Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Abbott to deregulate the banks ? (Read 2959 times)
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #15 - Jun 21st, 2014 at 9:42am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jun 21st, 2014 at 7:03am:
John Smith wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 10:30pm:
Grendel wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 9:29pm:
Then rest happy, that at this stage the 2 people having spoken about this from the Liberals; Abbott and Robb say they are not going to do it.


they also said they weren't going to introduce any new taxes, weren't going to cut health and education, weren't going to touch pensions, weren't going to 

oh bugger, it there's just to many to list ... you get the drift.


... and Gillard said there'd be no carbon tax!


ok, Gillard broke one promise (due to a change in circumstances) and Abbott has lied about single one of his promises .... yet you've condemed Gillard a million times for hers but not said one bad word about Abbotts broken promises  .... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Kytro
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Blasphemy: a victimless
crime

Posts: 3409
Adelaide
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #16 - Jun 21st, 2014 at 12:11pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 10:49pm:
You do realise they took over from a Government that increased debt every single year (despite promising not to - but that's another story).

Cuts were necessary.

Why did the last lot run up so much debt? That's the question.



Well primarily the debt was caused because the economic downturn reduced income. Cutting spending during or shortly after the crisis would have been very risky.

It's also not "so much". It is manageable. This is clear because there is little difference between the overall budgets are minimal in terms of cost.

The cuts are not necessary per se, and certainly not targeted where they are. There are other options, and this is why the budget is so unpopular.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lobo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7407
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #17 - Jun 21st, 2014 at 2:43pm
 
ian wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 11:56pm:
cods wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 11:16pm:

the real question is andrei..

WHAT DID WE GET FOR THAT WHOPPING BIG DEBT....


bugger all.
still got your pension Cods? Look around at the european countries holding out the begging bowl. Consider yourself lucky.



And the $900 stimulus payment?
And the heavily discounted insulation in your ceiling?

Wink
Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
Lobo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7407
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #18 - Jun 21st, 2014 at 2:46pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 10:49pm:
You do realise they took over from a Government that increased debt every single year (despite promising not to - but that's another story).

Cuts were necessary.

Why did the last lot run up so much debt? That's the question.


Which has to do exactly what with deregulating the banking system??

Cheesy
Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #19 - Jun 21st, 2014 at 3:55pm
 
Lobo wrote on Jun 21st, 2014 at 2:46pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 10:49pm:
You do realise they took over from a Government that increased debt every single year (despite promising not to - but that's another story).

Cuts were necessary.

Why did the last lot run up so much debt? That's the question.


Which has to do exactly what with deregulating the banking system??

Cheesy


don't argue with Andrei ... he's the best accountant in his world .. he knows how these things work.

You cannot deregulate a bank if the govt. keeps running deficits ....
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
crocodile
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6683
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #20 - Jun 21st, 2014 at 5:20pm
 
Kytro wrote on Jun 21st, 2014 at 12:11pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 10:49pm:
You do realise they took over from a Government that increased debt every single year (despite promising not to - but that's another story).

Cuts were necessary.

Why did the last lot run up so much debt? That's the question.



Well primarily the debt was caused because the economic downturn reduced income. Cutting spending during or shortly after the crisis would have been very risky.

It's also not "so much". It is manageable. This is clear because there is little difference between the overall budgets are minimal in terms of cost.

The cuts are not necessary per se, and certainly not targeted where they are. There are other options, and this is why the budget is so unpopular.


On top of what you say is also the situation where the majority of budget expenditure is sewn up in legislation. To wind back the spending program would require passage through the parliament. By the time this happens, the debts already exist.

Back to top
 

Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes.
 
IP Logged
 
crocodile
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6683
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #21 - Jun 21st, 2014 at 5:21pm
 
Quote:
You cannot deregulate a bank if the govt. keeps running deficits ....


Why not ?
Back to top
 

Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #22 - Jun 21st, 2014 at 7:22pm
 
crocodile wrote on Jun 21st, 2014 at 5:21pm:
Quote:
You cannot deregulate a bank if the govt. keeps running deficits ....


Why not ?


don't ask me ... Andrei was the one who seems to think one affects the other.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #23 - Jun 22nd, 2014 at 11:42am
 
John Smith wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 10:30pm:
Grendel wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 9:29pm:
Then rest happy, that at this stage the 2 people having spoken about this from the Liberals; Abbott and Robb say they are not going to do it.


they also said they weren't going to introduce any new taxes, weren't going to cut health and education, weren't going to touch pensions, weren't going to 

oh bugger, it there's just to many to list ... you get the drift.

There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead...
lie of the century.

Apples and Oranges when it comes to the budget.

It never had to happen, unfortunately many of the Coalition budget measures do have to happen.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Tony
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 190
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #24 - Jun 22nd, 2014 at 11:48am
 
No they don’t.

Cut out negative gearing, FBT fiddles, stuff like that. No need to see under30s reduced to begging, crime etc to live, dreadful waste of human potential.

I gave up on the Libs, formally resigned from the Party because they are no longer liberal, they are neoconservatives and would happily see all of us here thrown into the street to help a crony of theirs.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #25 - Jun 22nd, 2014 at 2:00pm
 
Tony wrote on Jun 22nd, 2014 at 11:48am:
No they don’t.

Cut out negative gearing, FBT fiddles, stuff like that. No need to see under30s reduced to begging, crime etc to live, dreadful waste of human potential.

I gave up on the Libs, formally resigned from the Party because they are no longer liberal, they are neoconservatives and would happily see all of us here thrown into the street to help a crony of theirs.

Yes they do....  care to compare a full list of measures.
Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Kytro
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Blasphemy: a victimless
crime

Posts: 3409
Adelaide
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #26 - Jun 22nd, 2014 at 2:23pm
 
crocodile wrote on Jun 21st, 2014 at 5:20pm:
Kytro wrote on Jun 21st, 2014 at 12:11pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 10:49pm:
You do realise they took over from a Government that increased debt every single year (despite promising not to - but that's another story).

Cuts were necessary.

Why did the last lot run up so much debt? That's the question.



Well primarily the debt was caused because the economic downturn reduced income. Cutting spending during or shortly after the crisis would have been very risky.

It's also not "so much". It is manageable. This is clear because there is little difference between the overall budgets are minimal in terms of cost.

The cuts are not necessary per se, and certainly not targeted where they are. There are other options, and this is why the budget is so unpopular.


On top of what you say is also the situation where the majority of budget expenditure is sewn up in legislation. To wind back the spending program would require passage through the parliament. By the time this happens, the debts already exist.


Perhaps then, tax should be increased to compensate until such time as the economy improves. Taxation is low at the moment and it should be adjusted from time to time.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #27 - Jun 22nd, 2014 at 3:10pm
 
Grendel wrote on Jun 22nd, 2014 at 11:42am:
John Smith wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 10:30pm:
Grendel wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 9:29pm:
Then rest happy, that at this stage the 2 people having spoken about this from the Liberals; Abbott and Robb say they are not going to do it.


they also said they weren't going to introduce any new taxes, weren't going to cut health and education, weren't going to touch pensions, weren't going to 

oh bugger, it there's just to many to list ... you get the drift.

There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead...
lie of the century.

Apples and Oranges when it comes to the budget.

It never had to happen, unfortunately many of the Coalition budget measures do have to happen.



for someone who's always crying about how they're not biased, you certainly make a good Abbott sychophant

'Had to happen' ????  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin  Only in your little head maybe ... nothing had to happen ... just as he didn't HAVE to promise that they wouldn't, knowing full well that they would
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #28 - Jun 22nd, 2014 at 7:07pm
 
I'm sorry, but since I'm not a rusted-on like You Johnboy I can see past your political bias and to the reality of the situation and no we cannot keep going down the path the ALP was taking us.
Even Malcolm Turnbull who would make a fine Leader for the ALP admits they were taking us down the toilet.
Wakey wakey Johnboy.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
The fact you deny certain things need and have to happen is a testament to your stupidity and political bias.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
crocodile
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6683
Gender: male
Re: Abbott to deregulate the banks ?
Reply #29 - Jun 22nd, 2014 at 7:27pm
 
Kytro wrote on Jun 22nd, 2014 at 2:23pm:
crocodile wrote on Jun 21st, 2014 at 5:20pm:
Kytro wrote on Jun 21st, 2014 at 12:11pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 20th, 2014 at 10:49pm:
You do realise they took over from a Government that increased debt every single year (despite promising not to - but that's another story).

Cuts were necessary.

Why did the last lot run up so much debt? That's the question.


Well primarily the debt was caused because the economic downturn reduced income. Cutting spending during or shortly after the crisis would have been very risky.

It's also not "so much". It is manageable. This is clear because there is little difference between the overall budgets are minimal in terms of cost.

The cuts are not necessary per se, and certainly not targeted where they are. There are other options, and this is why the budget is so unpopular.


On top of what you say is also the situation where the majority of budget expenditure is sewn up in legislation. To wind back the spending program would require passage through the parliament. By the time this happens, the debts already exist.


Perhaps then, tax should be increased to compensate until such time as the economy improves. Taxation is low at the moment and it should be adjusted from time to time.


Taxation changes are also subject to legislation. The drop in expected revenue happens before any programs for winding back expenditure or increasing taxes can be put before the parliament. Unfortunately, the shortfall has to be covered by borrowing money. It really is that simple.

It is also worth pointing out that raising taxes does not always cause a linear rise in revenue.
Back to top
 

Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print