Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Vance: agent has “absolute immunity” (Read 299 times)
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28188
Gender: male
Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Jan 9th, 2026 at 9:53am
 
This is extremely troubling to hear from Vance. He thinks - and it’s worth pointing out he is dead wrong - that the agent who shot that woman has “absolute immunity”. That’s utter rubbish because if it were true, it would mean ICE agents could kill anyone for any reason and claim “absolute immunity” and never face consequences.

https://www.9news.com.au/world/minneapolis-ice-shooting-fbi-won-co-operate-with-...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55943
Gender: male
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #1 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 10:03am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 9:53am:
This is extremely troubling to hear from Vance. He thinks - and it’s worth pointing out he is dead wrong - that the agent who shot that woman has “absolute immunity”. That’s utter rubbish because if it were true, it would mean ICE agents could kill anyone for any reason and claim “absolute immunity” and never face consequences.

https://www.9news.com.au/world/minneapolis-ice-shooting-fbi-won-co-operate-with-...

From the context of that article i think the immunity is from STATE prosecution as ghe officer was carrying out federal law enforcement.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28188
Gender: male
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #2 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 10:04am
 
Just to be clear, the statement by Vance that the agent has “absolute immunity” is patently ridiculous and completely untrue. No law enforcement official anywhere in the United States has “absolute immunity”. None. All law enforcement officials are required to adhere to the law and the Constitution, from small town cops to FBI agents. Absolute immunity isn’t even a real thing!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28188
Gender: male
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #3 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 10:05am
 
Frank wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 10:03am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 9:53am:
This is extremely troubling to hear from Vance. He thinks - and it’s worth pointing out he is dead wrong - that the agent who shot that woman has “absolute immunity”. That’s utter rubbish because if it were true, it would mean ICE agents could kill anyone for any reason and claim “absolute immunity” and never face consequences.

https://www.9news.com.au/world/minneapolis-ice-shooting-fbi-won-co-operate-with-...

From the context of that article i think the immunity is from STATE prosecution as ghe officer was carrying out federal law enforcement.



He never said immunity from state prosecution. He specifically said “absolute immunity”, which infers that the agent is immune from federal law as well as state and local law. That simply is not true at all.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 14198
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #4 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 10:09am
 
From that site: 'Mobile phone footage appears to show the agent was already out of the path of the Honda when the shots were fired'.

Vance says he has Federal immunity. Trump sends them in and they can kill on the spot.

So the cop was injured previously. Does that mean the law changes to suit him and his revenge?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28188
Gender: male
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #5 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 10:17am
 
chimera wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 10:09am:
From that site: 'Mobile phone footage appears to show the agent was already out of the path of the Honda when the shots were fired'.

Vance says he has Federal immunity. Trump sends them in and they can kill on the spot.

So the cop was injured previously. Does that mean the law changes to suit him and his revenge?


No, I saw what Vance said and he said “absolute immunity”. Such a term means they would have effectively be above the law. It just simply is not true. Having said that, even if Kash Patel and his FBI did choose to indict the ICE agent (which we all know will never happen), I’d bet my last dollar that Trump would pre-emptively pardon him anyway.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 14198
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #6 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 10:45am
 
I was agreeing with you. Vance says he has immunity which means both from State and Fed. as 'absolute'.  Trump has given the court decision which shows how far he will go to destroy what makes US a civilised country.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 149430
Gender: male
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #7 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 10:57am
 

“The idea that a federal agent has absolute immunity for crimes they commit on the job is absolutely ridiculous,” said Michael J.Z. Mannheimer, a constitutional law expert at Northern Kentucky University’s Salmon P. Chase College of Law.

Mannheimer said that more than 120 years of case law on the issue of so-called supremacy clause immunity has shown that federal officials can be criminally pursued by state prosecutors for conduct taken in the course of their official duties but that it’s up to courts to ultimately determine whether they can be shielded from the charges.

“Officers are not entitled to absolute immunity as a matter of law,” said Timothy Sini, a former federal prosecutor in New York.


---------------------------------------

"It’s also possible that Good’s family could file a civil lawsuit against the agent who shot her, bringing a wrongful death claim that seeks monetary damages."

I hope they get the murdering bastard, one way or another.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 100476
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #8 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 11:38am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 10:05am:
Frank wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 10:03am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 9:53am:
This is extremely troubling to hear from Vance. He thinks - and it’s worth pointing out he is dead wrong - that the agent who shot that woman has “absolute immunity”. That’s utter rubbish because if it were true, it would mean ICE agents could kill anyone for any reason and claim “absolute immunity” and never face consequences.

https://www.9news.com.au/world/minneapolis-ice-shooting-fbi-won-co-operate-with-...

From the context of that article i think the immunity is from STATE prosecution as ghe officer was carrying out federal law enforcement.



He never said immunity from state prosecution. He specifically said “absolute immunity”, which infers that the agent is immune from federal law as well as state and local law. That simply is not true at all.


But of course. So cute to see the old boy playing word games with his much loved rule of law.

This is where the state and the feds fight over who gets the body. If the feds get him, DL will order Pam to dismiss all charges.

DL would have no qualms about this whatsoever. He's just pardoned and released a 400 ton drug trafficker who'd confessed in text messages to "shovelling drugs up the noses of the gringos".

DL's response to this shooting says it all. Before any facts became available, he immediately came out to lie, giving his followers the excuse they need.

His Vice Prez followed up to announce ICE agents have full immunity from prosecution.

And down here in Oz, we have cult worshippers pedalling as fast as they can, denying, defending and excusing a cold-blooded murder.

Oh brave new world with such wondrous things in it, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 149430
Gender: male
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #9 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 11:43am
 
Karnal wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 11:38am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 10:05am:
Frank wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 10:03am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 9:53am:
This is extremely troubling to hear from Vance. He thinks - and it’s worth pointing out he is dead wrong - that the agent who shot that woman has “absolute immunity”. That’s utter rubbish because if it were true, it would mean ICE agents could kill anyone for any reason and claim “absolute immunity” and never face consequences.

https://www.9news.com.au/world/minneapolis-ice-shooting-fbi-won-co-operate-with-...

From the context of that article i think the immunity is from STATE prosecution as ghe officer was carrying out federal law enforcement.



He never said immunity from state prosecution. He specifically said “absolute immunity”, which infers that the agent is immune from federal law as well as state and local law. That simply is not true at all.


But of course. So cute to see the old boy playing word games with his much loved rule of law.

This is where the state and the feds fight over who gets the body. If the feds get him, DL will order Pam to dismiss all charges.

DL would have no qualms about this whatsoever. He's just pardoned and released a 400 ton drug trafficker who'd confessed in text messages to "shovelling drugs up the noses of the gringos".

DL's response to this shooting says it all. Before any facts became available, he immediately came out to lie, giving his followers the excuse they need.

His Vice Prez followed up to announce ICE agents have full immunity from prosecution.

And down here in Oz, we have cult worshippers pedalling as fast as they can, denying, defending and excusing a cold-blooded murder.

Oh brave new world with such wondrous things in it, no?


Exactly what it was.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55943
Gender: male
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #10 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 1:48pm
 
What Vance said:




No State authority will investigate federal law enforcement. The officer therefore has absolute immunity from State prosecution.
Is there a Federal agency that wants to prosecute him? No, they isn't.
ICE will review the case - not prosecuted it - and that will be it.
Will the woman's family initiate a legal case? Quite possibly, supported by political oponents of ICE. Will such a case have legs?
We'll see.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 149430
Gender: male
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #11 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 1:55pm
 

“The idea that a federal agent has absolute immunity for crimes they commit on the job is absolutely ridiculous,” said Michael J.Z. Mannheimer, a constitutional law expert at Northern Kentucky University’s Salmon P. Chase College of Law.

Mannheimer said that more than 120 years of case law on the issue of so-called supremacy clause immunity has shown that federal officials can be criminally pursued by state prosecutors for conduct taken in the course of their official duties but that it’s up to courts to ultimately determine whether they can be shielded from the charges.
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55943
Gender: male
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #12 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 6:08pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 1:55pm:
“The idea that a federal agent has absolute immunity for crimes they commit on the job is absolutely ridiculous,” said Michael J.Z. Mannheimer, a constitutional law expert at Northern Kentucky University’s Salmon P. Chase College of Law.

Mannheimer said that more than 120 years of case law on the issue of so-called supremacy clause immunity has shown that federal officials can be criminally pursued by state prosecutors for conduct taken in the course of their official duties but that it’s up to courts to ultimately determine whether they can be shielded from the charges.

Absolute immunity from state prosecution as they were not acting under state authority.


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Leroy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4488
Gender: male
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #13 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 6:11pm
 
Good to see Vance backing law and order while the stupid lefties are baying for mob violence.
Back to top
 

Trump derangement syndrome
Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment"

Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 100476
Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
Reply #14 - Jan 9th, 2026 at 7:00pm
 
Frank wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 6:08pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2026 at 1:55pm:
“The idea that a federal agent has absolute immunity for crimes they commit on the job is absolutely ridiculous,” said Michael J.Z. Mannheimer, a constitutional law expert at Northern Kentucky University’s Salmon P. Chase College of Law.

Mannheimer said that more than 120 years of case law on the issue of so-called supremacy clause immunity has shown that federal officials can be criminally pursued by state prosecutors for conduct taken in the course of their official duties but that it’s up to courts to ultimately determine whether they can be shielded from the charges.

Absolute immunity from state prosecution as they were not acting under state authority.




I see. So if JD were to mean absolute immunity from all federal charges, you'd have a problem with that, would you?

You'd see something wrong with an administration letting a murderer off the hook, would you?

You'd take issue with a Vice Prez saying a federal employee should evade all justice for killing somebody, would you?

Two specific questions.

Over to you.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print