freediver wrote on Feb 4
th, 2014 at 7:58pm:
What happened there Gandalf?
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 3
rd, 2014 at 8:56am:
And since you have singularly failed to relate this in any way to "judging muslims by actions, not views" - despite repeated requests to do so, I will be moving this whole discussion to where it belongs - in the Egyptian protest thread.
freediver wrote on Feb 4
th, 2014 at 7:58pm:
The context was the number of placards supporting each, and how you would interpret that. I have explained to you many times now that it was for context.
How many beheading placards were there FD? 2? 3? Out of an estimated 200 people - well golly gosh thats about the same ratio as 100 protestors with 1 democracy placard. What does that say FD?
freediver wrote on Feb 4
th, 2014 at 7:58pm:
Half of the protestors may well be in support of Morsi retaking Egypt violently and installing himself as dictator.
Yes, clearly these people are pro violence - as indicated by all the pro-peace and anti violent coup placards, as well as the street theatre portraying the brutality of the coup.
freediver wrote on Feb 4
th, 2014 at 7:58pm:
Protesting against an undemocratic event does not necessarily mean you support democracy in principle, and you do not have to be pro-democracy to rally against it.
I agree 100% - and thats the point you continue to misunderstand - whether or not these people are sincere about their calls for democracy is completely beside the point. The only point I am trying to get across is that they are undeniably staging a protest in support of democracy. I never once said that these people are luvvy duvvy progressives who have an innate support for democracy.
freediver wrote on Feb 4
th, 2014 at 7:58pm:
Quote:
It simply isn't relevant to the fact that in this protest they are clearly demonstrating in support of democracy
An earlier post from Gandalf:
Quote:
The protestors clearly indicate that their concern is Egyptian democracy
Nice backpedaling there Gandalf.
Oh look, FD wants to quibble over the use of the word "indicate". Do you think its just *POSSIBLE* that you can "indicate support" for something without being genuine about it? Neither of those statements says anything at all about their true motives, merely the simple and undeniable fact that the actual protest is about supporting democracy. Of course they may be lying and/or being hypocritical, who the hell knows? Its completely irrelevant to the simple point I've been making.
freediver wrote on Feb 4
th, 2014 at 7:58pm:
What I asked is how they "clearly indicate that their concern is Egyptian democracy"
I know its extremely difficult to comprehend - but people holding a demonstration against an attack on a democratically elected President, while promoting such things as "peace" and "justice" and "freedom" and "democracy", then this
clearly indicates that their concern is Egyptian democracy. Or to put it another way, it
clearly shows that they are demonstrating in support of democracy.