Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 27^th, 2024 at 12:06pm:


You're the only one going "round and round".

You were pointed to an exact post and you keep going, round and round, trying to avoid addressing it, then you go on the attack, or play the victim or even claim some grand conspiracy against you.

You keep doing victory laps like you've won something, yet you keep using all these tactics of a loser who is too scared to show up for a second debate.

So of course you're not interested, you've got nothing to gain.

Heaven forbid you'd show some integrity every once in a while.

I haven't bothered with your usual tedious #9.  Simple.  You just go round and round in circles talking nonsense and never accepting anything outside your limited views.

You're not even remotely making any point below - you just are stuck in your own silly ideas.  You'll work it out some day.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 27^th, 2024 at 12:22pm:


Not at all - merely responding to someone who goes round and round.  You'll work it out given enough time.

In all the posts from you and dividie - with my few responses - I'm the only one who addressed the issue here - you two just want to play games.  It's your nature - I understand that.  You both have something to prove to the world, which is why most here don't bother with you.

I'm kind.

Let's try this for you both:-  dividie now reckons that staff at doors of shops never had any duty to check thieves on exit.... the only reason they are now instructed not to is because of violence - intimidation... thinks he made some big score down below by suggesting staff never did that.... what a laugh.  Cameras have got 'em nowadays anyway.

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 27^th, 2024 at 12:26pm:


Do you even read what you post..?

What you ought to consider is starting a blog.

This is a discussion forum, yet you seem uninterested in engaging with views that differ from your own unless they align with your preconceptions.

When confronted with dissenting opinions, you retreat behind a veil of insults, conspiracy, or outright dismissal. Rather than addressing what is being said, you reframe it into something more palatable.

Over the years, I have never witnessed you acknowledge the many glaring mistakes you’ve made. Instead, you consistently shift the goalposts, attack those who point out inconsistencies, and have never once conceded, "Yes, that was my error."

You do not seek discussion or debate; you do not desire a genuine exchange of ideas. Instead, you wish to present your opinions as incontrovertible facts, insulated from the need for justification and exempt from criticism.

You attempt to present your views in isolation, where they are not subjected to scrutiny. In doing so, you craft narratives that often contradict each other, yet you seem unwilling to accept this as problematic.

Starting a blog might better suit your needs.

The core issue appears to be that your ego and your views are too fragile to withstand even basic scrutiny, and that's understandable. We all have limitations.

No one is infallible.

Accept those limitations and operate within them. Wordpress still offers free blogs; you could start there.

The problem with types like Skanka, Methra and so forth is that they perpetually seek to dictate the terms of discussion, and always along the lines of their infantile emotion-based approach - the one where facts are over-borne by shouted rhetoric and shut-down of discussion via abuse and insult.

Thus they seek to employ terms like 'hate', 'racist', to attack the holder of any view they disagree with, instead of discussing the issue on its merits.

Children in reality, lost in an adult world.

Now then - what kinds are extant in this society who are prepared to offer violence rather than be corrected in poor behaviour and actions?  Which groups does this kind of social malfunction predominate in?

It's clear in Ross Mayo's comment that all politicians that wouldn't listen (meaning hear and obey) would be punished..... amazing in a so-called democracy that people can threaten politicians for not accepting their dictates.

Just an example to continue to extend this basic discussion of some piss-poor examples of humanity threatening someone for requesting civil behaviour.  As I said to an old digger mate years ago, when he was into guilt... you don't have to hate them... just doing your job.

John Smith wrote on Sep 27^th, 2024 at 5:45pm:


Shut up dickhead.

On top of all that - abuse for speaking up is precisely what these dorks do here.  They are the problem - never any solution, and pretend to be heroically fighting for 'Aboriginal rights' - when what they are doing is abrogating the rights of everyone else to suit this mad phase of Aboriginal Supremacism over Australia.

Somebody tell them they lost, and their 'spiritual connection' is no more than anyone else's.

Also they float in, throw sht around, and then vanish.  Clearly just here for the herh-herh 'fun'.