Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 27 28 29 
Send Topic Print
Global warming, the science and the consequences (Read 29192 times)
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Global warming, the science and the consequences
Reply #420 - Aug 31st, 2017 at 12:20am
 
Abstract of the Oreskes paper:
Quote:
Abstract
Get Flash Player
Download video

View all Environ. Res. Lett. video abstracts

This paper assesses whether ExxonMobil Corporation has in the past misled the general public about climate change. We present an empirical document-by-document textual content analysis and comparison of 187 climate change communications from ExxonMobil, including peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed publications, internal company documents, and paid, editorial-style advertisements ('advertorials') in The New York Times. We examine whether these communications sent consistent messages about the state of climate science and its implications—specifically, we compare their positions on climate change as real, human-caused, serious, and solvable. In all four cases, we find that as documents become more publicly accessible, they increasingly communicate doubt. This discrepancy is most pronounced between advertorials and all other documents. For example, accounting for expressions of reasonable doubt, 83% of peer-reviewed papers and 80% of internal documents acknowledge that climate change is real and human-caused, yet only 12% of advertorials do so, with 81% instead expressing doubt. We conclude that ExxonMobil contributed to advancing climate science—by way of its scientists' academic publications—but promoted doubt about it in advertorials. Given this discrepancy, we conclude that ExxonMobil misled the public. Our content analysis also examines ExxonMobil's discussion of the risks of stranded fossil fuel assets. We find the topic discussed and sometimes quantified in 24 documents of various types, but absent from advertorials. Finally, based on the available documents, we outline ExxonMobil's strategic approach to climate change research and communication, which helps to contextualize our findings.


http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f

Sounds legit. There was the article on that scientist working for Exxon that confirms it.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Global warming, the science and the consequences
Reply #421 - Aug 31st, 2017 at 12:33am
 
The study into the increased floods in the Gulf states:

Quote:
Abstract. A stationary low pressure system and elevated levels of precipitable water provided a nearly continuous source of precipitation over Louisiana, United States (US), starting around 10 August 2016. Precipitation was heaviest in the region broadly encompassing the city of Baton Rouge, with a 3-day maximum found at a station in Livingston, LA (east of Baton Rouge), from 12 to 14 August 2016 (648.3 mm, 25.5 inches). The intense precipitation was followed by inland flash flooding and river flooding and in subsequent days produced additional backwater flooding. On 16 August, Louisiana officials reported that 30 000 people had been rescued, nearly 10 600 people had slept in shelters on the night of 14 August and at least 60 600 homes had been impacted to varying degrees. As of 17 August, the floods were reported to have killed at least 13 people. As the disaster was unfolding, the Red Cross called the flooding the worst natural disaster in the US since Super Storm Sandy made landfall in New Jersey on 24 October 2012. Before the floodwaters had receded, the media began questioning whether this extreme event was caused by anthropogenic climate change. To provide the necessary analysis to understand the potential role of anthropogenic climate change, a rapid attribution analysis was launched in real time using the best readily available observational data and high-resolution global climate model simulations.

The objective of this study is to show the possibility of performing rapid attribution studies when both observational and model data and analysis methods are readily available upon the start. It is the authors' aspiration that the results be used to guide further studies of the devastating precipitation and flooding event. Here, we present a first estimate of how anthropogenic climate change has affected the likelihood of a comparable extreme precipitation event in the central US Gulf Coast. While the flooding event of interest triggering this study occurred in south Louisiana, for the purposes of our analysis, we have defined an extreme precipitation event by taking the spatial maximum of annual 3-day inland maximum precipitation over the region of 29–31° N, 85–95° W, which we refer to as the central US Gulf Coast. Using observational data, we find that the observed local return time of the 12–14 August precipitation event in 2016 is about 550 years (95 % confidence interval (CI): 450–1450). The probability for an event like this to happen anywhere in the region is presently 1 in 30 years (CI 11–110). We estimate that these probabilities and the intensity of extreme precipitation events of this return time have increased since 1900. A central US Gulf Coast extreme precipitation event has effectively become more likely in 2016 than it was in 1900. The global climate models tell a similar story; in the most accurate analyses, the regional probability of 3-day extreme precipitation increases by more than a factor of 1.4 due to anthropogenic climate change. The magnitude of the shift in probabilities is greater in the 25 km (higher-resolution) climate model than in the 50 km model. The evidence for a relation to El Niño half a year earlier is equivocal, with some analyses showing a positive connection and others none.


https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/897/2017/

12 years since the last flood babbled Cpl Lees. Nope—major flood from a rain event last year in Louisiana. Guess that destruction of the smh article was less than total.

That a weak high pressure system blocked the hurricane from advancing is not unusual, plenty of times in southern Australian weather reports we hear of a system blocking other weather systems. Arctic air that spills south often gets blocked by a high pressure systems bringing days of blizzards and snow etc where the Arctic air stays until the blocking system moves or weakens.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Global warming, the science and the consequences
Reply #422 - Aug 31st, 2017 at 10:08am
 
Abstract of the study into more intense typhoons:

Quote:
Abstract
Super typhoons (STYs), intense tropical cyclones of the western North Pacific, rank among the most destructive natural hazards globally. The violent winds of these storms induce deep mixing of the upper ocean, resulting in strong sea surface cooling and making STYs highly sensitive to ocean density stratification. Although a few studies examined the potential impacts of changes in ocean thermal structure on future tropical cyclones, they did not take into account changes in near-surface salinity. Here, using a combination of observations and coupled climate model simulations, we show that freshening of the upper ocean, caused by greater rainfall in places where typhoons form, tends to intensify STYs by reducing their ability to cool the upper ocean. We further demonstrate that the strengthening effect of this freshening over the period 1961–2008 is ∼53% stronger than the suppressive effect of temperature, whereas under twenty-first century projections, the positive effect of salinity is about half of the negative effect of ocean temperature changes.


https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms13670

The whole paper is available if Cpl Lees wants to use his pretend scientific skills to “demolish” the paper.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21533
Gender: male
Re: Global warming, the science and the consequences
Reply #423 - Aug 31st, 2017 at 12:04pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 31st, 2017 at 12:20am:
Sounds legit. There was the article on that scientist working for Exxon that confirms it.



That's why she had to use Cook's flawed methodlgy? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21533
Gender: male
Re: Global warming, the science and the consequences
Reply #424 - Aug 31st, 2017 at 12:06pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 31st, 2017 at 12:33am:
12 years since the last flood babbled Cpl Lees. Nope—major flood from a rain event last year in Louisiana. Guess that destruction of the smh article was less than total.



Now you are confusing a rain event with a "major hurricane" cat 3 or larger? Oh dear. Now yo have really lost it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Global warming, the science and the consequences
Reply #425 - Aug 31st, 2017 at 1:50pm
 
You don’t think twice as much rain as the previous record a severe weather event?
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21533
Gender: male
Re: Global warming, the science and the consequences
Reply #426 - Aug 31st, 2017 at 3:05pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 31st, 2017 at 1:50pm:
You don’t think twice as much rain as the previous record a severe weather event?


It is not the same as a Major Hurricane.

Please show it was twice as much rain in Houston.

The rainfall record in one day is "10.34 inches on June 26, 1989"

http://www.weather.gov/hgx/climate_iah_normals_summary

Courtesy NOAA and National Weather Service.

HOUSTON WEATHER FORECAST OFFICE      43.38

http://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/discussions/nfdscc1.html

Rainfall. Harvey - Houston. inches

A measure of intensity is daily rainfall. Total rainfall depends on how long it hangs around.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21533
Gender: male
Re: Global warming, the science and the consequences
Reply #427 - Aug 31st, 2017 at 3:10pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 31st, 2017 at 10:08am:
Abstract of the study into more intense typhoons:



Yet I wasn't saying  "Climate Scientists" hadn't published stuff on intensity. I was commenting on Hannam, saying it didn't happen "every year". 11 or12 years is a lot longer then 1 year. According to the mantra it should have happened before now. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21533
Gender: male
Re: Global warming, the science and the consequences
Reply #428 - Sep 1st, 2017 at 9:21pm
 
"By Joe Bastardi
August 29, 2017, Reprinted with the permission of Weatherbell.com"

"I was emailed this quote, supposedly from him. It’s making the rounds in the skeptic community. It was in the Guardian

    The stalling is due to very weak prevailing winds, which are failing to steer the storm off to sea, allowing it to spin around and wobble back and forth. This pattern, in turn, is associated with a greatly expanded subtropical high pressure system over much of the US at the moment, with the jet stream pushed well to the north. This pattern of subtropical expansion is predicted in model simulations of human-caused climate change.

He unwittingly describes THE EXACT OPPOSITE EFFECT to what is going on.

He could not have even looked at the 5 day means! There was no expansive subtropical high. Quite the contrary there was a well forecast MJO phase 2, with a major cool trough in the 5 day means trapping the hurricane. "

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/08/31/michael-manns-claims-that-harvey-was-caus...

Michael E Mann, he may have Physics. But he knows schickem about atmospherics. Wink





p
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Global warming, the science and the consequences
Reply #429 - Sep 17th, 2017 at 1:36pm
 
LOL....
fact
2017 biggest snow season in Australia for years
snow season extended.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 122096
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Global warming, the science and the consequences
Reply #430 - Sep 17th, 2017 at 9:01pm
 



John Casey Exposes Global Warming Fraud



Published on Feb 9, 2014
In this video Mr. Casey exposes the global warming fraud and brings your attention to an ice age threat which is threatening our planet and the peak point is about 2030 - 2031. This video has been uploaded with Mr. John Casey's written permission and is copyright of Mr. John Casey.

Mr. John L. Casey is the former White House space program adviser, consultant to NASA Headquarters, and space shuttle engineer. He is the President of Space and Science Research Center http://www.spaceandscience.net

He is one of America's most successful climate change researchers and climate prediction experts. Mr. Casey is the leading advocate in the US for a national and international plan to prepare for the next climate change to one of a dangerous cold climate era. This new cold era is caused by a historic decline in the Sun's energy output, what he calls a "solar hibernation."

He is the author of the internationally acclaimed climate science book, "Cold Sun" which describes the rationale for understanding why global warming has ended and the effects of the new cold climate era.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 29 
Send Topic Print