Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 17
Send Topic Print
One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power (Read 6482 times)
whiteknight
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9502
melbourne
Gender: male
One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Oct 4th, 2026 at 10:04am
 
[color=#ff00ff][/color]One Nation commits to coal-fired power at Gippsland's Loy Yang and lifting Victoria's nuclear ban   Sad

ABC News
Posted 31 Aug 2026

In short:
One Nation has pledged to keep coal-fired power running in Victoria, along with lifting the ban on nuclear energy, if elected at the upcoming November state election.   Sad

The party announced its energy policies at Gippsland's Loy Yang power station, which is set to close by 2035.

What's next?
Energy experts have reacted to the policy announcements, citing cost as a main barrier to nuclear in Australia.


One Nation has promised to keep Victoria's largest coal plant running and lift the ban on nuclear energy if it is successful at November's state election.

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson and state leader Warren Pickering today travelled to the Latrobe Valley, east of Melbourne, to announce the party's Victorian energy policy.

The pair made the announcement at the Loy Yang A power station, which Mr Pickering said the party would not allow to close in 2035 as planned.

Group of people standing in front of microphones with green hills in the background.
Warren Pickering and Pauline Hanson announce a suite of energy policies in the Latrobe Valley.

The party blames the decline of coal on government policy, which it says has discouraged plant owners from conducting maintenance.

Mr Pickering conceded the party had not spoken to Loy Yang A's owner about keeping the plant open or whether it would cost the state government to keep it open.

"Those figures haven't been discussed just yet," Mr Pickering said.

"The intent would be to encourage the industry through industry future security to tip into the capital expenditure required themselves."

Mr Pickering said One Nation would move to scrap Victoria's 1983 ban on building nuclear power if it won government.   Sad

"Victorians deserve an opportunity to partake in the future of nuclear technology," Mr Pickering said.

"Whether that be through new technological innovations in thorium nuclear micro-reactor technology or in accordance with our federal policy position to develop a nuclear facility on the eastern seaboard with Victoria being a beneficiary."

Man and a woman standing against a backdrop of green rolling hills and a power plant station.
One Nation candidate for Narracan Ben Lucas and Pauline Hanson at Loy Yang power station.

Voters will be offered very different energy policies when they head to the polls in November, with the Coalition and One Nation critical of Labor's renewables rollout.

One Nation has also pledged to scrap renewable energy zones (REZs) in the state's west and a coastal zone for offshore wind and abandon Victoria's commitment to net zero emissions.

A spokesperson for Loy Yang operator AGL said it was aware of One Nation's policy announcement and reiterated the planned closure date for Loy Yang A in 2035.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
whiteknight
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9502
melbourne
Gender: male
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #1 - Oct 4th, 2026 at 10:07am
 
We don't want nuclear power in Australia.   Sad
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


In your damn fate

Posts: 26710
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #2 - Oct 4th, 2026 at 11:41am
 
whiteknight wrote on Oct 4th, 2026 at 10:07am:
We don't want nuclear power in Australia.   Sad


We somewhat do. Especially those people that want to see pollution levels cut.
Back to top
 

There are no rules here. Welcome to the slaughterhouse.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 21788
Gender: male
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #3 - Oct 4th, 2026 at 1:01pm
 
whiteknight wrote on Oct 4th, 2026 at 10:07am:
We don't want nuclear power in Australia. 


You also don't want fossil fuel power.  As someone wrote in this morning's paper here.

"The sun and wind give us permanent energy and independence".

Obviously she has never seen the sun dim because of clouds or nighttime and never seen the wind stopped blowing. How is that for independence?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6181
Gender: male
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #4 - Oct 4th, 2026 at 1:04pm
 
whiteknight wrote on Oct 4th, 2026 at 10:07am:
We don't want nuclear power in Australia.   Sad


Yes we do.  Smiley
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Hung Uncut Black Muslim Jew
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1420
Gender: male
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #5 - Oct 4th, 2026 at 1:40pm
 
One Nation just sent new voter support to the currently 14% Victorian Greens. Nice.
Back to top
 

Racist and Apartheid Zionism is a settler-colonial and ethnonationalist ideology, that privileges one ethnic group at the expense of all others.

Ban it in Australia
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53512
At my desk.
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #6 - Oct 7th, 2026 at 1:35pm
 
Were the Liberals going to build nuclear plants without lifting the ban?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grappler Racist Filth
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 90955
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #7 - Oct 7th, 2026 at 5:00pm
 
Well - 'AI' skirts around the question of what the final cost of installing 'renewables' is for Australia ... just evading the real question of total cost to install and get running...  funny how that works to suit New City Hall...

https://smartenergy.org.au/nuclear-fallout-116-600-billion-to-build-7-nuclear-re...

On the other hand '$116-600B' to build seven nuclear reactor stations...

"This is the same cost as delivering 82% renewables by 2030, and an almost 100% renewable energy mix by 2050, including the cost of building all of the enabling transmission infrastructure."

Then we take into account the need to renew 'renewables' every twenty years - while a nuke is worth seventy years or so, so let's reduce that cost by dividing it by three.... so the top price for nukes across the lifespan is $200Bn over the same twenty year span which incurs massive cost of replacement and repair from 'renewables'  ...

How much has been spent to date on 'renewables?  City Hall likes to say small figures that do not relate to total costs... which, like nuclear, must include upgrades to grid etc required....
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 7th, 2026 at 10:04pm by Grappler Racist Filth »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53512
At my desk.
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #8 - Oct 7th, 2026 at 7:30pm
 
Quote:
Well - 'AI' skirts around the question of what the final cost of installing 'renewables' is for Australia


There is a good page about it on wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levelized_cost_of_electricity

...
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 21788
Gender: male
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #9 - Oct 9th, 2026 at 2:58pm
 
freediver wrote on Oct 7th, 2026 at 7:30pm:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levelized_cost_of_electricity


The levelised cost of  electricity is flawed. it doesn't show the levelised full cost of electricity. The levelised full cost includes transmission, storage and subsidies etc. Cool
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 156667
Gender: male
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #10 - Oct 9th, 2026 at 3:31pm
 
lee wrote on Oct 4th, 2026 at 1:01pm:
whiteknight wrote on Oct 4th, 2026 at 10:07am:
We don't want nuclear power in Australia. 


You also don't want fossil fuel power.  As someone wrote in this morning's paper here.

"The sun and wind give us permanent energy and independence".

Obviously she has never seen the sun dim because of clouds or nighttime and never seen the wind stopped blowing. How is that for independence?


You're confusing 'permanent' and 'constant'.

Permanent means something lasts for a long time or forever without changing its state. Constant means something happens over and over again without stopping, or stays at the same level or value over time.

The sun and wind, while maybe not constant, are indeed permanent.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Racist Filth
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 90955
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #11 - Oct 9th, 2026 at 4:58pm
 
Nukes are the way to go...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 21788
Gender: male
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #12 - Oct 9th, 2026 at 5:22pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2026 at 3:31pm:
ou're confusing 'permanent' and 'constant'.

Permanent means something lasts for a long time or forever without changing its state.



You mean like wind turbines failing and solar panels dying? Cool
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53512
At my desk.
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #13 - Oct 9th, 2026 at 5:26pm
 
lee wrote on Oct 9th, 2026 at 2:58pm:
freediver wrote on Oct 7th, 2026 at 7:30pm:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levelized_cost_of_electricity


The levelised cost of  electricity is flawed. it doesn't show the levelised full cost of electricity. The levelised full cost includes transmission, storage and subsidies etc. Cool


The levelised cost includes subsidies, if you include them.

Renewables are still cheaper, even when you add the cost of storage. This has also been pointed out to you before. They are also trending down, while coal and nuclear are trending up. So the gap will only get wider.

Transmission costs tend to be cheaper for renewables as they are both more distributed and better placed. For example rooftop solar is often produced in the same location it is consumed, meaning no load on the grid. You can't put a coal or nuclear fired power station in the suburbs. The distributed battery storage also eases loads on the grid.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 21788
Gender: male
Re: One Nation Would Lift The Ban On Nuclear Power
Reply #14 - Oct 9th, 2026 at 5:35pm
 
freediver wrote on Oct 9th, 2026 at 5:26pm:
The levelised cost includes subsidies, if you include them.



And the CSIRO NextGen report specifically excludes them.

freediver wrote on Oct 9th, 2026 at 5:26pm:
Renewables are still cheaper, even when you add the cost of storage. This has also been pointed out to you before. They are also trending down, while coal and nuclear are trending up. So the gap will only get wider.

Transmission costs tend to be cheaper for renewables as they are both more distributed and better placed. For example rooftop solar is often produced in the same location




The cost of storage and the cost of transmission etc have to be both added. Not one or the other.

Now that China has stopped trying to control lithiium prices are heading back up.

https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/lithium

Transmission from solar farms and Wind turbine farm farms tend to be remote, Distributed from remote areas is not cheap.

Rooftop solar needs local grid upgrades.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 17
Send Topic Print