Australian Politics Forum - U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 56868 Gender:	Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL Reply #45 - Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 7:57pm Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local pays the tariff. That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff. It's not complicated.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

chimera Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 14877 Armidale Gender:	Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL Reply #46 - Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 7:58pm Neither is Trump. Or Frank.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 150480 Gender:	Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL Reply #47 - Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 7:59pm Frank wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 7:57pm: Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local pays the tariff. That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff. It's not complicated. a) or b) ? Come on - you can say it.
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56868
Gender: male

Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Reply #48 - Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 9:05pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 7:59pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 7:57pm:

Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local pays the tariff. That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.

It's not complicated.

a) or b) ?

Come on - you can say it.

Which bit of the highlighted is totally beyond your comprehension, uneducated, bogan creepy bozo?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101038

Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Reply #49 - Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 9:36pm

Frank wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 6:50pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 6:46pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 5:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 9:37am:

Frank wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 7:03am:

Marla wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21^st, 2026 at 8:27pm:

Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.

Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.

Good to know, Deidre.

President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.

Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.

Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local. That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.

It's not complicated.

So hilarious to see the old boy continuing to bang on about tariffs.

We're about to see his DL turn 180%. You'll see, by the end of this year, DL will be complaining about Sleepy Joe sticking tariffs on everything and how DESPICABLE they are.

The old boy will then say that. Today? Not so much. Tomorrow?

SO UNFAIR !!!

You remind me of the Obamas in that Trump clip.

They edited out the shittrowing derangement bits. But you bring it to us.

And you remind me of someone who once hated tariffs.

Despicable stuff.

SO UNFAIR !!!

Back to top

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 41307 Gender:	Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL Reply #50 - Yesterday at 3:27pm If trump cannot accept a 'NO' from the Supreme Court in from of the whole world, what would he do to a scared girl in a private room when she says 'no'
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 55458 Gender:	Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL Reply #51 - Yesterday at 3:30pm A Supreme Court still adhering to archaic Westernism from mainland Europe. Not very American of them at all.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56868
Gender: male

Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Reply #52 - Yesterday at 3:30pm

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 9:36pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 6:50pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 6:46pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 5:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 9:37am:

Frank wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 7:03am:

Marla wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21^st, 2026 at 8:27pm:

Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.

Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.

Good to know, Deidre.

President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.

Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.

Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local. That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.

It's not complicated.

So hilarious to see the old boy continuing to bang on about tariffs.

We're about to see his DL turn 180%. You'll see, by the end of this year, DL will be complaining about Sleepy Joe sticking tariffs on everything and how DESPICABLE they are.

The old boy will then say that. Today? Not so much. Tomorrow?

SO UNFAIR !!!

You remind me of the Obamas in that Trump clip.

They edited out the shittrowing derangement bits. But you bring it to us.

And you remind me of someone who once hated tariffs.

Despicable stuff.

SO UNFAIR !!!

Your memory, like much else about you, is ****ed beyond repair, trouser sniffer.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 150480
Gender: male

Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Reply #53 - Yesterday at 3:33pm

Sprintcyclist wrote Yesterday at 3:27pm:

If trump cannot accept a 'NO' from the Supreme Court in front of the whole world, what would he do to a scared girl in a private room when she says 'no'

I think we already know the answer to that.

5. Defendant Trump had sexual contact with me at four different parties in the summer of 1994.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied me to a bed,
exposed himself to me, and then proceeded to forcibly rape me. During the course of this savage sexual
attack, I loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but he did not. Defendant Trump responded to
my pleas by violently striking me in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do
whatever he wanted.

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/jane-doe-affidavit.pdf

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 55458 Gender:	Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL Reply #54 - Yesterday at 3:42pm Gwoggy has a huge TV in his living room. It's like a Holy Shrine dedicated to his faith to the Media God from America. A Media still trying to rule Politics like a Musician out of his depth.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101038

Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Reply #55 - Yesterday at 4:37pm

Frank wrote Yesterday at 3:30pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 9:36pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 6:50pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 6:46pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 5:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 9:37am:

Frank wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 7:03am:

Marla wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21^st, 2026 at 8:27pm:

Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.

Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.

Good to know, Deidre.

President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.

Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.

Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local. That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.

It's not complicated.

So hilarious to see the old boy continuing to bang on about tariffs.

We're about to see his DL turn 180%. You'll see, by the end of this year, DL will be complaining about Sleepy Joe sticking tariffs on everything and how DESPICABLE they are.

The old boy will then say that. Today? Not so much. Tomorrow?

SO UNFAIR !!!

You remind me of the Obamas in that Trump clip.

They edited out the shittrowing derangement bits. But you bring it to us.

And you remind me of someone who once hated tariffs.

Despicable stuff.

SO UNFAIR !!!

Your memory, like much else about you, is ****ed beyond repair, trouser sniffer.

No no, dear boy, we distinctly remember.

Tariffs! You shrieked. Dessssspicable! Boo! Hiss!

So I'm curious. Whatever made you change your mind?

Back to top

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101038

Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Reply #56 - Yesterday at 4:45pm

Sprintcyclist wrote Yesterday at 3:27pm:

If trump cannot accept a 'NO' from the Supreme Court in from of the whole world, what would he do to a scared girl in a private room when she says 'no'

Come come, Sprint, I think we all know the answer to this.

I'm sure his old buddy Jeff would have responded in the negative too. No no, he would have said to the hangman, I've been put up for a pardon. You talk to DL.

Oh, they would have chuckled, we already have!

And that, as they say, was that.

That's the Superior Man for you, Sprint.

A bit of this, that, and a little bit of somethin' else, no?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Yesterday at 5:14pm by Melanias purse »

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56868
Gender: male

Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Reply #57 - Yesterday at 5:00pm

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 4:37pm:

No no, dear boy, we distinctly remember.

Tariffs! You shrieked. Dessssspicable! Boo! Hiss!

So I'm curious. Whatever made you change your mind?

You don't remember, and never mind 'distinctly', what pantaloon you sniffed yesterday, son of glorious Pakistan.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101038

Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Reply #58 - Yesterday at 5:09pm

Frank wrote Yesterday at 5:00pm:

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 4:37pm:

No no, dear boy, we distinctly remember.

Tariffs! You shrieked. Dessssspicable! Boo! Hiss!

So I'm curious. Whatever made you change your mind?

You don't remember, and never mind 'distinctly', what pantaloon you sniffed yesterday, son of glorious Pakistan.

Oh, we most certainly do. You're so tendentious, you want to deflect and deny.

You do like to struggle, don't you now?

No worries, girlie, we'll give you something else. Do you deny being a devious non-wacist?

No one has the right to not be not offended, innit.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56868
Gender: male

Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Reply #59 - Yesterday at 5:55pm

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 5:09pm:

Frank wrote Yesterday at 5:00pm:

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 4:37pm:

No no, dear boy, we distinctly remember.

Tariffs! You shrieked. Dessssspicable! Boo! Hiss!

So I'm curious. Whatever made you change your mind?

You don't remember, and never mind 'distinctly', what pantaloon you sniffed yesterday, son of glorious Pakistan.

Oh, we most certainly do. You're so tendentious, you want to deflect and deny.

You do like to struggle, don't you now?

No worries, girlie, we'll give you something else. Do you deny being a devious non-wacist?

No one has the right to not be not offended, innit.

1. Early onset dementia with memory loss

2. Grimacing about having your full faculties (you are here, paki)

3. Vicious, uncontrolled anal rape fantasy ( your next post)

4. "Ten ruppee gimme" tap dancing

5. Oh! Look over there! Trump!

Er... That's it from Pakistan, insh'allah.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged