That's what I am talking about. White racists and extreme Muslims attack or threaten to attack to force others follow their own value/culture.

The law should stop both of them.

IMO, there is probably nothing more unethical in the world today, than the 'humanist' worldview, and those who promote so called liberal 'ethics'.



IMO, this generation of mankind has lost the ability to discern between good and evil.

The Judeao-Christian standards and morality, that guided our present culture in its formative period, has been almost entirely abandoned.
Why is that?

Just take a moment, and look at the total moral mess the Western world is in today.
IMO, this is the consequence largely, of the influence of 'academics' and godless social 'theorists'!
IMO, almost all of the 'humanist', and social engineering type areas of academia, are clearly, divorced from reality.
They are living in a la-la-land, and are unethically ignoring the consequences of their own mistaken social experiments.
They are engrossed in a politically correct idiocy, which is a denial of the real world consequences of their own moral 'inadequacy'.
i.e.
These people who promote 'humanist values' are totally, morally corrupt, and they seem to exhibit a hatred for truth.
And why?
Because the truth confronts and exposes the error of their claptrap [<--- that's a technical term] social theories.

Humanist, and liberal ethics seem embrace an idea, and want to teach us, that man is naturally good.

Today, our children are taught that it is wrong to try to 'discriminate' between good and evil, and to reject what is evil.
Today, they and we, are taught that, essentially, good and evil do not exist.
And we are taught that all people are equally like us.
Today, those who abandon standards, and moral discernment are said to be 'tolerant'.
And we are taught that to differentiate the merits of different cultures, is wrong, and 'racist'.

IMO, refusing to condemn the wicked, so as to 'avoid conflict', and so as to promote 'social harmony', is not an ethical position.
It is idiocy.

IMO, 'humanism', teaches mankind, to abandon all spiritual discernment.
IMO, such a position, teaches mankind, to embrace an empty, worldly, 'humanist' 'value' system, a 'religion', a political system, which uses the authority of a false 'righteousness', to rule over a 'blind', worldly directed mankind, imo.

'Humanism' spiritually guts us, imo.

We are taught, to abandon all spiritual discernment, and instead, embrace an 'empty', worldly 'value' system.
And 'humanism' often seeks to puff up our self pride, but leaves us without any discernment, and without a moral compass and without any spiritual hope.
We are spiritually, dumbed down by 'humanist' values.
And it is intentional 'end game', imo.

Bowen wrote on May 30^th, 2013 at 3:51pm:


When was the last time 'white power' groups in Australia went around beating up non-white folk?

I already came to Australia. I have the same right to say what is Australian culture as you.

I won't force you to follow my culture and you have no rights to force me to follow your culture.

Didn't you read the news? Do you remember the french girl on the bus of Melbourne several months ago? And the Asian victims attacked by racists on the train of Sydney last year.

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 30^th, 2013 at 4:42pm:

Bowen wrote on May 30^th, 2013 at 10:17pm:


Those French people were white, so I don't know how racism comes into it.

If you want to experience some real racism, hang out in western Sydney train stations at night or around Lakemba and Bankstown. The Middle Easterners will show you some real racial brutality, not this softcock stuff the 'racist' whites do. Then try some of the parks in country towns around Australia at night. I am sure the local drunken Aboriginials will treat you to a good time with a few broken beer bottles over the face.

You are wrong. Living in one's own culture is the human rights. It's a part of the freedom of religion. If the law is against multiculturalism, it's against human rights.

The basic human rights is higher than the law of a particular country. Otherwise why we are against Taliban practice the Islamic law in their own country? And what is universal values？

Do you believe there are universal values？

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 30^th, 2013 at 11:40pm: