Nice work   

Round up those crazy SovCits and lock 'em up!

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 10:17am:



Poor gweggy. Dissent is still allowed.

But Leroy makes a good point. How can they be SovCit's when they have firearm licences?

I guess it is because they are pseudo SovCit's, and they must be punished as well.

lee wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 1:00pm:


They aren't born SovCits.

Many, if not most of them, start off as normal people with drivers licenses and firearms licenses etc.

But then, one day, they get sucked in by a YouTube video and decide to become SovCits.

A lot of it is gradual too.

There is no rule book for SovCits - they aren't thrown out of the club if they're found to have a fishing license.

They're well known for picking and choosing which laws to obey or respect or feel they're entitled to be covered by.

The bottom line is, this is a good move by the WA police - they have my full support.

SovCits are dangerous, mentally ill people who should not be anywhere near a gun.

lee wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 1:31pm:


So say the partners, parents, children and friends of the many police officers who have been murdered by SovCits.

But you keep on laughing at them, if that's what gets you off, lee.

I have assisted disabled target shooters in mainline sporting events.
All of them could have their licences revoked under WA’s dictator laws.
Among those I’ve had the honour to assist was a chap who was almost completely paralysed except for his head.
He would look through the sights and indicate which way he wanted the rifle moved, when he was satisfied with the aim, one of us would put the trigger string in his mouth and he’d fire the shot.

I like to think that he enjoyed himself.

Perhaps the WA Police Commissioner would think he was a danger and should not have a liicence.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 2:46pm:



No one here has done that -

withdraw it with a sincere apology.

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Oct 5^th, 2025 at 10:14am:



Do a WWW >> image search << for...



GLOCK MODEL 22 .40 S&W

This particular semi-auto pistol is the firearm which [i believe] all Australian Police 'FORCES' [general duty officers] are issued with, Australia-wide.



ARGUMENT;
Some years ago, the Australian Government [federal parliament] decided to introduce, Australia wide FIREARM LAWS,
which make >> THE POSSESSION << of this type of firearm, in Australia, a criminal offence.









COUNTER ARGUMENT;
'Qualifying police officers,
get an exemption from such 'universal' firearm laws,
because of the nature and danger, of their work.'

QUESTION;
WHY SHOULD THEY ?

QUESTION;
WHY DO GOVERNMENTS.....VALUE THE LIFE OF A SERVANT OF THE POLITICAL STATE,
OVER, THE VALUE OF THE LIFE OF ANY LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN ?


Why.....should a person......
JUST BECAUSE HE/SHE >> IS A SERVANT << OF THE GOVERNMENT,
be entitled to MORE LIBERTY AND MORE FREEDOM, AND MORE RIGHTS,
than all of his/her fellow LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS ?
........SIMPLY BECAUSE....HE/SHE IS A SERVANT OF [not the people, but] THE POLITICAL STATE.


ARGUMENT;
I am an Australian citizen [i am an old man],
and i have never been charged or convicted of any criminal offence.
No illicit drug infringements - ever.
No drunk driving charges or convictions - ever.

Decades and decades, with a 'clean sheet'.

And yet, i would not be 'permitted' to purchase and own a firearm,
such as the GLOCK MODEL 22 .40 S&W.



IN COMPARISON.....
TO MY OWN LACK OF CRIMINAL INCLINATIONS.......
I have seen many reports in the mainstream media over the years......
detailing, >> the actions << of 'serving' police officers,
[persons who were daily, >> IN POSSESSION << of a 'prohibited firearm',
the GLOCK MODEL 22 .40 S&W]....



some, serving police officers have murdered their own spouse [with their service pistol, in W.A.],
some/many, serving police officers have been charged and convicted of child molestation,
some/many, serving police officers have been charged and convicted of aggravated RAPE,
some/many, serving police officers have been charged and convicted of TRAFFICKING IN LARGE AMOUNTS OF ILLICIT DRUGS!!,

One serving police officer [in W.A.] was charged and convicted of being under the influence of 'METH' [i.e. HE WAS A METH ADDICT !!!],
and while he was on duty, and while he was under the influence of 'METH',
he decided to discharge his GLOCK MODEL 22 .40 S&W service pistol,
in a W.A. suburban street, in order to 'destroy' a savage dog!!

FURTHER......
And we are all aware of the recent notorious double murder in NSW,
a double murder [ALLEGEDLY] carried out, by a member of the LBGTQRXYZ community,
who was also a 'serving' NSW police officer,
who was in POSSESSION of >> his GOVERNMENT ISSUED << ......GLOCK MODEL 22 .40 S&W.





ARGUMENT;
All police officers are members of our Australian community.

And yet, becoming a serving police officer,
DOES NOT imbue an individual, with an inability to commit a crime,
even a violent crime.

imbue = = fill with a feeling or quality.

And yet, ......our governments, feel that it is OK to issue police officers [fellow members of our community],
with PROHIBITED [in law] FIREARMS.