For the umtenth it is NOT about reducing Temperature.I think you're splitting hairs here.
Not when you have to consistently deal with arguments like this
Quote:Credible scientist have already said publically that if the whole planet stopped polluting today, it would take over 1000 years for the whole planet to decrease by ½ degree in temperature with the amount of CO2 that’s already in the atmosphere, but the Labs don’t want hear the science.
They love to jump on that, what they wont go on to quote from these scientists is that with the CO2 already in the upper atmosphere a temperature increase of 1 to 2 degrees over this century is UNAVOIDABLE.
What they are saying is if we don't stop then with the increased CO2 it will go to 4 to 6 degress & that has massive consequences for human life on this planet.
Because if your smart you will seek out energy providers that are not effected by the tax Some people will do that anyway, but the overall impact will not be to reduce usage.
When was the aim to reduce usage????
It's to reduce usage of coal fired electricity not electricity itself.
Still working on this one.Well maybe it's because the Greens would like to see all coal mines closed. That would be great for the economy.
They have never put a time frame on this & have always said it will be transitional, as renewable power comes online creating jobs mining will wain.
I personally don't really think it will go like that but lets not try & panic the sheep with all mines are closing tomorrow.
In fact if that actually happened(as was muted with the mining tax) seeing they employ only 1% of the overall workforce we'd still have low unemployment 5.9% using the latest figures.
Let's face it, this tax is about wealth redistribution, which was tried 90 years ago and it took them 70 years to decide it didn't work. Labor is a bit slow to catch on that's all.
Again another spook the sheep argument by alluding to communism