Gnads wrote on Sep 16^th, 2025 at 6:41pm:


My son isn’t transgender, and I’ve never once claimed otherwise. That accusation is a barefaced fabrication plucked straight out of thin air.

Even if he were, it wouldn’t be some kind of negative mark. But given Baron’s well-documented disdain for trans people, the intent here was obviously to wield it as a “gotcha” insult, which tells you far more about his own prejudices than it does about me or my family.

Gnads wrote on Sep 16^th, 2025 at 8:04pm:


Ok, but you asked where Baron attacked them and you were provided a link.

Why the goalpost change?

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 16^th, 2025 at 9:50pm:


We know you're a bigot, you don't need to be so obvious about it, we get it.

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 16^th, 2025 at 9:59pm:


No, the real issue isn’t disagreement, it’s your reliance on slurs. You cycle through them like clockwork, Indigenous people, women, immigrants, gay and lesbian communities, and now trans people. The common denominator is obvious, if someone isn’t a straight white male, they’re in your firing line.

That tells me everything about your inability to argue on substance. When the scaffolding of your worldview is fear and resentment, you can’t help but fall back on abuse rather than reason. And when that fails, you reach for the well-worn costume of the “victim,” as though being challenged is some kind of persecution.

But let’s be blunt, it’s becoming harder for you to conceal what this really is, an outdated worldview rotting from the inside. You can only dress it up for so long before it sounds like what it is, the incoherent ranting of a bitter man pining for a past that’s gone and not coming back. And when all else fails, you lash out personally, as if insults could substitute for logic.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 17^th, 2025 at 6:25am:


Weak men create hard times.

Thanks Boomers.

But Bobby, the only "evidence" that the roommate was trans or transitioning is a TikTok where an anime filter misgendered him. That's it. That still image doing the rounds of the roommate was literally taken from this video.

He even said so himself in the caption, pointing out that the filter had no clue what it was looking at.

And yet, somehow, that's all Brooke Singman needed to churn out a Fox News article claiming not only that he was trans, but that he and the shooter were romantically involved.

If you actually read the piece, she even quotes a family member of Lance, the supposed "trans roommate", who flatly admitted she didn't know his politics or whether he was transitioning at all.

But the headline still screamed that the shooter "lived with his transgender partner".

That one flimsy article was enough for Patel to grab it, repost on X, and suddenly start declaring Lance was transgender as if it were a settled fact.

And you seriously don't see a problem with how paper-thin and manipulative that is?

You can see the tiktok account, the video and the caption all for yourself:

https://www.tiktok.com/@c00kies_n_cream

And here is the exact video in question:

https://www.tiktok.com/@c00kies_n_cream/video/7180861045320240426



His caption:

Quote:




You can see for yourself the photo of Lance that's been plastered everywhere was lifted directly from that TikTok.

And that alone is enough for you to lean right into your bigotry and run with it?

It's staggering how simple you all are. I know you fall over yourselves to swallow anything that feeds your hate model, no matter how flimsy, yet suddenly scepticism is your default setting the second you're faced with genuine, verifiable evidence that doesn't suit your narrative.

Why can't you apply even a fraction of that supposed "critical thinking" consistently?

Not a single red flag or alarm bell goes off with all of this?

Bobby. wrote on Sep 17^th, 2025 at 7:02am:


You're avoiding the question.

There isn't even the faintest flicker of doubt raised here, no red flag whatsoever, as you all leap to attribute the shooter to having lived with and been romantically involved with a transgender person, all on the back of the flimsiest "evidence" imaginable?

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 16^th, 2025 at 8:16pm:

Link?