greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28^th, 2025 at 10:00pm:


Sovereign citizen.

There was a video of the Victorian bloke hassling his neighbours - and for a 'sovereign citizen' he was quick to say he would go after them in the courts for harassing him ...

Apparently the idea is that a Sovereign citizen can pick and choose which laws he/she will accept ... now I can understand that given some of the 'laws' our politicians make up in their wet dreams... look at 'land right's laws and stuff and the way that has been progressively perverted into something it never was at the beginning... look at 'violence' laws that are themselves imposition of violence to cure violence - a total oxymoron...

When legislators and the laws they create are wrongful - it is a duty to oppose and reject those laws.

The problem then seems to be that some are saying - 'all or nothing'.... so instead of opposing specific 'laws' that are wrongful, they just reject the lot.  It's the modern way of trying to see everything as black or white.

Then the hypocrisy begins when they feel entitled to use laws when they feel like it, but not when they don't.

Politicians, of course - are the absolute Sovereign Citizens - they feel they are above the law in their making of laws..... and in many ways in this country they are .... understand the difference?

I think this 'sovereign citizen' cult is one way of people expressing their discontent with what our Poor Fellow - My Country has become.  The Cheers of course try to use it to say they don't accept Whartey's law since they never gave up the sovereignty they never had (like that concept of gold at the Agnew Mine) .. maybe that guy felt pissed off that he couldn't make a land claim and get grift for nothing or something... maybe he thought he was taking a stand against the Jacinta Alien style of government by killing cops... resisting tyranny as he saw it...

Perhaps we - as a Nation - need to restore the democratic process to the hands of the people and restore equal rights for all instead of this insane identity politics.  Every time you see some sheila 'CEO' for example - do you REALLY think she is better or best for the job?  Or is she there because the companies feel intimidated and will be called misogynists and similar if they put a bloke there?

What kind of government is that?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 9:57am:



Lol   

Katter sounds a bit old fashioned, like an Aussie.
My kind of bloke, our society needs more bunches of fives and less bunches of’’feel goody’’ violets.

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 12:13pm:


You think violence is a sane reaction to a question?

You think more violence in society is a good thing?

Katter has confessed to several violent crimes under Section 245 of QLD's Criminal Code 1899.

"I have on many occasions, punched blokes in the mouth."

He needs to be removed from parliament as it is not a safe workplace while he is there.

This is totally unacceptable.

There is no excuse whatsoever for his behaviour.

Daves2017 wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 1:08pm:


In any other workplace he would be summarily dismissed for serious misconduct.

The threat he made to the journalist was bad enough, but he has also confessed to several violent crimes.

He needs to be removed immediately.

A SovCit moon landing denier defending violence.

Who would have thought?

aquascoot wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 1:54pm:


Ain't that the truth.

There is no greater brawn over brains region in Aus, but it's a necessity to survive up there.

You could always go up there and scald them