Australian Politics Forum - aggressive left sacks those voting NO

Bam

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #30 - Sep 19^th, 2017 at 9:13pm

Quote:

A SMALL-BUSINESS owner has sacked a staff member who came out in support of the “no” campaign in the same-sex marriage postal plebiscite.

This kind of conduct is not exclusive to one side of the debate.

Church cancels wedding because bride and groom supported gay marriage on Facebook

This sort of conduct is not acceptable, no matter which side perpetuates it. Do we really want to live in an Australia where expressing political views brings this kind of "punishment"? Of course not.

People on BOTH sides of the discussion should be allowed to express their views freely, and people on both sides also have the responsibility to refrain from attacking others with different views by word or deed.

Do you want to live in an Australia where all people are equal before the law? Choose Yes.
Do you have legitimate concerns on religious grounds? Choose No.

I have chosen Yes, by the way, but I'm otherwise not wasting my time on this distraction. And that is what it is - a distraction, to divert the attention of the public from the continuing ineptitude of this bad government.

Back to top

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.

IP Logged

Auggie

Gold Member

Offline

The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #31 - Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:10pm

Grendel wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 8:35pm:

YOU HAVE TO BE KIDDING.

UNFAIR DISMISSAL AND ALL SORTS OF LEGAL SHYTE NEEDS TO BE TOSSED AT THIS TWERP

This is the sort of demented mindset that No voters have to face. Roll Eyes

G, you would be well within your right to fire an employee if they insulted Jesus.

It goes both ways you know.

Back to top

The Progressive President

IP Logged

Auggie

Gold Member

Offline

The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #32 - Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:11pm

Bam wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 9:13pm:

Quote:

A SMALL-BUSINESS owner has sacked a staff member who came out in support of the “no” campaign in the same-sex marriage postal plebiscite.

This kind of conduct is not exclusive to one side of the debate.

Church cancels wedding because bride and groom supported gay marriage on Facebook

This sort of conduct is not acceptable, no matter which side perpetuates it. Do we really want to live in an Australia where expressing political views brings this kind of "punishment"? Of course not.

People on BOTH sides of the discussion should be allowed to express their views freely, and people on both sides also have the responsibility to refrain from attacking others with different views by word or deed.

Do you want to live in an Australia where all people are equal before the law? Choose Yes.
Do you have legitimate concerns on religious grounds? Choose No.

I have chosen Yes, by the way, but I'm otherwise not wasting my time on this distraction. And that is what it is - a distraction, to divert the attention of the public from the continuing ineptitude of this bad government.

Church has the right to cancel the wedding. If they don't want to marry the couple, they shouldn't be forced to.

Back to top

The Progressive President

IP Logged

Bam

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #33 - Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:39pm

Auggie wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:11pm:

Bam wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 9:13pm:

Quote:

A SMALL-BUSINESS owner has sacked a staff member who came out in support of the “no” campaign in the same-sex marriage postal plebiscite.

This kind of conduct is not exclusive to one side of the debate.

Church cancels wedding because bride and groom supported gay marriage on Facebook

This sort of conduct is not acceptable, no matter which side perpetuates it. Do we really want to live in an Australia where expressing political views brings this kind of "punishment"? Of course not.

People on BOTH sides of the discussion should be allowed to express their views freely, and people on both sides also have the responsibility to refrain from attacking others with different views by word or deed.

Do you want to live in an Australia where all people are equal before the law? Choose Yes.
Do you have legitimate concerns on religious grounds? Choose No.

I have chosen Yes, by the way, but I'm otherwise not wasting my time on this distraction. And that is what it is - a distraction, to divert the attention of the public from the continuing ineptitude of this bad government.

Church has the right to cancel the wedding. If they don't want to marry the couple, they shouldn't be forced to.

As long as they are willing to bear the cost of any litigation and damages. If the couple are forced to pay additional costs, it's likely they will be sending the church the bill.

Back to top

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.

IP Logged

matty Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 11055 East Sydney Gender:	Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO Reply #34 - Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:44pm Sorry Sprint, I posted a thread and hadn't seen this yet. Strange how the left support this but apparently are the ones who wanted fairer workplace conditions. Clearly only when it suits, it is okay to unfairly dismiss a conservative.
Back to top	BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!! IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #35 - Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:47pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:57pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:55pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

Again, the no campaign reaching for any issue other than the one we're actually voting on.

So?

If the left keep attacking people it won't change their mind it will merely harden their resolve.

It happens everyone some d1ckhead socialist wants to change something

Good luck with the yes campaign. Grin

Why arent these people just focusing on what the question is about?

The initial post had nothing to do with gay marriage and was about unfair dismissal. You made it about marriage so perhaps heed your own advice when talking about focusing on what the question is about.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #36 - Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:48pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 2:04pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 2:01pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:57pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:55pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

Again, the no campaign reaching for any issue other than the one we're actually voting on.

So?

If the left keep attacking people it won't change their mind it will merely harden their resolve.

It happens everyone some d1ckhead socialist wants to change something

Good luck with the yes campaign. Grin

Why arent these people just focusing on what the question is about?

Because it is a stupid waste of time and needs to be ignored.

Then just vote no and stop banging on about the following

1. It will lead to paedophilia
2. It will lead to transsexuals raping women in toilets
3. It will lead to people marrying their dogs
4. The children of gay couples ar ethe new stolen generation
5. Its about political correctness
6. Safe Schools

All of that could happen and more. It is a Pandora's box. But why don't we focus on the topic of issue here, unfair dismissal.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #37 - Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:50pm

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 2:12pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:58pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:57pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:55pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

Again, the no campaign reaching for any issue other than the one we're actually voting on.

So?

If the left keep attacking people it won't change their mind it will merely harden their resolve.

It happens everyone some d1ckhead socialist wants to change something

Good luck with the yes campaign. Grin

Why arent these people just focusing on what the question is about?

Why wasn't the business owner who sacked that girl?

'cause the girl made a public statement which she associated with the business, against the owner's wishes?

Tell me, Grappler, how long do you put up with employees going against your wishes and placing your business in a precarious position with a largish slice of the community? Roll Eyes

The girl's post had nothing whatsoever to do with the business. She posted I think on her own personal Facebook account.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #38 - Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:51pm

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 2:23pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 2:18pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 2:13pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 2:04pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 2:01pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:57pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:55pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

Again, the no campaign reaching for any issue other than the one we're actually voting on.

So?

If the left keep attacking people it won't change their mind it will merely harden their resolve.

It happens everyone some d1ckhead socialist wants to change something

Good luck with the yes campaign. Grin

Why arent these people just focusing on what the question is about?

Because it is a stupid waste of time and needs to be ignored.

Then just vote no and stop banging on about the following

1. It will lead to paedophilia
2. It will lead to transsexuals raping women in toilets
3. It will lead to people marrying their dogs
4. The children of gay couples ar ethe new stolen generation
5. Its about political correctness
6. Safe Schools

I have never said any of that ya fkkhead, you're just confused and stupid. Grin

I couldn't care less about how the homos are feeling, or what they want. I just hate fkkheaed socialists demanding everyone agree with everything they say and think.

I was talking about the no campaign in general. So if you dont care about homosexuals want, just vote yes and get the argument over with.,

Well first up I don't generally vote, unless I think it is important and this isn't.

Secondly it would be funny as fkk to see the socialist lose their sh1t if they lose. Grin

Fortunately we saw that last November and boy o boy was it orgasmic.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #39 - Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:55pm

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 7:24pm:

Fuzzball wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 7:16pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 6:57pm:

So the right are worried about cake makers and religious institutions not being able to discriminate based on their beliefs and then they criticise someone who sacks someone based on their beliefs....Go figure....I thought this is what you wanted???

Roll Eyes

Now that really is a load of cr@p Phyllis....

If its ok for a baker to refuse to bake a cake for someone based on their beliefs why is it not ok to terminate a contract based on your beliefs....If a pastor can withdraw his services because he opposes the opinions of his client why cant a business sack someone who for the same thing???

Huh

Because you go to a baker and a priest to get food and get married, respectively. They are optional services. When you are an employee or contractor you have signed mutually agreed terms and conditions of employment, which are legal.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #40 - Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:56pm

Bam wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 9:13pm:

Quote:

A SMALL-BUSINESS owner has sacked a staff member who came out in support of the “no” campaign in the same-sex marriage postal plebiscite.

This kind of conduct is not exclusive to one side of the debate.

Church cancels wedding because bride and groom supported gay marriage on Facebook

This sort of conduct is not acceptable, no matter which side perpetuates it. Do we really want to live in an Australia where expressing political views brings this kind of "punishment"? Of course not.

People on BOTH sides of the discussion should be allowed to express their views freely, and people on both sides also have the responsibility to refrain from attacking others with different views by word or deed.

Do you want to live in an Australia where all people are equal before the law? Choose Yes.
Do you have legitimate concerns on religious grounds? Choose No.

I have chosen Yes, by the way, but I'm otherwise not wasting my time on this distraction. And that is what it is - a distraction, to divert the attention of the public from the continuing ineptitude of this bad government.

Did the church and bride and groom sign a list of terms and conditions?

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

Mattyfisk

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 92458
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #41 - Sep 19^th, 2017 at 11:41pm

matty wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:51pm: