Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
NSW proposed new gun laws (Read 1655 times)
Sir Eoin O Fada
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3600
New England, NSW
Gender: male
Re: NSW proposed new gun laws
Reply #15 - Mar 7th, 2026 at 10:46am
 
Here’s a really stupid one.
In NSW  a Brown Bess musket, as issued to the troops of the First Fleet, falls under Category B licence, yet it is a muzzle loading weapon that in average hands can fire but one shot in two minutes.
A double barrel 12 gauge shotgun, with self cocking and automatic ejection, capable of at least eight shots in two minutes, in the same average hands, falls into Category A the least restrictive category.

Why would a low power, slow firing ,single shot gun be in a more restrictive category than a thoroughly modern, two shots at each loading,
more powerful gun?
Back to top
 

Self defence is a right.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 55735
Gender: male
Re: NSW proposed new gun laws
Reply #16 - Mar 7th, 2026 at 7:19pm
 
It has a rainbow 🌈 on it?
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 117743
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: NSW proposed new gun laws
Reply #17 - Mar 7th, 2026 at 8:36pm
 
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Mar 7th, 2026 at 10:46am:
Here’s a really stupid one.
In NSW  a Brown Bess musket, as issued to the troops of the First Fleet, falls under Category B licence, yet it is a muzzle loading weapon that in average hands can fire but one shot in two minutes.
A double barrel 12 gauge shotgun, with self cocking and automatic ejection, capable of at least eight shots in two minutes, in the same average hands, falls into Category A the least restrictive category.

Why would a low power, slow firing ,single shot gun be in a more restrictive category than a thoroughly modern, two shots at each loading,
more powerful gun?



a Brown Bess musket?

That's an antique for museums from 200 years ago?   Undecided



The "Brown Bess" is the nickname for the British Army's standard-issue,
.75 caliber, smoothbore flintlock musket used for over a century (c. 1722–1850s),
including in the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars. K
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Eoin O Fada
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3600
New England, NSW
Gender: male
Re: NSW proposed new gun laws
Reply #18 - Yesterday at 1:03pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Mar 7th, 2026 at 8:36pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Mar 7th, 2026 at 10:46am:
Here’s a really stupid one.
In NSW  a Brown Bess musket, as issued to the troops of the First Fleet, falls under Category B licence, yet it is a muzzle loading weapon that in average hands can fire but one shot in two minutes.
A double barrel 12 gauge shotgun, with self cocking and automatic ejection, capable of at least eight shots in two minutes, in the same average hands, falls into Category A the least restrictive category.

Why would a low power, slow firing ,single shot gun be in a more restrictive category than a thoroughly modern, two shots at each loading,
more powerful gun?



a Brown Bess musket?

That's an antique for museums from 200 years ago?   Undecided



The "Brown Bess" is the nickname for the British Army's standard-issue,
.75 caliber, smoothbore flintlock musket used for over a century (c. 1722–1850s),
including in the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars. K

Yes, and people still use them, I used one for years as a hunting gun until I found out that it was a First Fleet musket, then it was retired to a serious collector who swapped me a very valuable antique target rifle for it.

A friend has three original, unused Brown Besses, these sit in his safe alongside a reproduction Bess.
The three originals do not have to be registered but the reproduction does, because it is modern and not antique, they are virtually identical.
But for ‘’safety’’ reasons the reproduction must be registered.
Back to top
 

Self defence is a right.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print