I want to see a public trial so that the truth can come out.
It looks like Fauci sent money and forbidden gene splicing technology
to Wuhan which they used to make a bio weapon - Covid-19.

Is Biden trying to cover it all up?

Maybe the ICC at the Hague can do it?

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9^th, 2024 at 9:07am:



Why is Biden trying to protect Fauci if he did nothing wrong?   

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9^th, 2024 at 10:09am:



Shut up Monk.

one such as I am
exposes the darkness without permission
or approval yes this work is not for the faint
hearted beloved ones ... and this is why and
from the energy in which I emanate in whom I am
as a humble servant in the divine
and sacred LIGHT as we continue
to monitor all thoughts word
and deed, and so it is

namaste

Bobby. wrote on Dec 9^th, 2024 at 10:16am:


Crap.

Just post about your idiotic opinions about covid in Fringe.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 9^th, 2024 at 8:59pm:



Fauci caused it -
didn't you see my 97 page thread on it?

here:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1580611988/1450#1450

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9^th, 2024 at 9:49pm:




97 pages with most pages leading to many links and many videos.
There is more content in my thread than in most books.
You could say that I have at least written the equivalent of a book -
only it's not mostly my personal opinion but is linked to
the opinions of dozens of experts.
What a wealth of information to share.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Science has declined to answer any questions to avoid incriminating itself for crimes it may have committed.

Upon being brought in for a Congressional hearing over its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, Science stated that it was advised by its attorneys to not answer questions so as to not to provide damaging witness against itself.

"Science has elected to exercise its fifth amendment right to not provide testimony that may be used against it in criminal proceedings," said Science's attorney Jay Varner. "This decision should in no way be taken as an admission of guilt by Science. We continue to maintain that Science is wholly innocent, and hope it will keep its mouth shut from here on out."

Representative after representative grew visibly frustrated as Science repeatedly invoked its constitutional protections.

"So when exactly did you know natural immunity was superior to vaccination?" one congressman asked.

"On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer," said Science.

"Why did you call for censorship of anyone who stated that COVID leaked from a lab, when you knew that was the most likely explanation?"

"I invoke the Fifth."

"Was the rule for six feet of social distancing based on actual evidence?"

"Fifth."

"Did you ever tell people they couldn't go to church but could attend a BLM protest?"

"I'm going to go with... the fifth."

Legal experts noted that invoking the Fifth Amendment is a constitutional right and does not, by itself, imply wrongdoing. They also observed that it was nevertheless an unusual strategy for Science, which had proclaimed itself to be "settled" back in 2020.

At publishing time, Science had requested that law enforcement please stop "following the Science."