Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll closed Poll
Question: Should Australia Buy the US product?
*** This poll has now closed ***


yes    
  6 (46.2%)
no    
  7 (53.8%)




Total votes: 13
« Last Modified by: Emma on: Mar 4th, 2013 at 6:38pm »

Pages: 1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 ... 53
Send Topic Print
Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?. (Read 74376 times)
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 111090
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #585 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 7:48am
 
BigOl,
Don't shoot the messenger - in this case a wing commander.

Quote:
WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS (RET'D):
This is an example of the endgame. The JSFs are out of ammunition, they're out of fuel, they're headed for home. They've got no choice but to present their rear ends to the Flankers.

The Flankers can see them on infra-red, they can see them on radar, they've got fuel, they've got weapons - so they just run them down and kill them.

ANDREW FOWLER: Now he's war-gaming the plane for his own company as a private consultant. But he says the outcome is the same.

WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS (RET'D) (indicating the projection): Here we see another JSF has just died...

ANDREW FOWLER: In this scenario involving an air battle against the Chinese version of the Sukhois, only one of the 24 JSFs survive.

WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS (RET'D) (indicating a chart of losses and expenditures for the simulated battle): Okay, what have we got here? This is the loss for the USA - both of AWAC Sentries, all of the tankers, and 23 of the 24 JSFs.

So this is particularly bad day at the office. They don't usually lose quite that many.

ANDREW FOWLER: Mills has repeated the war game exercise several times. Each time it's a similar story.

WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS (RET'D): Two hundred and forty Joint Strike Fighters went out over those ten missions and 35 came home - so that's not quite annihilation but it's a very savage defeat.


http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2013/02/18/3690317.htm
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #586 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 7:59am
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 7:48am:
BigOl,
Don't shoot the messenger - in this case a wing commander.

Quote:
WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS (RET'D):
This is an example of the endgame. The JSFs are out of ammunition, they're out of fuel, they're headed for home. They've got no choice but to present their rear ends to the Flankers.

The Flankers can see them on infra-red, they can see them on radar, they've got fuel, they've got weapons - so they just run them down and kill them.

ANDREW FOWLER: Now he's war-gaming the plane for his own company as a private consultant. But he says the outcome is the same.

WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS (RET'D) (indicating the projection): Here we see another JSF has just died...

ANDREW FOWLER: In this scenario involving an air battle against the Chinese version of the Sukhois, only one of the 24 JSFs survive.

WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS (RET'D) (indicating a chart of losses and expenditures for the simulated battle): Okay, what have we got here? This is the loss for the USA - both of AWAC Sentries, all of the tankers, and 23 of the 24 JSFs.

So this is particularly bad day at the office. They don't usually lose quite that many.

ANDREW FOWLER: Mills has repeated the war game exercise several times. Each time it's a similar story.

WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS (RET'D): Two hundred and forty Joint Strike Fighters went out over those ten missions and 35 came home - so that's not quite annihilation but it's a very savage defeat.


http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2013/02/18/3690317.htm



So what you and the Wing Comander are saying is that, the JSF is a bad aircraft because if it was out of ammo and fuel and the Flanker was not, it could be attacked and killed.

Yes, I see your point now. we should definitely buy aircraft that could sustain and win an air battle when they are out of fuel and ammo rather than ones that can't.

Mind you the Wing commander was a litttle vague on which aircraft would be best suited to a no fuel / no ammo scenario?



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 111090
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #587 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:03am
 
Now I've heard everything.

BigOl knows more about air battles than WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #588 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:07am
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:03am:
Now I've heard everything.

BigOl knows more about air battles than WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS.




I asked the question, which aircraft should we buy so that in an air battle where the aircraft has no fuel and no ammo it would win?

You and the good Wing Commander were a little vague on that, surely the solution is in the 4 corners report somewhere.


BTW, I am well versed in the requirments for fuel and ammo to win air battles.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 111090
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #589 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:13am
 
BigOl64 wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:07am:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:03am:
Now I've heard everything.

BigOl knows more about air battles than WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS.




I asked the question, which aircraft should we buy so that in an air battle where the aircraft has no fuel and no ammo it would win?

You and the good Wing Commander were a little vague on that, surely the solution is in the 4 corners report somewhere.


BTW, I am well versed in the requirments for fuel and ammo to win air battles.




BigOl,
Watch the 4 corners documentary.
I believe it was an exercise of a hypothetical attack on Jakarta.
I am sure that WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS thought about
any points that you have mentioned.

Why don't you have any respect for authority?
You have a problem.

forgiven

namaste


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #590 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:20am
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:13am:
BigOl64 wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:07am:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:03am:
Now I've heard everything.

BigOl knows more about air battles than WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS.




I asked the question, which aircraft should we buy so that in an air battle where the aircraft has no fuel and no ammo it would win?

You and the good Wing Commander were a little vague on that, surely the solution is in the 4 corners report somewhere.


BTW, I am well versed in the requirments for fuel and ammo to win air battles.




BigOl,
Watch the 4 corners documentary.
I believe it was an exercise of a hypothetical attack on Jakarta.
I am sure that WING COMMANDER CHRIS MILLS thought about
any points that you have mentioned.

Why don't you have any respect for authority?
You have a problem.

forgiven

namaste




So if I sit through the entire 4 corners report Chris Mills will tell me and the world which aircraft is capable of winning an air to air dog fight with no fuel and no ammo?

I hate to sit through 40 minutes of hyped up horse sh1t and be disappointed by finding out such an aircraft does not exist.


Now will this mighty killer of the skies be revealled to me if I sit through the 4 corners report?





Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 111090
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #591 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:28am
 
Dear BigOl,
please have a modicum of respect & at least watch the show you have denigrated - full of EXPERT opinion.


Quote:
It's been billed as the smartest jet fighter on the planet, designed to strike enemies in the air and on the ground without being detected by radar. But after a decade of intensive development, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) is over budget, a long way behind schedule and described by one expert as "big, fat and draggy".


Link to 4 Corners show:

http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2013/02/18/3690317.htm
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #592 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:31am
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:28am:
Dear BigOl,
please have a modicum of respect & at least watch the show you have denigrated - full of EXPERT opinion.


Quote:
It's been billed as the smartest jet fighter on the planet, designed to strike enemies in the air and on the ground without being detected by radar. But after a decade of intensive development, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) is over budget, a long way behind schedule and described by one expert as "big, fat and draggy".


Link to 4 Corners show:

http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2013/02/18/3690317.htm



I have already told you I have NO respect for 4 corners based on their previous efforts when reporting on Australia's military matters. I doubt that will change for the better after watching this particular episode.

So does this magical aircraft exist or not?

Because if it doesn't, then everything mills has to say about the lack of capability of the F35, tends to be a bit unfair if not smacking outragious, wouldn't you agree?


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 111090
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #593 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:33am
 
BigOl - at least watch the show before commenting.

You're infuriating.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #594 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:45am
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:33am:
BigOl - at least watch the show before commenting.

You're infuriating.



Answer my question first, saves me wasting 40 minutes of my life on a load of horse sh1t reporting.

Does this magical fighter exist, that can successfully conduct a dog fight without fuel of ammo?

Because that seems to be a major sticking point based on the jakarta scenario, so there must be a solution. Otherwise it was pointless to bring it up.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
viewpoint
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A joke is a very serious
thing. [Winston]

Posts: 2209
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #595 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:56am
 
Many countries including UK seem to be on the waiting list for this fault ridden aeroplane. Not only is it costing an absolute fortune, but so far it does not really have an impressive record of testing and development. I would stick with the F18s and the Typhoon (Eurofighter), both have excellent records and are a hell of a lot cheaper.
Back to top
 

Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
- Sir Winston Churchill
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #596 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 9:02am
 
viewpoint wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:56am:
Many countries including UK seem to be on the waiting list for this fault ridden aeroplane. Not only is it costing an absolute fortune, but so far it does not really have an impressive record of testing and development. I would stick with the F18s and the Typhoon (Eurofighter), both have excellent records and are a hell of a lot cheaper.



I suppose you could ask yourself why many of the major airforces of the world disagree with you and make that the basis of further research.

Including airforces that currently operate the F18 and Typhoon; surely at least one of them has come to a rational conclusion based on the facts.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
viewpoint
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A joke is a very serious
thing. [Winston]

Posts: 2209
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #597 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 9:08am
 
BigOl64 wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 9:02am:
viewpoint wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:56am:
Many countries including UK seem to be on the waiting list for this fault ridden aeroplane. Not only is it costing an absolute fortune, but so far it does not really have an impressive record of testing and development. I would stick with the F18s and the Typhoon (Eurofighter), both have excellent records and are a hell of a lot cheaper.



I suppose you could ask yourself why many of the major airforces of the world disagree with you and make that the basis of further research.

Including airforces that currently operate the F18 and Typhoon; surely at least one of them has come to a rational conclusion based on the facts.





The facts are that this plane is extremely expensive and has quite an unenviable history thus far. It has been in the "test and development" stage for a long time and as one problem is ironed out another materialises. Not really inspiring confidence so far.


Back to top
 

Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
- Sir Winston Churchill
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #598 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 9:13am
 
viewpoint wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 9:08am:
BigOl64 wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 9:02am:
viewpoint wrote on Sep 27th, 2013 at 8:56am:
Many countries including UK seem to be on the waiting list for this fault ridden aeroplane. Not only is it costing an absolute fortune, but so far it does not really have an impressive record of testing and development. I would stick with the F18s and the Typhoon (Eurofighter), both have excellent records and are a hell of a lot cheaper.



I suppose you could ask yourself why many of the major airforces of the world disagree with you and make that the basis of further research.

Including airforces that currently operate the F18 and Typhoon; surely at least one of them has come to a rational conclusion based on the facts.





The facts are that this plane is extremely expensive and has quite an unenviable history thus far. It has been in the "test and development" stage for a long time and as one problem is ironed out another materialises. Not really inspiring confidence so far.





Cutting edge technology tends to be like that.

The same was said of the F111 in the late 60s which is why we waited until 1973 to pick ours up, it took over a decade or more to iron out the wrinkles. But once we sorted out the technical issues it became one of the most lethal strike aircraft in the world.


If you want problem free aircraft buy old and proven technology, if not, expect some problems.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
viewpoint
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A joke is a very serious
thing. [Winston]

Posts: 2209
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia Buy These Fighter Jets?.
Reply #599 - Sep 27th, 2013 at 9:21am
 
Will manned aeroplanes be obsolete when this one is up to the mark? Fighters in the true sense of the word are already somewhat of a misnomer. The last dog-fights per se were over the Falklands exclusion zone. These days aircraft fire rockets at each other twenty miles apart.
Back to top
 

Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
- Sir Winston Churchill
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 ... 53
Send Topic Print