Sophia wrote on Sep 30
th, 2025 at 7:08am:
Has anyone had one installed, under sink or whole house?
I have under sink filters - takes chlorine & sediment out of town water.
I don't have reverse osmosis to take fluoride out of the water .... our town supply is not supposed to have fluoride in it - the Council put out a public vote & it came back NO to fluoride.
Reverse osmosis is far more expensive to buy & operate.
Depending on the quality of the filter membranes(%of fluoride it will remove) they range from $400 to $1,200 for a residential system.
And yes they would take up much of your under sink space......
but it doesn't have to go there - it can be set up outside - where you need to cut it in to the water inlet pipe from the mains and be in a little filter house - then it would do the whole house.
If it's about removing fluoride you want it gone from all taps .... you don't want to be cooking or showering in fluoridated water.
Of course people with/on tank water do not need reverse osmosis filtration - just normal filters if you wish.
Edit - reverse osmosis also wastes much more water - not good if you're on tanks.
Quote:A typical residential Reverse Osmosis (RO) system wastes 3 to 4 liters of water for every 1 liter of purified water it produces, though this ratio can vary depending on water quality, pressure, temperature, and the specific RO system. High-end industrial systems can achieve much lower waste ratios, potentially reaching 1:1. Factors like higher water pressure, higher water hardness, and more advanced system designs can lower the waste ratio.