Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print
Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim (Read 23973 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 146178
Gender: male
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #195 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:17pm
 
freediver wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 4:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 12:00pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 11:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:58am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:45pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:43pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:42pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
When you say "intellectually sympathise", does that mean using a verse instructing Muslims not to obey the infidel to paint Islam in a better light?


No, you're right, it does not.

Once again I have engage in double think: I believe that Islam is a threat to global freedom and democracy but I'm not willing to discriminate against Muslims in any form.


Would you say it is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy?


Yes, at this point in time, it is.


How so?



Because of its global reach and global impact.

What I will say though is that the far-right is rising and that could in the future pose global threat as well.


What do you think is actually going to happen, though?

How, for example, is Australia's democracy threatened?

Be specific.


Apologies for the delay.

An example would be a situation in which Muslims make up a majority of the population of Australia. When this will happen I cannot say for sure.

Let's assume that a significant minority of Muslims hold extremist views, which they do according to many polls. If 50% of the population become Muslim that means they would hold enough influence to form enough seats in Parliament to influence legislation - legislation preventing women from working, introducing polygamy, etc.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like democracy to me.



Way to miss the point Greg.

Do you agree that preventing women from working would be an example of how Islam is a threat to freedom, or is your understanding limited to blurting out idiocies like "that sounds like democracy"?


Without any help from Islam, here in Australia, Aboriginal people and women weren't permitted to vote.

Moreover, same sex marriage was not permitted, and homosexual acts were illegal.

Is that the sort of freedom you're talking about FD?

I'm curious.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51302
At my desk.
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #196 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:19pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:17pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 4:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 12:00pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 11:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:58am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:45pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:43pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:42pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
When you say "intellectually sympathise", does that mean using a verse instructing Muslims not to obey the infidel to paint Islam in a better light?


No, you're right, it does not.

Once again I have engage in double think: I believe that Islam is a threat to global freedom and democracy but I'm not willing to discriminate against Muslims in any form.


Would you say it is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy?


Yes, at this point in time, it is.


How so?



Because of its global reach and global impact.

What I will say though is that the far-right is rising and that could in the future pose global threat as well.


What do you think is actually going to happen, though?

How, for example, is Australia's democracy threatened?

Be specific.


Apologies for the delay.

An example would be a situation in which Muslims make up a majority of the population of Australia. When this will happen I cannot say for sure.

Let's assume that a significant minority of Muslims hold extremist views, which they do according to many polls. If 50% of the population become Muslim that means they would hold enough influence to form enough seats in Parliament to influence legislation - legislation preventing women from working, introducing polygamy, etc.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like democracy to me.



Way to miss the point Greg.

Do you agree that preventing women from working would be an example of how Islam is a threat to freedom, or is your understanding limited to blurting out idiocies like "that sounds like democracy"?


Without any help from Islam, here in Australia, Aboriginal people and women weren't permitted to vote.

Moreover, same sex marriage was not permitted, and homosexual acts were illegal.

Is that the sort of freedom you're talking about FD?

I'm curious.


Do you want us to bring freedom to the past as well Greg?

Can you give a straight answer to a simple question, or just change the topic?

Do you agree that preventing women from working would be an example of how Islam is a threat to freedom, or is your understanding limited to blurting out idiocies like "that sounds like democracy"?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 146178
Gender: male
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #197 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:21pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:11pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:59pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 4:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 12:00pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 11:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:58am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:45pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:43pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:42pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
When you say "intellectually sympathise", does that mean using a verse instructing Muslims not to obey the infidel to paint Islam in a better light?


No, you're right, it does not.

Once again I have engage in double think: I believe that Islam is a threat to global freedom and democracy but I'm not willing to discriminate against Muslims in any form.


Would you say it is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy?


Yes, at this point in time, it is.


How so?



Because of its global reach and global impact.

What I will say though is that the far-right is rising and that could in the future pose global threat as well.


What do you think is actually going to happen, though?

How, for example, is Australia's democracy threatened?

Be specific.


Apologies for the delay.

An example would be a situation in which Muslims make up a majority of the population of Australia. When this will happen I cannot say for sure.

Let's assume that a significant minority of Muslims hold extremist views, which they do according to many polls. If 50% of the population become Muslim that means they would hold enough influence to form enough seats in Parliament to influence legislation - legislation preventing women from working, introducing polygamy, etc.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like democracy to me.



Indeed it would be democracy. As history has shown us, civilizations go through periods of enlightenment and decadence; for i.e. the Greek civilization was at its high point during the period prior to Alexander the Great. After Alexander died, the integration of foreign peoples into his various kingdoms led to a period of decadence - the Greek language became less sophisticated, adapting to the local linguistical structures of the local cultures, etc.

Now here's the question: if the democracy you referred to led to a period of decadence in Australian society, would you be all right with that on your deathbed?


By "decadence", I assume you mean a general decline (leaving out the excessive indulgence in pleasure and luxury).

My question to you is, don't you think we're going through a period of decline right now?

If we choose to accept what democracy gives us today, we have to accept what it will bring tomorrow.




I think Western civilization is going through a period of decline.

So, my question: would you be happy to accept decriminalization of wife-beating if the democracy majority supported it? If it were the will of the people.


I wouldn't be happy, but I'd have to accept it.

I'm not happy with hundreds of laws in this country at the moment, that have absolutely nothing to do with Islam, but I have to accept them.

I'm not happy with the democratically elected government in this country, but I have to accept it.

The alternative is anarchy.





Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #198 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:21pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:17pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 4:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 12:00pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 11:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:58am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:45pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:43pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:42pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
When you say "intellectually sympathise", does that mean using a verse instructing Muslims not to obey the infidel to paint Islam in a better light?


No, you're right, it does not.

Once again I have engage in double think: I believe that Islam is a threat to global freedom and democracy but I'm not willing to discriminate against Muslims in any form.


Would you say it is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy?


Yes, at this point in time, it is.


How so?



Because of its global reach and global impact.

What I will say though is that the far-right is rising and that could in the future pose global threat as well.


What do you think is actually going to happen, though?

How, for example, is Australia's democracy threatened?

Be specific.


Apologies for the delay.

An example would be a situation in which Muslims make up a majority of the population of Australia. When this will happen I cannot say for sure.

Let's assume that a significant minority of Muslims hold extremist views, which they do according to many polls. If 50% of the population become Muslim that means they would hold enough influence to form enough seats in Parliament to influence legislation - legislation preventing women from working, introducing polygamy, etc.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like democracy to me.



Way to miss the point Greg.

Do you agree that preventing women from working would be an example of how Islam is a threat to freedom, or is your understanding limited to blurting out idiocies like "that sounds like democracy"?


Without any help from Islam, here in Australia, Aboriginal people and women weren't permitted to vote.

Moreover, same sex marriage was not permitted, and homosexual acts were illegal.

Is that the sort of freedom you're talking about FD?

I'm curious.


But they are now, aren't they? Under an Islamic state, women wouldn't be allowed to vote, and homosexuals would be jailed.

Would you support the evolution of Australian society toward such decadence?
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #199 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:23pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:21pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:11pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:59pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 4:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 12:00pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 11:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:58am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:45pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:43pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:42pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
When you say "intellectually sympathise", does that mean using a verse instructing Muslims not to obey the infidel to paint Islam in a better light?


No, you're right, it does not.

Once again I have engage in double think: I believe that Islam is a threat to global freedom and democracy but I'm not willing to discriminate against Muslims in any form.


Would you say it is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy?


Yes, at this point in time, it is.


How so?



Because of its global reach and global impact.

What I will say though is that the far-right is rising and that could in the future pose global threat as well.


What do you think is actually going to happen, though?

How, for example, is Australia's democracy threatened?

Be specific.


Apologies for the delay.

An example would be a situation in which Muslims make up a majority of the population of Australia. When this will happen I cannot say for sure.

Let's assume that a significant minority of Muslims hold extremist views, which they do according to many polls. If 50% of the population become Muslim that means they would hold enough influence to form enough seats in Parliament to influence legislation - legislation preventing women from working, introducing polygamy, etc.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like democracy to me.



Indeed it would be democracy. As history has shown us, civilizations go through periods of enlightenment and decadence; for i.e. the Greek civilization was at its high point during the period prior to Alexander the Great. After Alexander died, the integration of foreign peoples into his various kingdoms led to a period of decadence - the Greek language became less sophisticated, adapting to the local linguistical structures of the local cultures, etc.

Now here's the question: if the democracy you referred to led to a period of decadence in Australian society, would you be all right with that on your deathbed?


By "decadence", I assume you mean a general decline (leaving out the excessive indulgence in pleasure and luxury).

My question to you is, don't you think we're going through a period of decline right now?

If we choose to accept what democracy gives us today, we have to accept what it will bring tomorrow.




I think Western civilization is going through a period of decline.

So, my question: would you be happy to accept decriminalization of wife-beating if the democracy majority supported it? If it were the will of the people.


I wouldn't be happy, but I'd have to accept it.

I'm not happy with hundreds of laws in this country at the moment, that have absolutely nothing to do with Islam, but I have to accept them.

I'm not happy with the democratically elected government in this country, but I have to accept it.

The alternative is anarchy.







False equivalence: the supposed laws you dislike have no equivalence to the decriminalization of wife-beating or repeal the women's vote.

Try again.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 146178
Gender: male
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #200 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:24pm
 
freediver wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:17pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 4:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 12:00pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 11:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:58am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:45pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:43pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:42pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
When you say "intellectually sympathise", does that mean using a verse instructing Muslims not to obey the infidel to paint Islam in a better light?


No, you're right, it does not.

Once again I have engage in double think: I believe that Islam is a threat to global freedom and democracy but I'm not willing to discriminate against Muslims in any form.


Would you say it is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy?


Yes, at this point in time, it is.


How so?



Because of its global reach and global impact.

What I will say though is that the far-right is rising and that could in the future pose global threat as well.


What do you think is actually going to happen, though?

How, for example, is Australia's democracy threatened?

Be specific.


Apologies for the delay.

An example would be a situation in which Muslims make up a majority of the population of Australia. When this will happen I cannot say for sure.

Let's assume that a significant minority of Muslims hold extremist views, which they do according to many polls. If 50% of the population become Muslim that means they would hold enough influence to form enough seats in Parliament to influence legislation - legislation preventing women from working, introducing polygamy, etc.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like democracy to me.



Way to miss the point Greg.

Do you agree that preventing women from working would be an example of how Islam is a threat to freedom, or is your understanding limited to blurting out idiocies like "that sounds like democracy"?


Without any help from Islam, here in Australia, Aboriginal people and women weren't permitted to vote.

Moreover, same sex marriage was not permitted, and homosexual acts were illegal.

Is that the sort of freedom you're talking about FD?

I'm curious.


Do you want us to bring freedom to the past as well Greg?

Can you give a straight answer to a simple question, or just change the topic?

Do you agree that preventing women from working would be an example of how Islam is a threat to freedom, or is your understanding limited to blurting out idiocies like "that sounds like democracy"?


Way to miss the point, FD.

As always.

I'm demonstrating to you that we don't need Islam in this country in order to restrict people's freedoms.

We've been doing it for the last few hundred years without any help from Muslims.

It seems that you, along with Auggie, only like democracy when it gives the results that you want.

There are millions of people TODAY whose freedoms are under threat because of the current democratically elected government's policies.

However, you choose to ignore that fact because your mission in "life" is to demonise Muslims.

Am I right, FD?

I'm curious.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 146178
Gender: male
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #201 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:26pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:23pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:21pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:11pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:59pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 4:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 12:00pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 11:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:58am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:45pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:43pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:42pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
When you say "intellectually sympathise", does that mean using a verse instructing Muslims not to obey the infidel to paint Islam in a better light?


No, you're right, it does not.

Once again I have engage in double think: I believe that Islam is a threat to global freedom and democracy but I'm not willing to discriminate against Muslims in any form.


Would you say it is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy?


Yes, at this point in time, it is.


How so?



Because of its global reach and global impact.

What I will say though is that the far-right is rising and that could in the future pose global threat as well.


What do you think is actually going to happen, though?

How, for example, is Australia's democracy threatened?

Be specific.


Apologies for the delay.

An example would be a situation in which Muslims make up a majority of the population of Australia. When this will happen I cannot say for sure.

Let's assume that a significant minority of Muslims hold extremist views, which they do according to many polls. If 50% of the population become Muslim that means they would hold enough influence to form enough seats in Parliament to influence legislation - legislation preventing women from working, introducing polygamy, etc.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like democracy to me.



Indeed it would be democracy. As history has shown us, civilizations go through periods of enlightenment and decadence; for i.e. the Greek civilization was at its high point during the period prior to Alexander the Great. After Alexander died, the integration of foreign peoples into his various kingdoms led to a period of decadence - the Greek language became less sophisticated, adapting to the local linguistical structures of the local cultures, etc.

Now here's the question: if the democracy you referred to led to a period of decadence in Australian society, would you be all right with that on your deathbed?


By "decadence", I assume you mean a general decline (leaving out the excessive indulgence in pleasure and luxury).

My question to you is, don't you think we're going through a period of decline right now?

If we choose to accept what democracy gives us today, we have to accept what it will bring tomorrow.




I think Western civilization is going through a period of decline.

So, my question: would you be happy to accept decriminalization of wife-beating if the democracy majority supported it? If it were the will of the people.


I wouldn't be happy, but I'd have to accept it.

I'm not happy with hundreds of laws in this country at the moment, that have absolutely nothing to do with Islam, but I have to accept them.

I'm not happy with the democratically elected government in this country, but I have to accept it.

The alternative is anarchy.







False equivalence: the supposed laws you dislike have no equivalence to the decriminalization of wife-beating or repeal the women's vote.

Try again.


Sorry Auggie, you've lost this one.

You're done.

You either accept democracy, or you don't.

You can't have it your way all the time.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #202 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:27pm
 
Can you explain what freedoms are under threat from our democratically-elected government?
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 146178
Gender: male
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #203 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:29pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:27pm:
Can you explain what freedoms are under threat from our democratically-elected government?


Valkie's freedom to drive his car at 250kph down the freeway.

There will always be laws that some people don't agree with.

You don't seem to understand that.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #204 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:29pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:26pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:23pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:21pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:11pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:59pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 4:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 12:00pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 11:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:58am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:45pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:43pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:42pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
When you say "intellectually sympathise", does that mean using a verse instructing Muslims not to obey the infidel to paint Islam in a better light?


No, you're right, it does not.

Once again I have engage in double think: I believe that Islam is a threat to global freedom and democracy but I'm not willing to discriminate against Muslims in any form.


Would you say it is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy?


Yes, at this point in time, it is.


How so?



Because of its global reach and global impact.

What I will say though is that the far-right is rising and that could in the future pose global threat as well.


What do you think is actually going to happen, though?

How, for example, is Australia's democracy threatened?

Be specific.


Apologies for the delay.

An example would be a situation in which Muslims make up a majority of the population of Australia. When this will happen I cannot say for sure.

Let's assume that a significant minority of Muslims hold extremist views, which they do according to many polls. If 50% of the population become Muslim that means they would hold enough influence to form enough seats in Parliament to influence legislation - legislation preventing women from working, introducing polygamy, etc.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like democracy to me.



Indeed it would be democracy. As history has shown us, civilizations go through periods of enlightenment and decadence; for i.e. the Greek civilization was at its high point during the period prior to Alexander the Great. After Alexander died, the integration of foreign peoples into his various kingdoms led to a period of decadence - the Greek language became less sophisticated, adapting to the local linguistical structures of the local cultures, etc.

Now here's the question: if the democracy you referred to led to a period of decadence in Australian society, would you be all right with that on your deathbed?


By "decadence", I assume you mean a general decline (leaving out the excessive indulgence in pleasure and luxury).

My question to you is, don't you think we're going through a period of decline right now?

If we choose to accept what democracy gives us today, we have to accept what it will bring tomorrow.




I think Western civilization is going through a period of decline.

So, my question: would you be happy to accept decriminalization of wife-beating if the democracy majority supported it? If it were the will of the people.


I wouldn't be happy, but I'd have to accept it.

I'm not happy with hundreds of laws in this country at the moment, that have absolutely nothing to do with Islam, but I have to accept them.

I'm not happy with the democratically elected government in this country, but I have to accept it.

The alternative is anarchy.







False equivalence: the supposed laws you dislike have no equivalence to the decriminalization of wife-beating or repeal the women's vote.

Try again.


Sorry Auggie, you've lost this one.

You're done.

You either accept democracy, or you don't.

You can't have it your way all the time.



I would never support the decriminalization of wife-beating even if 99% of population voted in favour of it.

I believe the government should defend the rights of even the lowest among us, even at the point of the bayonet.

If the Government of Queensland decided to intern Muslims under the leadership of Yadda, I would have no qualms about sending in the army to prevent that happening.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 146178
Gender: male
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #205 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:31pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:29pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:26pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:23pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:21pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:11pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:59pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 4:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 12:00pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 11:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:58am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:45pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:43pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:42pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
When you say "intellectually sympathise", does that mean using a verse instructing Muslims not to obey the infidel to paint Islam in a better light?


No, you're right, it does not.

Once again I have engage in double think: I believe that Islam is a threat to global freedom and democracy but I'm not willing to discriminate against Muslims in any form.


Would you say it is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy?


Yes, at this point in time, it is.


How so?



Because of its global reach and global impact.

What I will say though is that the far-right is rising and that could in the future pose global threat as well.


What do you think is actually going to happen, though?

How, for example, is Australia's democracy threatened?

Be specific.


Apologies for the delay.

An example would be a situation in which Muslims make up a majority of the population of Australia. When this will happen I cannot say for sure.

Let's assume that a significant minority of Muslims hold extremist views, which they do according to many polls. If 50% of the population become Muslim that means they would hold enough influence to form enough seats in Parliament to influence legislation - legislation preventing women from working, introducing polygamy, etc.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like democracy to me.



Indeed it would be democracy. As history has shown us, civilizations go through periods of enlightenment and decadence; for i.e. the Greek civilization was at its high point during the period prior to Alexander the Great. After Alexander died, the integration of foreign peoples into his various kingdoms led to a period of decadence - the Greek language became less sophisticated, adapting to the local linguistical structures of the local cultures, etc.

Now here's the question: if the democracy you referred to led to a period of decadence in Australian society, would you be all right with that on your deathbed?


By "decadence", I assume you mean a general decline (leaving out the excessive indulgence in pleasure and luxury).

My question to you is, don't you think we're going through a period of decline right now?

If we choose to accept what democracy gives us today, we have to accept what it will bring tomorrow.




I think Western civilization is going through a period of decline.

So, my question: would you be happy to accept decriminalization of wife-beating if the democracy majority supported it? If it were the will of the people.


I wouldn't be happy, but I'd have to accept it.

I'm not happy with hundreds of laws in this country at the moment, that have absolutely nothing to do with Islam, but I have to accept them.

I'm not happy with the democratically elected government in this country, but I have to accept it.

The alternative is anarchy.







False equivalence: the supposed laws you dislike have no equivalence to the decriminalization of wife-beating or repeal the women's vote.

Try again.


Sorry Auggie, you've lost this one.

You're done.

You either accept democracy, or you don't.

You can't have it your way all the time.



I would never support the decriminalization of wife-beating even if 99% of population voted in favour of it.

I believe the government should defend the rights of even the lowest among us, even at the point of the bayonet.

If the Government of Queensland decided to intern Muslims under the leadership of Yadda, I would have no qualms about sending in the army to prevent that happening.


Neither would I.

Just as I don't support a hundred different laws in force today.

What do you suggest I do about it, Auggie?

I'm curious.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #206 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:35pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:31pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:29pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:26pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:23pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:21pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:11pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:59pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 4:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 12:00pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 11:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:58am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:45pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:43pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:42pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
When you say "intellectually sympathise", does that mean using a verse instructing Muslims not to obey the infidel to paint Islam in a better light?


No, you're right, it does not.

Once again I have engage in double think: I believe that Islam is a threat to global freedom and democracy but I'm not willing to discriminate against Muslims in any form.


Would you say it is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy?


Yes, at this point in time, it is.


How so?



Because of its global reach and global impact.

What I will say though is that the far-right is rising and that could in the future pose global threat as well.


What do you think is actually going to happen, though?

How, for example, is Australia's democracy threatened?

Be specific.


Apologies for the delay.

An example would be a situation in which Muslims make up a majority of the population of Australia. When this will happen I cannot say for sure.

Let's assume that a significant minority of Muslims hold extremist views, which they do according to many polls. If 50% of the population become Muslim that means they would hold enough influence to form enough seats in Parliament to influence legislation - legislation preventing women from working, introducing polygamy, etc.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like democracy to me.



Indeed it would be democracy. As history has shown us, civilizations go through periods of enlightenment and decadence; for i.e. the Greek civilization was at its high point during the period prior to Alexander the Great. After Alexander died, the integration of foreign peoples into his various kingdoms led to a period of decadence - the Greek language became less sophisticated, adapting to the local linguistical structures of the local cultures, etc.

Now here's the question: if the democracy you referred to led to a period of decadence in Australian society, would you be all right with that on your deathbed?


By "decadence", I assume you mean a general decline (leaving out the excessive indulgence in pleasure and luxury).

My question to you is, don't you think we're going through a period of decline right now?

If we choose to accept what democracy gives us today, we have to accept what it will bring tomorrow.




I think Western civilization is going through a period of decline.

So, my question: would you be happy to accept decriminalization of wife-beating if the democracy majority supported it? If it were the will of the people.


I wouldn't be happy, but I'd have to accept it.

I'm not happy with hundreds of laws in this country at the moment, that have absolutely nothing to do with Islam, but I have to accept them.

I'm not happy with the democratically elected government in this country, but I have to accept it.

The alternative is anarchy.







False equivalence: the supposed laws you dislike have no equivalence to the decriminalization of wife-beating or repeal the women's vote.

Try again.


Sorry Auggie, you've lost this one.

You're done.

You either accept democracy, or you don't.

You can't have it your way all the time.



I would never support the decriminalization of wife-beating even if 99% of population voted in favour of it.

I believe the government should defend the rights of even the lowest among us, even at the point of the bayonet.

If the Government of Queensland decided to intern Muslims under the leadership of Yadda, I would have no qualms about sending in the army to prevent that happening.


Neither would I.

Just as I don't support a hundred different laws in force today.

What do you suggest I do about it, Auggie?

I'm curious.


We're talking about civil rights here, not some law which you disagree with.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51302
At my desk.
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #207 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 7:01pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:24pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:17pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 4:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 12:00pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 11:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:58am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:45pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:43pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:42pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
When you say "intellectually sympathise", does that mean using a verse instructing Muslims not to obey the infidel to paint Islam in a better light?


No, you're right, it does not.

Once again I have engage in double think: I believe that Islam is a threat to global freedom and democracy but I'm not willing to discriminate against Muslims in any form.


Would you say it is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy?


Yes, at this point in time, it is.


How so?



Because of its global reach and global impact.

What I will say though is that the far-right is rising and that could in the future pose global threat as well.


What do you think is actually going to happen, though?

How, for example, is Australia's democracy threatened?

Be specific.


Apologies for the delay.

An example would be a situation in which Muslims make up a majority of the population of Australia. When this will happen I cannot say for sure.

Let's assume that a significant minority of Muslims hold extremist views, which they do according to many polls. If 50% of the population become Muslim that means they would hold enough influence to form enough seats in Parliament to influence legislation - legislation preventing women from working, introducing polygamy, etc.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like democracy to me.



Way to miss the point Greg.

Do you agree that preventing women from working would be an example of how Islam is a threat to freedom, or is your understanding limited to blurting out idiocies like "that sounds like democracy"?


Without any help from Islam, here in Australia, Aboriginal people and women weren't permitted to vote.

Moreover, same sex marriage was not permitted, and homosexual acts were illegal.

Is that the sort of freedom you're talking about FD?

I'm curious.


Do you want us to bring freedom to the past as well Greg?

Can you give a straight answer to a simple question, or just change the topic?

Do you agree that preventing women from working would be an example of how Islam is a threat to freedom, or is your understanding limited to blurting out idiocies like "that sounds like democracy"?


Way to miss the point, FD.

As always.

I'm demonstrating to you that we don't need Islam in this country in order to restrict people's freedoms.

We've been doing it for the last few hundred years without any help from Muslims.

It seems that you, along with Auggie, only like democracy when it gives the results that you want.

There are millions of people TODAY whose freedoms are under threat because of the current democratically elected government's policies.

However, you choose to ignore that fact because your mission in "life" is to demonise Muslims.

Am I right, FD?

I'm curious.


You got it backwards. Women did not have the vote before. They do now. Homosexuality was illegal. It is legal now. This is liberalisation Greg. It has been going on for centuries.

You'll find that the countries where democratically elected governments are the biggest risk to the freedom of their citizens also happen to be the ones with a majority muslim population.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 146178
Gender: male
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #208 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 8:25pm
 
freediver wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 7:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:24pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:17pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 4:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 12:00pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 11:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:58am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:45pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:43pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:42pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
When you say "intellectually sympathise", does that mean using a verse instructing Muslims not to obey the infidel to paint Islam in a better light?


No, you're right, it does not.

Once again I have engage in double think: I believe that Islam is a threat to global freedom and democracy but I'm not willing to discriminate against Muslims in any form.


Would you say it is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy?


Yes, at this point in time, it is.


How so?



Because of its global reach and global impact.

What I will say though is that the far-right is rising and that could in the future pose global threat as well.


What do you think is actually going to happen, though?

How, for example, is Australia's democracy threatened?

Be specific.


Apologies for the delay.

An example would be a situation in which Muslims make up a majority of the population of Australia. When this will happen I cannot say for sure.

Let's assume that a significant minority of Muslims hold extremist views, which they do according to many polls. If 50% of the population become Muslim that means they would hold enough influence to form enough seats in Parliament to influence legislation - legislation preventing women from working, introducing polygamy, etc.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like democracy to me.



Way to miss the point Greg.

Do you agree that preventing women from working would be an example of how Islam is a threat to freedom, or is your understanding limited to blurting out idiocies like "that sounds like democracy"?


Without any help from Islam, here in Australia, Aboriginal people and women weren't permitted to vote.

Moreover, same sex marriage was not permitted, and homosexual acts were illegal.

Is that the sort of freedom you're talking about FD?

I'm curious.


Do you want us to bring freedom to the past as well Greg?

Can you give a straight answer to a simple question, or just change the topic?

Do you agree that preventing women from working would be an example of how Islam is a threat to freedom, or is your understanding limited to blurting out idiocies like "that sounds like democracy"?


Way to miss the point, FD.

As always.

I'm demonstrating to you that we don't need Islam in this country in order to restrict people's freedoms.

We've been doing it for the last few hundred years without any help from Muslims.

It seems that you, along with Auggie, only like democracy when it gives the results that you want.

There are millions of people TODAY whose freedoms are under threat because of the current democratically elected government's policies.

However, you choose to ignore that fact because your mission in "life" is to demonise Muslims.

Am I right, FD?

I'm curious.


You got it backwards. Women did not have the vote before. They do now. Homosexuality was illegal. It is legal now. This is liberalisation Greg. It has been going on for centuries.

You'll find that the countries where democratically elected governments are the biggest risk to the freedom of their citizens also happen to be the ones with a majority muslim population.


Ah.  I see.

And was that because of Islam, or was it because of old, white, predominantly Christian, Australian men?

I'm curious.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52938
Gender: male
Re: Don't kid yourself Ahmadi moslems are not 'victim
Reply #209 - Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:04pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 8:25pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 7:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:24pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:17pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 6:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 5:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 4:01pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 12:00pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 11:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2018 at 9:58am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:45pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:43pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:42pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 13th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
When you say "intellectually sympathise", does that mean using a verse instructing Muslims not to obey the infidel to paint Islam in a better light?


No, you're right, it does not.

Once again I have engage in double think: I believe that Islam is a threat to global freedom and democracy but I'm not willing to discriminate against Muslims in any form.


Would you say it is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy?


Yes, at this point in time, it is.


How so?



Because of its global reach and global impact.

What I will say though is that the far-right is rising and that could in the future pose global threat as well.


What do you think is actually going to happen, though?

How, for example, is Australia's democracy threatened?

Be specific.


Apologies for the delay.

An example would be a situation in which Muslims make up a majority of the population of Australia. When this will happen I cannot say for sure.

Let's assume that a significant minority of Muslims hold extremist views, which they do according to many polls. If 50% of the population become Muslim that means they would hold enough influence to form enough seats in Parliament to influence legislation - legislation preventing women from working, introducing polygamy, etc.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds like democracy to me.



Way to miss the point Greg.

Do you agree that preventing women from working would be an example of how Islam is a threat to freedom, or is your understanding limited to blurting out idiocies like "that sounds like democracy"?


Without any help from Islam, here in Australia, Aboriginal people and women weren't permitted to vote.

Moreover, same sex marriage was not permitted, and homosexual acts were illegal.

Is that the sort of freedom you're talking about FD?

I'm curious.


Do you want us to bring freedom to the past as well Greg?

Can you give a straight answer to a simple question, or just change the topic?

Do you agree that preventing women from working would be an example of how Islam is a threat to freedom, or is your understanding limited to blurting out idiocies like "that sounds like democracy"?


Way to miss the point, FD.

As always.

I'm demonstrating to you that we don't need Islam in this country in order to restrict people's freedoms.

We've been doing it for the last few hundred years without any help from Muslims.

It seems that you, along with Auggie, only like democracy when it gives the results that you want.

There are millions of people TODAY whose freedoms are under threat because of the current democratically elected government's policies.

However, you choose to ignore that fact because your mission in "life" is to demonise Muslims.

Am I right, FD?

I'm curious.


You got it backwards. Women did not have the vote before. They do now. Homosexuality was illegal. It is legal now. This is liberalisation Greg. It has been going on for centuries.

You'll find that the countries where democratically elected governments are the biggest risk to the freedom of their citizens also happen to be the ones with a majority muslim population.


Ah.  I see.

And was that because of Islam, or was it because of old, white, predominantly Christian, Australian men?

I'm curious.

In Islam women are still worth half a man and the homos are thrown off tall buildings to please Allah.


You are not curious, turd, you are a flaming idiot, like your dad, Bwian. Or is she your mum? Aunt? Sis?








Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print