number of Muslims in the country does not tell the full story”. Mr Andrew Bolt points out that Germany, whilst having possibly more Muslims than France, may have escaped the same level of terrorism as France “perhaps because many of its Muslims came from Turkey, more westernised than the North African countries’’ which are the source of most Muslims in France.

The case was heard before the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales under the Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division and the Anti-Discrimination Act of 1977. The complaint was made by Sam Ekermawi, who regularly brings similar cases before the courts, including the Alan Jones case. He was served a bankruptcy notice in 2012.

The judges cleared Kruger of racial discrimination on the grounds that Islam is not a race, but criticised her for making an insufficiently 'measured' and 'reasonable' criticism, offering the racist theory from Bolt (who was convicted of racial vilification) as an example of a measured criticism.

Its true, they are a breed.


More a disease

A plague

A filthy rotten infection that needs to be cleaned up with copious amounts of antiseptic.
Back to top
 

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU
 
IP Logged
 
xeej
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5161
Gender: male
Re: Judges issue racist verdict
Reply #3 - Feb 26th, 2019 at 7:53pm
 
Valkie wrote on Feb 26th, 2019 at 7:15pm:
xeej wrote on Feb 26th, 2019 at 6:39pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 26th, 2019 at 5:37pm:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/index.html

The judges (members) in the Sonia Kruger case made racist claims in their deliberation, which they attributed to Andrew Bolt. Dr Robert Dubler SC and Anthea Elisabeth Lowe dismissed the claim that Kruger racially vilified Australian Muslims, on the grounds that Muslims are not a race. In consideration of their verdict, they explained:

Thereby, Ms Kruger goes further than Mr Andrew Bolt, who accepts in his article that “truly, the number of Muslims in the country does not tell the full story”. Mr Andrew Bolt points out that Germany, whilst having possibly more Muslims than France, may have escaped the same level of terrorism as France “perhaps because many of its Muslims came from Turkey, more westernised than the North African countries’’ which are the source of most Muslims in France.

The case was heard before the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales under the Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division and the Anti-Discrimination Act of 1977. The complaint was made by Sam Ekermawi, who regularly brings similar cases before the courts, including the Alan Jones case. He was served a bankruptcy notice in 2012.

The judges cleared Kruger of racial discrimination on the grounds that Islam is not a race, but criticised her for making an insufficiently 'measured' and 'reasonable' criticism, offering the racist theory from Bolt (who was convicted of racial vilification) as an example of a measured criticism.

Its true, they are a breed.


More a disease

A plague

A filthy rotten infection that needs to be cleaned up with copious amounts of antiseptic.

Burn them.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
.JaSin.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11212
Inside your mind
Gender: male
Re: Judges issue racist verdict
Reply #4 - Feb 26th, 2019 at 10:05pm
 
I remember nearly getting into a punch-up with Moslems in Jervis Bay because they were just leaving their rubbish around (Aboriginal Land section).

I said
"Go back to Sydney where you belong!"


They then shouted
"That's Racist!"


Yep - total turdtards.  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Artificial Intelligence brought to you by ASIO.
 
IP Logged
 
Ye Grappler
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 41426
Mid-North Coast NSW
Gender: male
Re: Judges issue racist verdict
Reply #5 - Feb 27th, 2019 at 2:09pm
 
.JaSin. wrote on Feb 26th, 2019 at 10:05pm:
I remember nearly getting into a punch-up with Moslems in Jervis Bay because they were just leaving their rubbish around (Aboriginal Land section).

I said
"Go back to Sydney where you belong!"


They then shouted
"That's Racist!"


Yep - total turdtards.  Roll Eyes



Secred site, Bro - show some respec'... all prime oceanfront lend is secred site material... secret Aboriginal business... dat Jervis Bay headlan', Bro, shape like end of a dong, an' e' secred to male fertility....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
xeej
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5161
Gender: male
Re: Judges issue racist verdict
Reply #6 - Feb 27th, 2019 at 4:40pm
 
Ye Grappler wrote on Feb 27th, 2019 at 2:09pm:
.JaSin. wrote on Feb 26th, 2019 at 10:05pm:
I remember nearly getting into a punch-up with Moslems in Jervis Bay because they were just leaving their rubbish around (Aboriginal Land section).

I said
"Go back to Sydney where you belong!"


They then shouted
"That's Racist!"


Yep - total turdtards.  Roll Eyes



Secred site, Bro - show some respec'... all prime oceanfront lend is secred site material... secret Aboriginal business... dat Jervis Bay headlan', Bro, shape like end of a dong, an' e' secred to male fertility....

If I was a boong I would jump into my Toyota and go walkabout on all of my designated millions of acres with free beer. I would probably end up settling somewhere where the Dugongs and Turtle are plentiful.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print