So a 1/4 of the world will be on A.I. life support.
Pray no-one trips over the plug cord.

And from the same website :




AI agents will likely replace politicians, not chatbots.

China is plugging it in to US, Oz and other backward barbarian tribes. It will pump foreign trade profits to CCP, with GST and interest.  Otherwise, the western world shuts down.

AI chatbots can hide secret messages invisible to surveillance

New AI-generated secret messaging undetectable by cybersecurity, provides secure communication amid rising global surveillance


Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), especially large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and open-source counterparts, are reshaping how people communicate daily. These AI systems generate human-like text, answer questions clearly, and even help automate customer service tasks. But now, scientists have found a surprising new use for AI chatbots: securely sending secret messages that can’t be detected by cybersecurity systems.

A recent study, posted on the scientific database arXiv, introduced a novel method that turns AI-generated text into hidden carriers for encrypted messages. This innovative approach offers a crucial alternative for secure communication, especially as governments worldwide seek ways to detect, monitor, or restrict traditional encrypted messages.

thebrighterside.news/post/ai-chatbots-can-hide-secret-messages-invisible-to-surv
eillance/

Pseudoscience regarding climate change involves the dismissal or denial of the scientific consensus on climate change, often through the use of misleading arguments or false information that masquerades as science. This type of pseudoscience can take many forms, including arguing against the validity of the scientific evidence, misrepresenting the data, or promoting alternative theories that contradict the established scientific understanding.

(Google search ai)


Cybrothel: Reinventing intimacy at Germany’s only sex doll brothel

Discover Cybrothel, Berlin’s sex doll brothel which blends cutting-edge AI, VR, and robotics to create a new kind of adult experience.

the-berliner.com/berlin/cybrothel-sex-doll-brothel-friedrichshain-ai-vr-robot/



Even sex workers are going to lose their jobs to Ai/Robotics.

(deepseek)

opinion on : https://scienceisneversettled.com/?page_id=25


The website "Science Is Never Settled" (specifically the page https://scienceisneversettled.com/?page_id=25) appears to be a skeptical take on climate science, likely arguing against the scientific consensus on human-caused global warming.

Initial Observations & Red Flags
Domain Name:

The phrase "Science Is Never Settled" is a common rhetorical trope used by climate skeptics to suggest that mainstream climate science is unreliable or politically motivated.

This framing ignores that while science is always refining, core conclusions (e.g., CO₂ drives warming, humans are the dominant cause since 1950) are settled with extremely high confidence.

Lack of Transparency:

The site does not clearly state who runs it, their qualifications, or funding sources (potential bias).

No peer-reviewed citations are visible at a glance—instead, it likely critiques IPCC reports or mainstream climate science.

Likely Arguments:

Based on similar skeptic sites, it may push:

"Climate has always changed" (ignoring the speed & cause of current changes).

"Models are unreliable" (despite their proven skill at predicting warming).

"Scientists exaggerate for funding" (a conspiracy claim debunked by multiple studies).

How to Assess Its Credibility
Compare to Scientific Consensus:

The IPCC, NASA, NOAA, and >99% of climate scientists agree that:

Warming since 1950 is primarily human-caused (CO₂, methane, etc.).

Impacts (sea level rise, extreme weather) are accelerating.

If this site disputes those, it’s likely cherry-picking or misrepresenting data.

Check Sources:

Does it cite peer-reviewed studies or just blogs/opinion pieces?

Are its critiques addressed in mainstream science? (E.g., "hiatus" claims were resolved by Cowtan & Way 2013, Karl et al. 2015.)

Follow the Money:

Many skeptic sites have ties to fossil fuel interests (e.g., Heartland Institute).

Anonymous sites are particularly suspect.

Conclusion: Low Credibility
Without seeing the exact content (the link redirects to a homepage), this site fits a known pattern of climate misinformation. Key warning signs:

No clear authorship/credentials.

Likely reliance on debunked talking points.

"Science is never settled" framing (used to dismiss overwhelming evidence).

For trustworthy climate science, stick to:

IPCC reports (www.ipcc.ch)

NASA Climate (climate.nasa.gov)

Peer-reviewed journals (Nature Climate Change, PNAS, etc.).

Would you like me to analyze specific claims from the site if you share them?

BTW - Here are the projections from IPCC AR6 the physical science basis Chapter 12.




Edit: For those that are technically challenged it is in Chapter 12.5.2