Australian Politics Forum - Noem's husband is cross dresser

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 151595
Gender: male

Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser
Reply #30 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 7:21am

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 8:42am:

Also, who leaked this? Trump? Miller?

Now we know with 100% certainty that it was Trump who released the photos.

Trump told the Daily Mail he did not know about the photos and was surprised the Noem family confirmed their authenticity.

"They confirmed it? Wow, well, I feel badly for the family if that's the case, that's too bad," Trump told the outlet. "I haven't seen anything. I don't know anything about it. That's too bad, but I just know nothing about it."

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 57682 Gender:	Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser Reply #31 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm So is he a dirty pervert - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

SadKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

Not sad, just paying attention
to how cooked it is

Posts: 22118
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser
Reply #32 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:54pm

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm:

So is he a dirty pervert - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman?

Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people.

What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy.

You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me.

And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense.

That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do.

You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it.

And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny.

So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 57682
Gender: male

Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser
Reply #33 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 1:21pm

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:54pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm:

So is he a dirty pervert - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman?

Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people.

What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy.

You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me.

And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense.

That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do.

You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it.

And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny.

So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it.

Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities?

I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas.

Why?

Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another.

Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous. And hypocritical - that goes without saying.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 151595
Gender: male

Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser
Reply #34 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 2:01pm

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm:

So is he a dirty pervert - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman?

Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

Nobody hates him, Frank.

Nobody cares what he does in his private life, as long as it's legal.

If he wants to dress up as a woman, that's fine. Good luck to him.

The problem here is his repugnant wife.

She pretends to be a Christian and tells everyone that they should live the way she (and the GOP) tells them to.

The Republicans look down at homosexuals, trans, cross-dressers, etc.

They express hatred for the LBGT community.

They make laws that discriminate against them.

Yet when one of their own is found out to be a part of the LGBT community they demand prayers and privacy.

It's about hypocrisy, Frank.

If Botox Barbie's husband wants to wear fake boobs, that's perfectly okay.

His repugnant adulteress wife (and her party), however, should not criticise others for similar behaviour.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 41483 Gender:	Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser Reply #35 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 2:46pm trumps cultists are keen to hide away child rapists but cannot stand a man wearing a dress.
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 57682
Gender: male

Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser
Reply #36 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 2:59pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 2:01pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm:

So is he a dirty pervert - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman?

Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

Nobody hates him, Frank.

Nobody cares what he does in his private life, as long as it's legal.

If he wants to dress up as a woman, that's fine. Good luck to him.

The problem here is his repugnant wife.

She pretends to be a Christian and tells everyone that they should live the way she (and the GOP) tells them to.

The Republicans look down at homosexuals, trans, cross-dressers, etc.

They express hatred for the LBGT community.

They make laws that discriminate against them.

Yet when one of their own is found out to be a part of the LGBT community they demand prayers and privacy.

It's about hypocrisy, Frank.

If Botox Barbie's husband wants to wear fake boobs, that's perfectly okay.

His repugnant adulteress wife (and her party), however, should not criticise others for similar behaviour.

Did his wife dress him??

How is she responsible for his perversions?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

SadKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

Not sad, just paying attention
to how cooked it is

Posts: 22118
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser
Reply #37 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:23pm

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 1:21pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:54pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm:

So is he a dirty pervert - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman?

Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people.

What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy.

You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me.

And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense.

That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do.

You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it.

And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny.

So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it.

Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities?

I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas.

Why?

Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another.

Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous. And hypocritical - that goes without saying.

The real issue here isn't the cross-dressing, that's a complete distraction and, frankly, nobody serious cares about it.

The concern is the national security risk. Reports indicate he was operating in online communities where he spent tens of thousands of dollars on models, with some allegedly becoming aware of his identity and leveraging that for financial pressure. Whether that rises to outright extortion or not, it is precisely the kind of compromised position that security vetting is designed to detect and prevent.

This is why dismantling rigorous background checks and vetting processes is so reckless. Those systems exist to identify vulnerabilities, financial, personal, or behavioural, that could be exploited by hostile actors. Removing them doesn't eliminate risk, it institutionalises it.

And that's the part MAGA and Trump supporters consistently ignore. They posture endlessly about national security, but when faced with a clear example of an avoidable vulnerability within their own ranks, they suddenly lose all interest.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 57682
Gender: male

Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser
Reply #38 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:38pm

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:23pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 1:21pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:54pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm:

So is he a dirty pervert - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman?

Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people.

What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy.

You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me.

And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense.

That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do.

You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it.

And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny.

So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it.

Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities?

I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas.

Why?

Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another.

Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous. And hypocritical - that goes without saying.

The real issue here isn't the cross-dressing, that's a complete distraction and, frankly, nobody serious cares about it.

The concern is the national security risk. Reports indicate he was operating in online communities where he spent tens of thousands of dollars on models, with some allegedly becoming aware of his identity and leveraging that for financial pressure. Whether that rises to outright extortion or not, it is precisely the kind of compromised position that security vetting is designed to detect and prevent.

This is why dismantling rigorous background checks and vetting processes is so reckless. Those systems exist to identify vulnerabilities, financial, personal, or behavioural, that could be exploited by hostile actors. Removing them doesn't eliminate risk, it institutionalises it.

And that's the part MAGA and Trump supporters consistently ignore. They posture endlessly about national security, but when faced with a clear example of an avoidable vulnerability within their own ranks, they suddenly lose all interest.

This is a new angle. None of the creeps on this thread had any interest in it, they just all went full grimacing moron on the topic.

Noem has been a governor. Before that, congresswoman. Before that State rep. At which point in her near-20 year public carer has she been inadequatly screened. Just now that Trump appointed her, a state governor?

Was the bloke not cross dressing while the was a governor during Biden's presidency?

Blaming EVERYTHING on Trump is a deranged idiocy, it weakens any legitimate criticism.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

SadKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

Not sad, just paying attention
to how cooked it is

Posts: 22118
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser
Reply #39 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:45pm

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:38pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:23pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 1:21pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:54pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm:

So is he a dirty pervert - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman?

Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people.

What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy.

You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me.

And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense.

That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do.

You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it.

And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny.

So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it.

Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities?

I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas.

Why?

Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another.

Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous. And hypocritical - that goes without saying.

The real issue here isn't the cross-dressing, that's a complete distraction and, frankly, nobody serious cares about it.

The concern is the national security risk. Reports indicate he was operating in online communities where he spent tens of thousands of dollars on models, with some allegedly becoming aware of his identity and leveraging that for financial pressure. Whether that rises to outright extortion or not, it is precisely the kind of compromised position that security vetting is designed to detect and prevent.

This is why dismantling rigorous background checks and vetting processes is so reckless. Those systems exist to identify vulnerabilities, financial, personal, or behavioural, that could be exploited by hostile actors. Removing them doesn't eliminate risk, it institutionalises it.

And that's the part MAGA and Trump supporters consistently ignore. They posture endlessly about national security, but when faced with a clear example of an avoidable vulnerability within their own ranks, they suddenly lose all interest.

This is a new angle. None of the creeps on this thread had any interest in it, they just all went full grimacing moron on the topic.

Noem has been a governor. Before that, congresswoman. Before that State rep. At which point in her near-20 year public carer has she been inadequatly screened. Just now that Trump appointed her, a state governor?

Was the bloke not cross dressing while the was a governor during Biden's presidency?

Blaming EVERYTHING on Trump is a deranged idiocy, it weakens any legitimate criticism.

MAGA are STILL blaming everything on Biden or Obama. Get your own house in order before you have a sook about the left.

Especially when the vast majority of the flak Trump gets is because of his own actions or the outcomes of his policies.

Unless you want us to go back to your mental health retreat where everything is rebranded, even reality, to match the safe space required to be an unquestioning MAGA sheep...?

Back to top

IP Logged

Big Donger

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101826

Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser
Reply #40 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 5:40pm

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 8:46pm:

Upon reflection, I realized that he is not a cross-dresser. That's pure fetish.

I had no idea these people were grandparents. Can you imagine?

Noem has bad skin.

So does Gordon, Proud Gay.

I wonder if he's married to a closet trannie.

They could compare dick pics, no?

Back to top

IP Logged

Big Donger

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101826

Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser
Reply #41 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 5:51pm

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 1:21pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:54pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm:

So is he a dirty pervert - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman?

Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people.

What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy.

You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me.

And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense.

That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do.

You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it.

And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny.

So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it.

Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities?

I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas.

Why?

Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another.

Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous. And hypocritical - that goes without saying.

Good to see you championing trans rights, dear boy. I could not agree more.

Kristi's hubby should be free to identify as a hot chick and use the powder room of her choice.

And you have to use her preferred pronouns.

Say it.

Back to top

IP Logged

Big Donger

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101826

Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser
Reply #42 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 5:53pm

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 2:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 2:01pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm:

So is he a dirty pervert - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman?

Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

Nobody hates him, Frank.

Nobody cares what he does in his private life, as long as it's legal.

If he wants to dress up as a woman, that's fine. Good luck to him.

The problem here is his repugnant wife.

She pretends to be a Christian and tells everyone that they should live the way she (and the GOP) tells them to.

The Republicans look down at homosexuals, trans, cross-dressers, etc.

They express hatred for the LBGT community.

They make laws that discriminate against them.

Yet when one of their own is found out to be a part of the LGBT community they demand prayers and privacy.

It's about hypocrisy, Frank.

If Botox Barbie's husband wants to wear fake boobs, that's perfectly okay.

His repugnant adulteress wife (and her party), however, should not criticise others for similar behaviour.

Did his wife dress him??

How is she responsible for his perversions?

What?

Back to top

IP Logged

Big Donger

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101826

Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser
Reply #43 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 5:58pm

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:45pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:38pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:23pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 1:21pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:54pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm:

So is he a dirty pervert - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman?

Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people.

What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy.

You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me.

And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense.

That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do.

You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it.

And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny.

So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it.

Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities?

I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas.

Why?

Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another.

Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous. And hypocritical - that goes without saying.

The real issue here isn't the cross-dressing, that's a complete distraction and, frankly, nobody serious cares about it.

The concern is the national security risk. Reports indicate he was operating in online communities where he spent tens of thousands of dollars on models, with some allegedly becoming aware of his identity and leveraging that for financial pressure. Whether that rises to outright extortion or not, it is precisely the kind of compromised position that security vetting is designed to detect and prevent.

This is why dismantling rigorous background checks and vetting processes is so reckless. Those systems exist to identify vulnerabilities, financial, personal, or behavioural, that could be exploited by hostile actors. Removing them doesn't eliminate risk, it institutionalises it.

And that's the part MAGA and Trump supporters consistently ignore. They posture endlessly about national security, but when faced with a clear example of an avoidable vulnerability within their own ranks, they suddenly lose all interest.

This is a new angle. None of the creeps on this thread had any interest in it, they just all went full grimacing moron on the topic.

Noem has been a governor. Before that, congresswoman. Before that State rep. At which point in her near-20 year public carer has she been inadequatly screened. Just now that Trump appointed her, a state governor?

Was the bloke not cross dressing while the was a governor during Biden's presidency?

Blaming EVERYTHING on Trump is a deranged idiocy, it weakens any legitimate criticism.

MAGA are STILL blaming everything on Biden or Obama. Get your own house in order before you have a sook about the left.

Especially when the vast majority of the flak Trump gets is because of his own actions or the outcomes of his policies.

Unless you want us to go back to your mental health retreat where everything is rebranded, even reality, to match the safe space required to be an unquestioning MAGA sheep...?

Excuse I, Sad, that's unfair.

Fran has repeatedly warned you to go back to his mental health retreat where everything is rebranded, even reality, to match the safe space required to be an unquestioning MAGA sheep.

It's not too much to ask, shurely.

Back to top

IP Logged

Big Donger

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101826

Re: Noem's husband is cross dresser
Reply #44 - Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 6:02pm

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:38pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:23pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 1:21pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:54pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm:

So is he a dirty pervert - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman?

Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people.

What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy.

You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me.

And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense.

That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do.

You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it.

And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny.

So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it.

Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities?

I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas.

Why?

Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another.

Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous. And hypocritical - that goes without saying.

The real issue here isn't the cross-dressing, that's a complete distraction and, frankly, nobody serious cares about it.

The concern is the national security risk. Reports indicate he was operating in online communities where he spent tens of thousands of dollars on models, with some allegedly becoming aware of his identity and leveraging that for financial pressure. Whether that rises to outright extortion or not, it is precisely the kind of compromised position that security vetting is designed to detect and prevent.

This is why dismantling rigorous background checks and vetting processes is so reckless. Those systems exist to identify vulnerabilities, financial, personal, or behavioural, that could be exploited by hostile actors. Removing them doesn't eliminate risk, it institutionalises it.

And that's the part MAGA and Trump supporters consistently ignore. They posture endlessly about national security, but when faced with a clear example of an avoidable vulnerability within their own ranks, they suddenly lose all interest.

This is a new angle. None of the creeps on this thread had any interest in it, they just all went full grimacing moron on the topic.

Noem has been a governor. Before that, congresswoman. Before that State rep. At which point in her near-20 year public carer has she been inadequatly screened. Just now that Trump appointed her, a state governor?

Was the bloke not cross dressing while the was a governor during Biden's presidency?

He's right, Sad. Why weren't you people posting about Kristi's hubby when Sleepy Joe was prez?

Trust the leftards.

SO UNFAIR !!!

Back to top

IP Logged