polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 24^th, 2018 at 2:18pm:



Why is one insulting and not the other? Do you think it would be less ambiguous if we said "Muslim outfit"?

Quote:


It is obvious that the KKK outfit is less popular than the letterbox outfit. But what point are you trying to make with this? Or is this the non-point you were talking about?

freediver wrote on Apr 24^th, 2018 at 6:40pm:


You asked for it, G.

freediver wrote on Apr 24^th, 2018 at 6:40pm:



It's no rape if she is your war booty slave girl that 'your right hand possesses'.  Party like it's 631 ad, sons of Mohammed.

Frank wrote on Apr 24^th, 2018 at 7:36pm:


Or party like it's 1831 and the good old days of the plantation.

No sex please, old boy. We've an empire to defend.

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 24^th, 2018 at 12:12pm:

Immigrants can and do create jobs, but can’t create identities for the host population, only compete for the existing identity of a nation.

This makes certain “small” matters, often dismissed as merely symbolic — permitting turbans on construction sites, say, or ceremonial daggers in schools — actually more important than ostensibly hard-nosed economic issues. A flag — a piece of fabric on a stick — is just a symbol, but a demonstration in Australia conducted under an Australian flag is materially different from one conducted under the flag of Palestine, Hamas, Hezbollah. The first is a country trying to share a problem; the second, a problem trying to share a country.




Memorise, gandalf.  Islam is intruding into every country, trying to infect them with its problems. Yasssssssmin's tweet is a case in point - she wants to infect Australia with Islamic concerns opportunistically and screams racism when her crude and idiotic attempt is rejected.
But no toothy Muslima can be wrong in a Western country, otherwise it's wacist.

Strip out the wace and the Islam-a-bad weligion - she has nothing worthwhile left to say. It is AL abouy race and religion when they have no place. But SHE denies that she politicised or identity-politiced the discussion. She is lying, of course.  Fkorf is the only correct response.  But you can't say that to tinted Muslim women. They can be as thick as anything, you must validate their stupidity lest you are lazily labelled.

Let us politicise and race-bate thee next Ramadan. See how Yassssssmin likes that.

Next Ramadan, let's all tweet - 'hey,  lest we forget the hundreds of millions of dead due to the spread of Islam. Tuck in, the sun's down'.i

Karnal wrote on Apr 24^th, 2018 at 9:59pm:

Exactly - evil and atavism  must be subjugated and suppressed, not given equal opportunity. Gardening 101 . ONE ( not you, of course) does not want toxic weeds to have equal opportunity.
You, being the killer weed, always speak up for evil.

Karnal wrote on Apr 25^th, 2018 at 1:47am:

  Stupid old pederast.

Is everyone a toxic weed who blew here - or only the ones who want to defend it? You are cool with all the barbarians who want to destroy your civilisation and communities but you bark like a wounded seal with a pole up him when someone stands up for it.

Stupid, discombobulated old bottom-feeder.

freediver wrote on Apr 24^th, 2018 at 6:35pm:


Yes FD literally just asked that.


Quote:


That the distinctions I referred to exist. Obviously.

Are you actually still insisting that a little lady wearing a "letterbox outfit" is no less sinister than someone in a KKK outfit?