freediver wrote on Aug 9
th, 2011 at 5:30pm:
I just can't be bothered Maqqa. It's got nothing to do with what Gillard says or thinks. I was promoting carbon taxes a decade before her.
You contradict yourself at every turn. You suggest there is an answer then construct and absurd conspiracy to explain why no-one will tell you what it is. Has it ever occurred to you to figure it out for yourself?
Conspiracy?
I didn't come up with the claim that carbon dioxide is solely responsible for global warming
It was the left that came up with this theory then called demonised anyone who questioned them
Once again - you cannot answer my question even though you claim there are plenty of ways to get the answer
If so - it should be quiet easy for you to do so
You won't admit it because it means you will have to admit the basis of AGW is all circumstantial evidence
And your "I just can't be bothered" answer is a cop out
I am not surprised that you have not asked why would my answer be relevant to the AGW discussion!
If you did then I will have to expose this fraud even further
People are acting based on moral obligation rather than scientific evidence
Maqqa, if your ignorant that is not anyones fault but your own: you could try chewing up the internets total address space and no one would care how ignorant you are as its your problem and yo either fix it or you don't!