Pho Huc wrote on Jun 30
th, 2017 at 12:10am:
This wouldn't be Lee trying to argue with the person and not argue about the issue would it? Usually that's the debating technique either idiots or people with nothing to back up their opinions use.
Of course, you could prove me wrong and provide some peer reviewed evidence that supports any of the "wisdom" that you post here, but we all know that's never going to happen
You are so funny.
Jovial Monk wrote on Jun 27
th, 2017 at 11:20pm:
However, the accelerations observed over century and longer periods2 have not been clearly detected in altimeter data spanning the past two decades3, 4, 5. Here we show that the rise, from the sum of all observed contributions to GMSL, increases from 2.2 ± 0.3 mm yr−1 in 1993 to 3.3 ± 0.3 mm yr−1 in 2014
lee wrote on Jun 28
th, 2017 at 11:54am:
from Jason -2
"Measure the surface topography of the world's oceans to within a few centimetres, which is important for accurately describing seasonal and inter-annual climate variations, etc. "
https://www.eumetsat.int/jason/print.htm
A few centimetres? 20-30mm accuracy? Too funny.
Now you do understand that an accuracy of centimetres cannot give readings accurate to 0.3mm.
Or if you have a different view please give it, with citation.
Pho Huc wrote on Jun 30
th, 2017 at 12:10am:
you could prove me wrong and provide some peer reviewed evidence that supports any of the "wisdom" that you post here,
Being able to read would be a good start.
BTW - What was the outcome of your review of AR5. Chapter9 Table 9.5.