Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9
Send Topic Print
muslim men allowed to rape wives (Read 59935 times)
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41559
Gender: male
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #75 - Jan 26th, 2009 at 9:16am
 

Well well well.
After 5 pages of people saying how they are against muslims beliefs in treating women we have Abu still saying, "it's in the koran, therefore it is right."

No surprise there. Abu, you are a human and permitted to progress past the year 500 ad.

Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52839
At my desk.
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #76 - Jan 26th, 2009 at 11:42am
 
Quote:
So you think a light smack, the same as what a child would receive is domestic violence? You're off your rocker. You might be able to push the point that it's humiliating to the lady to be treated like a child, and I agree, that's the intended purpose of it, to make her feel like a naughty child, who should grow up and stop acting immaturely. But to try and claim it is domestic violence is just ridiculous. Domestic violence actually needs to be violent, a disclipinary smack ISN'T violent, not in my definition of violence anyway.


You cannot physically discipline an adult without it being violent, especially if you are trying to discipline them for 'not behaving'. It's just not possible. It is violent subjugation.

Quote:
Can you quote me on that Mr. Ventriloquist? Or just content throwing your voice my way, as you seem to be doing with ever increasing frequency?

This time I'm not going to let it slide, provide a quote, or apologise, you've done this one time too many times now freediver, without owning up like a man and admitting your error.


Sorry. Does Islam permit marital rape?

Quote:
Yes Islam does place the husband in the position of authority in the family, and some women do have a problem with that, but there's actually a lot, surprisingly, who don't.


Likewise, in times of slavery, there are a lot of slaves who claim not to have a problem with slavery. They repeat the dominant propaganda that being fed and clothed and not having to think for yourself is a good thing and that what they give in return is fair. People tend to accept the reality they are given. But if you give those slaves and women freedom for a few years, they won't want to go back.

Quote:
She  is not a child, and she is a partner, but that doesn't mean the family should be deprived of leadership.


Yet you also claim she should be treated like a child. Partnership implies some level of equality, but under Islam the husband dominates the wife. That isn't partnership, that is servitude under physical oppression and humiliation.

Quote:
If it doesn't stop at a light smack, then it's nothing to do with Islam


Not true. An ideology that permits domestic violence but draws some kind of arbitrary line must be responsible for the inevitable crossing of that line. you cannot tell men that it is acceptable to slap their wives but expect them to take it no further. That is why our society rejects all domestic violence. That is why what Islam permits is domestic violence. That is why this fruitloop from Melbourne was encouraging his followers to break the law.

Quote:
In many relationships of course, one person does become the leader - through dominance or necessity - one being weaker than the other, but this is "usually" by mutual acceptance, although not in all cases.  When a person is dominated against their will it is abuse.   

Islam automatically gives the role of leader to the man, regardless of whether he is weak, strong, brutal or sadistic.  It is not given through natural selection as is the case in many relationships.  Although in an ideal relationship there is no leader, but a team.


Genuine teamwork does not involve leaders and followers, but leadership roles. Who is the leader at any given time depends on the situation. Thus when it comes to cooking, one partner may take charge, when it comes to finances, the other might, and so on. This happens naturally. This is the opposite of the institutionalisation of men as the dominant partner in a relationship. Islam basically cedes its authority to the barbarity of brute strength.

Quote:
If my partner or husband had done similar when I "misbehaved", no doubt I would have been enraged at not only the humiliation but because he used his physical strength to exert dominance and control over me.


Exactly. That sort of thing is an abusive relationship between adults. There is no other spin you can place on it. It uses brute force and humiliation to put women in their place.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gaybriel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1191
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #77 - Jan 27th, 2009 at 1:05pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 23rd, 2009 at 12:50pm:
What's the definition of Islamophobia?


it's just a more specific way of discussing discrimination against muslims, also the effects of fear that have occurred most specifically since 9/11 but also before in regards to islam- it formed around the time that there occurred what many would call a 'moral panic' in regards to islam and muslims

a lot of people dislike using the word 'racism' to describe discrimination against muslims (as seen here) so the word islamaphobia is a kind of substitute.

the word itself has its drawbacks (something I'll probably also look at)- as it connotes the idea of an irrational fear- whilst in some cases this is true, people do have an irrational fear of islam- some do not fear it all and just hate it, some don't hate it but disagree with it etc

like any label or descriptor it tends to obliterate shades of grey which is why in my study I would analyse the term- discussing its pros and cons etc etc
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gaybriel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1191
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #78 - Jan 27th, 2009 at 1:07pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 23rd, 2009 at 2:06pm:
I wonder if 'all other avenues' includes divorce?


I believe said 'tap' is supposed to be an indicator of 'we're now heading towards divorce'
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41559
Gender: male
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #79 - Jan 27th, 2009 at 1:18pm
 
gaybriel - how ludicrous.
Whsat idiots do you take us for ??

when in islam women canot drive or venture outside without appropriate male supervision, women are 2nd class citizens at best.

a tap means "its the sword for you next time"

Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #80 - Jan 27th, 2009 at 1:23pm
 
You can't be racist against a religion, especially one where many races are part of it. 

Considering ABU claims that Muslim women are know to use pots and pans against their men do you suppose a "tap" of any variety is appropriate?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gaybriel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1191
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #81 - Jan 27th, 2009 at 2:09pm
 
I believe I've expressed my views about it several times before

sprint- I never said I subscribed to that belief now did I- I just said what I know of this issue

grendel- yes like I said many people don't like the use of the term racism when talking about religion hence why terms like antisemitism, islamaphobia etc are used
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52839
At my desk.
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #82 - Jan 27th, 2009 at 2:33pm
 
Quote:
Considering ABU claims that Muslim women are know to use pots and pans against their men do you suppose a "tap" of any variety is appropriate?


I think it's a natural response to the husband beating them with a soggy saliva soaked miswak. If someone did that to me I can't imagine I'd respond very nicely. It's like spitting on someone and punching them at the same time.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #83 - Jan 27th, 2009 at 2:37pm
 
Well the term racism is incorrect, wrong, inappropriate...  etc, etc, etc...  if one uses English one should use it correctly.  Perhaps "dislike" is not why people use other terms...  perhaps proper usage is.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gaybriel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1191
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #84 - Jan 27th, 2009 at 3:04pm
 
well they dislike it because they believe it not to be proper usage

I'm not looking to reignite the debate over this terminology- I'm just recognising the fact that people have a problem with using the term racism when it cmes to religion
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #85 - Jan 27th, 2009 at 3:08pm
 
No...  they know it is NOT THE PROPER USE...   Smiley

Dont use it re religion...  it's inappropriate and probably 100% of the time wrong.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 7584
Gender: male
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #86 - Jan 27th, 2009 at 3:14pm
 
May be muslim women like to be raped because they don't have enough of it wit all the koranic polygamy's going on in their sub society?
Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52839
At my desk.
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #87 - Jan 27th, 2009 at 3:32pm
 
Gaybriel rather than attributing your avoidance of the term to people's 'bad reaction' to it, you should attribute it to the fact that it is simply the wrong term to use. This is especially true for an academic publication where "but you know what I meant to say" just doesn't cut it. You are confusing awareness of incorrect usage of the term with an actual change in the term's meaning. If you look at any word closely enough you will find incorrect usage. This doesn't mean the meaning of every single word is undergoing rapid change in many directions. That would defeat the purpose of language. It merely means that words do get used incorrectly. Correcting such incorrect use is critical to maintaining a language to the extent that communication remains effective.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gaybriel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1191
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #88 - Jan 27th, 2009 at 5:52pm
 
FD- you know what there is an entire thread on this where I have discussed why I don't feel it is an incorrect usage but rather one of the many wys in which language has evolved.

you're not willing to accept that and that is fine- but please don't sit there and reiterate the same crap over and over and over- it's just boring

I could quote a million passages from shakespeare and give you examples of words and phrases that have changed since their original meaning as used by him (and seeing as he invented half the words I think we can take that as truth)- but you dont go around weeing your pants about those. language changes. sure, words may be misapplied originally but this does not invalidate their usage in common society from then on.

you say it would defeat the purpose of language- but the very NATURE of language is that it is constantly evolving and constantly changing.

I know where you stand, you know where I stand. we don't agree. wonderful- let's leave it at that

however, please don't sit there and lecture me on what an academic publication should and should not be like. I am well aware of the criteria but if you think I am going to sit here and write out my entire mother *&(*ing thesis for some anonymous people on the internet then you are kidding yourself

I do not avoid the term as a matter of fact- I actually do use it, I just also use the term islamaphobia.

I see islamaphobia as almost a subcategory of racism (as I have explained my definition of racism before)- hence my use of the descriptor is to communicate more effectively the specificity of my phd topic.

do not condescend to me and pretend like I would actually write something akin to"but you know what I mean" in my thesis.

and no I should not attribute something to something else - IF I DON'T ACTUALLY BELIEVE THAT TO BE TRUE

respect that I have a different opinion even if you don't agree with it- but for the love of everything holy do not sit there and presume that you can condescend to me and tell me what is required of me in my degree.

got it?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gaybriel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1191
Re: muslim men allowed to rape wives
Reply #89 - Jan 27th, 2009 at 5:54pm
 
tallowood wrote on Jan 27th, 2009 at 3:14pm:
May be muslim women like to be raped because they don't have enough of it wit all the koranic polygamy's going on in their sub society?


no woman likes to be raped by the very definition of rape. what an incredibly filthy and inhumane thing to say. shame on you
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9
Send Topic Print