The Comparison of Mean IQ in Muslim and Non-Muslim Countries
Donald I. Templer

Abstract

The present research found that the Muslim country mean IQ of 81 is half a standard deviation below the mean IQ of non-Muslim nations and is not related to strength of Muslim culture as defined by the percentage of Muslims in the country. The mean IQ of 84 in Arab countries is not associated with per capita income and is incompatible with the intellectual achievements of the golden age of the Muslim Empire. Possible explanations for this decline include hybridization with sub-Saharan Africans, dysgenic decrease in the more educated Muslims employing birth control as suggested by Meisenberg, the Muslim religion not fostering critical thinking, and the intellectual contributions being both exaggerated and made by non-Muslims.

http://donalditempler.com/assets/templer_8.pdf



Given the mean IQ is 81 highlights the problems of communication, learning ability and ability for rational reason. Bear that in mind when conversing or getting one too upset.

At a guess I'd say the mean IQ of the muslim apologist would be around 81 as well or possibly less.

So as a rule of thumb  when conversing with muslims or apologists keep it simple.

"Muslim's have a mean IQ of 81"

Still more than James and Mr Hammer combined.

Noam Chomsky:


"Surely people differ in their biologically determined qualities. The world would be too horrible to contemplate if they did not. But discovery of a correlation between some of these qualities is of no scientific interest and of no social significance, except to racists, sexists and the like. Those who argue that there is a correlation between race and IQ and those who deny this claim are contributing to racism and other disorders, because what they are saying is based on the assumption that the answer to the question makes a difference; it does not, except to racists, sexists and the like."


Is Chomsky saying that intelligence makes no difference? But if intelligence is important, why does it not matter how it is distributed between populations?


Why doesn't the discovery of correlation between some qualities matter, scientifically or socially?

Inbreeding is the cause!

Donald Templer. A known racialist. Widely discredited by his peers.


With Concerns about Darwinist Racialism in Mind, National Review Cleans House

"It was a conference held by a white racialist group, American Renaissance, last month in Tennessee. You can click on this link and see some of the participants. As Rich noted, Weissberg had turned up at the meeting to discuss strategies for successfully "repackaging" white nationalism. Needless to say, once someone has descended to such garbage, you can't have him around anymore.

Beyond that, Weissberg himself isn't terribly interesting -- but a look at the American Renaissance website does offer a reminder of the key role that Darwinian thinking continues to play among a fringe of racialist pseudo-conservatives.

The 2012 conference, as I said, leaned heavily on this theme. Leading the program was eugenics advocate Richard Lynn. The American Renaissance site helpfully gives us the gist of his presentation.

He briefly summarizes the field of eugenics since Francis Galton coined the term in 1883, noting that the West has now had six generations of dysgenic fertility that has led to a decline in genetic IQ of about one point per generation. Improvements in nutrition have increased tested IQ, thus masking the genetic decline, but this is a one-time environmental boost that has run its course. Eugenics is the obvious solution, but it is notoriously difficult to accomplish. If we in the West do not have the will to stop dysgenic reproduction or dysgenic immigration, Prof. Lynn predicts "the torch of civilization will pass from the Europeans to the Chinese."
There was someone called Donald Templer on "The Geographic Distribution of Intelligence: Evolution, Migration and Dysgenics." Templer specializes in "race and intelligence, and racial brain shape."
There was a French visitor, Guillaume Faye with his "charmingly accented English," praising "the biological substrate" that gives hope for "world-wide white racial consciousness."

http://www.evolutionnews.org/2012/04/with_concerns_a058711.html

Do muslims read the Koran more than Christians read the bible ?

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 5:56pm:


Sorry James, I agree with hammer

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 6:25pm:


No not that bitch!

The one with a big fat arse and a dope for a son!