Australian Politics Forum - Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay

GordyL Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4365 Hate Town Gender:	Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay Reply #60 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 4:08pm Putting aside all of Mr Dutton's faults, who else thinks he has a perdy mouth?
Back to top	On the Ning Nang Nong Where the Cows go Bong! and the monkeys all say BOO! IP Logged

double plus good Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5693 Gender:	Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay Reply #61 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 4:12pm The fact that they're not refugees just doesn't matter to you, does it nump? BTW, he does have a bit of a pretty mouth. I don't want him to squeal like a pig, though.
Back to top	IP Logged

Stratos Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4725	Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay Reply #62 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 4:37pm double plus good wrote on Feb 19^th, 2016 at 4:01pm: Sex trafficking is a law enforcment issue. You can't see any reason why anybody anywhere might have reason to seek asylum for fear from a sex trafficking organisation?
Back to top	Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15^th, 2014 at 11:24pm: Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act IP Logged

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay
Reply #63 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 4:56pm

There's rampant gun crime and drug trafficking in Washington DC. Why not refugees from America? Drug cartels in Mexico? Jungle justice in Nigeria? Endemic organised crime in Putin's Russia. The statlessness of the Armenians. The attempts of Israel's neighbours to wipe her out of existence. Columbia. Northern Ireland. The Congo. The list goes on and on. Isn't the definition of a refugee someone fleeing persecution; not just a f#$ked up country?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Feb 19^th, 2016 at 5:48pm by double plus good »

IP Logged

Stratos Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4725	Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay Reply #64 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 5:00pm double plus good wrote on Feb 19^th, 2016 at 4:56pm: Isn't the definition of a refugee someone fleeing persecution What evidence do you have to suggest Asha and her family do not fit this description?
Back to top	Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15^th, 2014 at 11:24pm: Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay Reply #65 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 5:21pm It was announced that anyone who comes on a people smuggler boat after a certain date would never be allowed to settle permanently in Australia. People who ignored this warning should not be exempted from the rule just because they have a baby to blackmail Australia with. No means no. It's not difficult.
Back to top	IP Logged

double plus good Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5693 Gender:	Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay Reply #66 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 5:47pm Good question, Stratos. Have you read anywhere that these asylum seekers, are in fact, refugees? Is being pregnant solely grounds for asylum now? The ABC and Fauxfacts are too busy picking out baby clothes to even bother finding out.
Back to top	IP Logged

Kat Gold Member Offline Socialism IS the answer. Posts: 17709 Everywhere and no-where Gender:	Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay Reply #67 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 5:54pm Baby Asha, and those like her, are the reason why we CANNOT let Dutton stay.
Back to top	IP Logged

double plus good Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5693 Gender:	Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay Reply #68 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 5:57pm Do you ever post anything that isn't a spermicidal regurgitation of all things leftard?
Back to top	IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay Reply #69 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 7:58pm Kat wrote on Feb 19^th, 2016 at 5:54pm: Baby Asha, and those like her, are the reason why we CANNOT let Dutton stay. Parents of 'baby Asha' what have you DONE to her????!!!!!!! You cruel, heartless tormenters of baby Asha!!!!! SHame!!!! Shame!!!!!! You call yourself parents??!!!??!
Back to top	IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 41307 Gender:	Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay Reply #70 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 8:09pm Throw it out of an 11th floor window. That's the sole right illegals have.
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 61265 Here Gender:	Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay Reply #71 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 8:47pm Kat wrote on Feb 19^th, 2016 at 5:54pm: Baby Asha, and those like her, are the reason why we CANNOT let Dutton stay. Too true.
Back to top	IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 61265 Here Gender:	Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay Reply #72 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 8:54pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 19^th, 2016 at 8:09pm: Throw it out of an 11th floor window. That's the sole right illegals have. The baby was born here - nothing illegal about that ? In fact there is no place for stupid emotive labelling particularly when it isn't even correct.
Back to top	IP Logged

Kat Gold Member Offline Socialism IS the answer. Posts: 17709 Everywhere and no-where Gender:	Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay Reply #73 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 9:09pm double plus good wrote on Feb 19^th, 2016 at 5:57pm: Do you ever post anything that isn't a spermicidal regurgitation of all things leftard? How you perceive my comments is your problem, not mine.
Back to top	IP Logged

Sprintcyclist

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 41307
Gender: male

Re: Why Mr Dutton cannot let baby Asha stay
Reply #74 - Feb 19^th, 2016 at 9:22pm

Dnarever wrote on Feb 19^th, 2016 at 8:54pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 19^th, 2016 at 8:09pm:

Throw it out of an 11th floor window.

That's the sole right illegals have.

The baby was born here - nothing illegal about that ?

In fact there is no place for stupid emotive labelling particularly when it isn't even correct.

yes, its mother is an illegal

Back to top

Modern Classic Right Wing

IP Logged