Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 14
th, 2013 at 8:18am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 16
th, 2013 at 1:03pm:
I do love it how FD starts all these threads with absolutely no scope for a constructive discussion - just to say "there! I scored a point!"
That's not why he 'starts all these threads'. It's not an exercise in personal vanity for him. Nothing so trite, as you would like to believe for your own egotistical convenience.
Every time you and your little coterie of apologist 'Useful Idiot' collaborators attempt to defend the indefensible, fd once again successfully demonstrates that civilisation is always at risk of its enemies,
and that you people would like to drag us back to a time when theocratic lunacy used to rule the lives of whole nations as is still the case in half a dozen Islamic states.
Herbert,
Exactly so.
Public debate is a process of exposure.
And public debate, is a place where ideas and 'ideals' can be compared, against each other [by being defended or condemned].
And by being 'forced' to publicly defend those particular 'ideals' [which we are prepared to publicly defend],
then it exposes and reveals [for everyone to see!], what is in our heart.
No ?
It should be instructive to us too,
to understand that it is a crime, in all 'rightly guided' ISLAMIC jurisdictions, to subject ISLAM to free and open public scrutiny [and thereby expose to the public glare, what ISLAM really is].
i.e.
It should be instructive to us too,
to understand that
in the home of ISLAM, it is a capital offence, to publicly and openly scrutinise ISLAM!!! Quote:
ISLAM is a lie and truth is killing it.
Posted by: Alaskan
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/023681.php#c602782Are forums like this slowly dying?http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1365893107/5#5 Quote:
If i do regard ISLAM as an 'offensive' philosophy, then in a 'free and open' forum, shouldn't i be permitted to express that point of view, and to demonstrate, why i hold that particular view about ISLAM?
And if the detractors [of certain comments i have made] have a legitimate complaint, then let them air it [IN THE FORUM], and have their complaint tested in debate!
.....FOR ALL TO SEE.
Shouldn't the ABC forum MODERATORS allow those people who frequent the ABC forum pages, to decide for themselves if my [or anyone elses] arguments have any merit [or not]?
If what i say is untrue, or ridiculous, that fact, will soon become apparent to everyone, when what i say, is exposed to the light of [widespread] scrutiny.
Open societies do not fear the opinions of fools.
....they rather, EXPOSE and laugh at folly!
In any free and open debate, if a 'position' is absurd, if an 'argument' is absurd,
...then the debater is [often] condemned to all, WITH HIS OWN WORDS.
And isn't the exposure of folly, and error, THE VERY FUNCTION, of free and open debate?
Free and open debate *is meant* to be a contest of ideas!
....where every folly is revealed.
And i would contend, that open debate is healthy, to all general freedoms in a society.
Whereas, lies are easily concealed in closed societies,
....*because* these closed societies are places where lies, and falsehood,
....ARE NEVER EXPOSED TO SCRUTINY, OR SPOKEN TRUTH.