Tony Abbott needs to be piled on a plane with all of the other corrupt criminals and run out of Australia and banned from coming back.

Tony Abbott needs to be piled on a plane with all of the other corrupt criminals and run out of Australia and banned from coming back.

matty wrote on Feb 13^th, 2012 at 10:24pm:

Well I don't know about other lefties,mel, but I think preferred PM is very important. I am not concerned Abbott is preferred over Gillard though, Rudd has never been beaten as preferred PM by Abbott just like Rudd never lost a TPP against Abbott, and I expect Rudd will be PM again, sooner rather than later. When Rudd again becomes PM, if all the polls that you rightards seem to hang off are correct, Rudd will kick Abbotts ass.

In past centuries, politicians would have been beheaded for treason - also their soothsayers, Flannery and Garnaut.

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:14am:



don't forget the infamous excuse - it's a ROGUE POLL

matty wrote on Feb 13^th, 2012 at 10:24pm:

Well I don't know about other lefties,mel, but I think preferred PM is very important. I am not concerned Abbott is preferred over Gillard though, Rudd has never been beaten as preferred PM by Abbott just like Rudd never lost a TPP against Abbott, and I expect Rudd will be PM again, sooner rather than later. When Rudd again becomes PM, if all the polls that you rightards seem to hang off are correct, Rudd will kick Abbotts ass.

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 8:02am:

Post up the facts where Abbott has ever beaten Rudd, if you dont it just highlights you're a lying smartass.I expect TPP and preferred PM where Abbott beat Rudd,  I know you cant ,because you're a  liar.

skippy. wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 8:07am:


OH Drippy someone run over your dog   

fred the loser wrote-Your dribling shyte as usual  little man
Still cant refute my facts hey,moron???

You must be concerned about the return of Rudd, chook, Abbott NEVER beat him as preferred Pm or TPP, yet you think Rudd was incompetent, doesn't say much for phony tony, no wonder you dont want Rudd to return.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/newspoll-has-tony-abbott-back-i...

I guess that the PPM will suddenly become insignificant to the lefties. 

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 8:29am:

Gee you better tell your chums and the political parties,chook, because most of the country will tell you that its all about the numbers. Preferred PM and TPP wins elections. Here's a tip,chook, the person that gets the biggest TPP WINS the election, and Rudd ALWAYS beat phony tony, and the polls that ALL the rightards here gloat about ,and this thread is about, say that if Rudd was PM again he would kick phony tonys ass. What is it about facts that confuse you chook????

blackadder wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 9:09am:

Prove it or its another lie, which we expect from low life like you.
Post up anywhere that Abbott has beaten Rudd, lowlife.

Kevin Rudd Dudd is a gonner due to the Heiner affair

http://www.2gb.com/index2.php?option=com_newsmanager&task=view&id=11586

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 10:40am:

Once the public gets to view these documents and if thoroughly true, then I would not want Rudd or anyone involved, in politics anymore let alone PM.

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 10:59am:

Well I don't see anyone else stepping up and making sure that labor can't bury it.

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 10:59am:

Well I don't see anyone else stepping up and making sure that labor can't bury it.

If your rant was remotely true, then I would say it is a necessary evil.

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 11:05am:

LOL the filth that is the extreme right are trying to trot out the Heiner affair again ,this will be as big a failure as last time. but it does highlight how afraid the scum are of a return to Rudd.

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 11:19am:



You give Jones credit for Lindbergs work.....Jones said SFA until Lindberg provided the ammunition you dolt...Jones is an opportunistic tosser of the lowest order who did not care less about this woman until it became a problem for Kevin Rudd!!!

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 11:29am:

No I give Jones credit for being a bulldog and will not allow for the great work of Lendberg to go to waste and for the poor girl to suffer any longer from a labor party.

You dolt.

It is not about loyalty, it is about a situation that has a bulldog on it. Too bad you have hangups. You should have done something about those other situations as you said "some bloke" can do it or were you not that concerned. Didn't think so.

Quote:

The Dolt wrote
I have no idea what point you are trying to make.....This is not about me it is about people who feign concern for certain victims in the public domain to score political points.....Jones is no hero IMO!!!

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 11:31am:


I hope she gets the justice she deserves.....But it will not come because of Alan Jones....Defending priests and Hollingworth shows Jones double standards and lack of concern for victims.....Your loyalty is as deluded as Jones false concern for victims of sexual assault!!!

yet you make the same mistake. you only seem to want justice for her in the context of justice for someone else. It's better than nothing, but it ain't the moral high ground.

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 11:51am:


the reality of the next election is that abbott will win because he is not Gillard or Labor. That is pretty much all he needs. Some good policies will help the margin but the actual result is beyond dispute.

muso wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 11:35am:

What? Rudd and Turnbull? you go and wash your mouth out with soap ,sonny, the extreme congo line known as the far right will never allow the people of this country to choose between the two candidates they want. How dare you even suggest a couple of moderates face off.

skippy. wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 12:48pm:

Switched allegiances from Gillard to Rudd eh?

You're flogging a dead horse, none of them have the moral will to Govern, far too much corruption and shame on them I am afraid.

Gillard will not win the election unless she brings her party into line.

Leaks like "she penned her speech two weeks ago", just show a party lacking strong leadership.

She needs to hang a few out to dry.

Cant see it happening though, she doesnt have the support, but its time to put these rabble rousers down.

While Abbott is opposition leader, the only thing stopping the labor party from a 3rd term is itself. And its doing a fine job of stopping it so far.

The double standards from the lefties on here beggar belief. What's good for the left (eg, Gilard) is not okay for the right (eg, Abbott).

Frankly I think she's deserved a better run than she's had. Ultimately though it's up to her to make the best out of what she's got.

I agree with that, but the sexist assholes that run the right wing media in this country were always going to do a job on her for their "boy",phony tony.

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 10:52am:


2GutterBroadcasting? A highly credible and respected source that one! Next you'll be trying to point us to that weighty and enormously well informed blog that TheLiar failed to link to yesterday. You guys are a laugh a minute, that's for sure. 

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 11:51am:


progs has a great point though, and this is something that I (and many others) have been asking for months now: how can any word/policy be believed by Gillard with her track record of lying?

Enquiring mind wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 3:20pm:


It's not a policy though, and not something that will affect everyone like the $23 carbon tax lie.

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 2:43pm:


LW,
Do you know what generally happens when "our system" sends a small time criminal to jail?

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 3:22pm:


Lying about the reasons to invade another country is way less important than a revenue neutral tax 

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 3:22pm:


Howards was proven to be a liar and found to be so by the people!!!

Howard censured over push for war with Iraq

Prime Minister John Howard was yesterday censured by the Senate for misleading the public in his justification for sending Australia to war with Iraq.

It was only the fourth time in more than three decades a sitting prime minister has been censured and the second in Mr Howard's seven-and-a-half years in office.

The motion attacked Mr Howard for failing to adequately inform Australians that intelligence agency warnings about a war with Iraq would increase the likelihood of a terrorist attack.

It also noted that no evidence had yet been produced by Mr Howard to justify his claims that in March this year, Iraq possessed stockpiles of completed biological chemical weapons that justified going to war.

The Opposition, Greens and Australian Democrats voted together to defeat the Government by 33 votes to 30.

Greens senator Bob Brown said Mr Howard was involved in an unprecedented deceit of the nation and deserved censure.

He said Mr Howard had argued that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and support of international terrorism threatened Australia. "It has become abundantly clear that the Prime Minister was not just a bit wrong. He was totally wrong," he told parliament.

Defence Minister Robert Hill said the Australian and other governments believed Saddam Hussein's weapons programs posed a very real danger.

Opposition Senate leader John Faulkner said Mr Howard had been loose with the truth on issues of national security.

Mr Howard was censured by the Senate in March 2002 over his failure to stop Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan's attack on High Court Justice Michael Kirby.

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 3:59pm:


a senate censure is about a meaningless as you can get. it was political grandstanding and nothing more. and Howard was re-elected - something Gillard wont be doing.